Even this cherry - picked
duration showed a warming trend.
Not exact matches
Research has
shown that adequately
warming up and working on your mobility as a part of the
warm - up process can influence your overall nervous system and muscular strength, thus leading to higher force exertion for the
duration of your workout.
But the evidence
shows this can't be true; temperature changes before CO2 in every record of any
duration for any time period; CO2 variability does not correlate with temperature at any point in the last 600 million years; atmospheric CO2 levels are currently at the lowest level in that period; in the 20th century most
warming occurred before 1940 when human production of CO2 was very small; human production of CO2 increased the most after 1940 but global temperatures declined to 1985; from 2000 global temperatures declined while CO2 levels increased; and any reduction in CO2 threatens plant life, oxygen production, and therefore all life on the planet.
The present
warming phase is now around 15000 years old in its obvious effects, perhaps 20000 in overall
duration, and is leading back, as might a «tidal effect», running back from the equator returning to the Polar Regions, which are NOW
showing the effects in an observable manner.
Among all the main land based records (NOAA, GISSTEMP, HADCRUT4, C&W) and the two satellite records, over the
duration of the pause, UAH
shows the largest
warming trend and RSS the lowest.
This spectral viewpoint also
shows that Paul Vaughan's LOD analysis is unlikely to have anything more to say about global
warming than do the other phenomena of that
duration, all which have been with us for centuries as far as we know.
The histograms all
show similar average
warming trends and the stations with the longest measurement
durations show the least dispersion of temperature trends.
But then I discovered that HadCRUT3 was
showing warming for the
duration of this no - warrming period.
There are some 900 + peer - reviewed studies, which have come from some 40 + countries
showing that the MWP was as
warm as this
warming, plus as long a
duration.
But they also have a map
showing warming and cooling stations of over 70 years
duration, and again the ratio is said to be 2:1.
A sceptic would put ALL the trend lines in of similar
duration, not just selecting a few, like the IPCC and Skeptical Science do when
showing just one period of short term high rate of
warming, a sceptic would
show all.»
I can
show either
warming or cooling using moving averages or linear trends just by changing the
duration of the data.