Sentences with phrase «during justice questions»

During justice questions in the House of Commons, Truss said: «We have already announced a review of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 — we will shortly be announcing the timetable — but we need a system that is both open and affordable, which is exactly what the government are delivering.»

The extent of the retreat from Michael Howard's «prison works» policy was evident during Justice questions on Tuesday.

During Justice Questions yesterday, the issue of votes for prisoners was raised on the back of the recent judgment from the European Court of Human Rights.

Well, Julian Huppert asked some searching questions about the reforms during justice questions towards the tail end of last year, triggering Grayling's announcement that he would offer fresh concessions.

Speaking during Justice Questions, the Cabinet minister said the Government was reviewing measures such as extra netting, before adding:

Not exact matches

The Democratic senator questioned his accountability and the stock gains he profited from during the time millions of unauthorized accounts were opened at the bank, ultimately recommending he resign, return the money he earned during that time and be criminally investigated by the SEC and the Department of Justice.

Comey's testimony raises questions about whether Trump obstructed justice in his interactions with the former FBI director, beginning with a dinner on January 27, during which Comey said Trump asked him for his «loyalty.»

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions takes questions during a press conference at the Department of Justice on March 2, 2017 in Washington, DC.

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».

Republican presidential front - runner Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpGOP lawmakers want Trump to stop bashing Congress US ends aid for northwest Syria: report FBI informant met with three Trump campaign advisers: report MORE during a radio interview appeared to question the circumstances surrounding Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's death.

Asked by Mr Iddrisu if she would abide the seniority principle at the bench during her tenure as Chief Justice, Justice Akuffo said: «I really don't understand the import of that question but yes, seniority at the bench is an established practice and one gives respect to everybody.

During oral arguments, several justices questioned whether the federal anti-corruption law — also used in the Skelos case — was too vague and being interpreted too broadly.

Liz Cheney's group Keep America Safe, which has led the resurgent Republican attacks on President Obama's national security policies, is releasing a video this morning that questions the loyalties of Justice Department lawyers who advocated for detained terror suspects during the Bush Administration.

On - topic questions included the timing of the effectiveness of the laws signed today and when ICE will close it's office on Rikers Island, how many people currently on Rikers Island will be covered by these laws, details of Carlos Rodriguez (who was held on Rikers Island for eight months on an ICE detainer) path to this country and his thoughts during his eight month detention, what Mayor de Blasio would like to see the federal government do about immigration and what he will do absent such action, what he would tell Republicans who think his approach is a dangerous precedent, de Blasio and Melissa Mark - Viverito's positions on municipal IDs and voting rights for non-citizens, the number of people arrested on misdemeanors and then subject to ICE detainers and whether persons arrested on felony charges must first go through the justice system before being subject to an ICE detainer.

WASHINGTON (CNN)- A leading Senate Democrat predicts Eric Holder will be confirmed as the nation's next attorney general, despite tough questions expected from some Republicans about his Justice Department stint during the Clinton administration.

He said he was beginning another four years in office during «troubled times» when people were questioning whether the country's economic system and justice system are fair.

Questions during the off topic portion of the Q&A included Governor Cuomo's announcement today that New York State will not permit fracking, Mayor de Blasio's scheduled meeting with the NY Justice League, whether Mayor de Blasio thinks he is able to unite the City and how New Yorkers have received him, President Obama's announcement of moving to normalize relations with Cuba and Mayor de Blasio's own trip to Cuba.

Justice Secretary Ken Clarke changed his mind about doing a live interview for BBC Two's Daily Politics after he saw Ed Miliband call for his resignation during Prime Minister's Questions.

And if you heard the skeptical questions from the justices during oral arguments, today's conclusion comes as no surprise.

The question for the justices during much of the oral arguments today was whether they granted review of the right case to resolve that issue.

During the arguments, justices lamented the lengthiness of the case, which started in 2010, and questioned what kind of remedy they could offer to help failing students while still preserving the education being offered to the ones that succeed.

The question for the justices during much of the oral arguments last week was whether they granted review of the right case to resolve that issue.

The questions, although broad, do not necessarily address social justice issues like the social policies that influence graduation requirements, the aspirations of students with special needs, including those diagnosed with mental health and behaviour issues, the needs of ESL students arriving during their teenage years, etc..

The icebreaker question, raised by Field Foundation president Angelique Power during last week's Practicing Utopia over Breakfast program, gets at the aim of this year's art and social practice Open Engagement conference: critically examining and supporting social - justice - oriented artmaking and administration.

She has also delved deep into the likely questions a judge or justice will ask during oral argument, often pinpointing the vulnerabilities that need to be addressed to win the case.

The Justices had very few questions for the attorneys representing the Fund and instead aimed most of their questions at the plaintiff attorney during his oral argument.

In this way, his answers departed notably from those that Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. gave when asked similar questions during his confirmation hearings four months ago.»

The ruling came as a surprise to many Court watchers given Justice Roberts» hostility to the Voting Rights Act during questioning at oral argument.

For the second question, Justice Sullivan ruled that a party may rely on the Sahaluk I decision during the suspended declaration of invalidity as stare decisis but may not invoke its remedial effect until the suspension lapses (at para 38).

But Blonde Justice says that the whole reason the police would ask you the question in the first place is because there is some way to incriminate you with the photo, i.e., distinctive clothing in the photo that matches clothing worn by the perpetrator caught on tape during a robbery.

Chief Justice John Roberts has said of this trend, «It is too much...» Although, of course, no one has to worry about Justice Clarence Thomas, who has not asked a question during oral argument for eight years.

«It's a very extraordinary animal in legal culture to have two different proceedings addressing the same question that lead to different results,» Chief Justice John Roberts noted during Monday's oral arguments.

«It's a very extraordinary animal in legal culture to have two different proceedings addressing the same question that lead to different results,» Chief Justice John Roberts said Monday during oral arguments in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. Lee.

«Each of theses stories are just filled with teachings,» said Justice Murray Sinclair during the question and answer portion of the session.

As Mrs Justice Roberts remarked in Cooper - Hohn: «A party may well feel constrained in answering questions or providing transparent answers during the course of cross examination if he or she believes that what is said will be on the nation's breakfast tables the following morning... this goes far beyond issues of price sensitive information which might affect the share price of a publicly quoted company.

On this subsidiary issue the Chief Justice was also clear in stating that such an «invitation» should not be given as the appellate court should not go beyond raising questions during oral argument.

You're Invited to a Webinar Answering Questions on: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL»S HONORS PROGRAM AND SUMMER LAW INTERN PROGRAM AT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Hosted by: Rena J. Cervoni, Deputy Director and Trisha A. Fillbach, Assistant Director Office of Attorney Recruitment and Management During the webinars, participants will: • Obtain a brief overview of this year's programs; • Receive answers to questions about the application; and • Gain an understanding of the hiring Questions on: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL»S HONORS PROGRAM AND SUMMER LAW INTERN PROGRAM AT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Hosted by: Rena J. Cervoni, Deputy Director and Trisha A. Fillbach, Assistant Director Office of Attorney Recruitment and Management During the webinars, participants will: • Obtain a brief overview of this year's programs; • Receive answers to questions about the application; and • Gain an understanding of the hiring questions about the application; and • Gain an understanding of the hiring timeline.

To a similar question during her confirmation, Justice Sotomayor said, «It is inconceivable to me today that a decision permitting the detention, arrest of an individual solely on the basis of their race would be considered appropriate by our government.»

The following questions have been referred to the European Court of Justice: (i) «If a European Union citizen, present in a Member State of which she is not a national, was, prior to the transposition of Council Directive (EC) 2004/38, the holder of a residence permit validly issued pursuant to art 4 (2) of Council Directive (EEC) 68/360, but was for a period of time during the currency of the permit voluntarily unemployed, not self - sufficient and outside the qualifications for the issue of such a permit, did that person by reason only of her possession of the permit, remain during that time someone who «resided legally» in the host Member State for the purpose of later acquiring a permanent right of residence under art 16 (1) of Directive 2004/38»

Justice Ashcroft concluded that members of the Legislative Assembly exercise their power and influence during Question Period in the same manner as they do in other forms of legislative debate.

Thus, according to Justice Ashcroft, it was the Legislative Assembly that infringed on McIver's freedom of speech during Question Period (McIver, at para 27).

I have given these questions significant thought during the first months of my term as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner.