Sentences with phrase «during conflict discussions»

He long ago discovered that to maintain a satisfying relationship, couples must generate five seconds of positive emotions for every second of negative emotions during conflict discussions.

These guys simply don't get distressed during conflict discussions.

Indeed, even during conflict discussions, 50 % of couples had 7 or fewer hostile behaviors (range, 0 - 63).

If you're able to stay on track during conflict discussions, great!

There was less hostility expressed by both husbands and wives during conflict discussions if they had taken the Bringing Baby Home program.

There was less hostility expressed by both husbands and wives during conflict discussions if they had taken the BBH program.

When my team monitored couples for bodily changes during a conflict discussion, we could see just how physically distressing flooding was.

As we have discussed previously, Dr. Gottman discovered that «Masters» of relationships maintain a 5:1 ratio of positivity to negativity during conflict discussions.

Buffering attachment - related avoidance: Softening emotional and behavioral defenses during conflict discussions.

Interestingly, this stress response pattern was mirrored by less constructive ways of soliciting and providing support during the conflict discussion: anxiously attached wives were less able to recognize their avoidant husbands» distress, whereas avoidant husbands found it difficult to constructively express their needs to their anxious wives.

Playful bids and enthusiastic efforts to turn towards each other result in heightened levels of positivity during conflict discussions.

And we discovered that if a wife trusts her husband, both of their blood consistently flows slower — not only during their conflict discussion but at other times as well.

In our last posting on The Gottman Relationship Blog, we talked about finding common ground during a conflict discussion and shared an exercise to help you and your partner understand each other's basic emotional needs.

On Wednesday, we went into depth about their findings and discussed the effects of physiological flooding on an individual's ability to communicate during conflict discussions.

Plotted scores for the affective behavior of two example couples during the conflict discussion task.

In the following section, we present two empirical applications that extend the basic model: In the first one, we study observational data concerning the affective behavior of spouses during a conflict discussion, and in the second one, we analyze diary data concerning negative affect.

Greater Maternal Insensitivity in Childhood Predicts Greater Electrodermal Reactivity During Conflict Discussions With Romantic Partners in Adulthood.

During a conflict discussion, the Masters had a ratio of 5:1 positive interactions to negative interactions, while the Disasters had a ratio of 0.8:1.

If the ratio of positivity to negativity exceeds 5.0 during conflict discussions, a couple is likely to stay together.

During this conflict discussion, couples were alone in the room and were videotaped.