Sentences with phrase «during settlement negotiations in»

Successfully represented a client during settlement negotiations in a wrongful termination matter, in which the plaintiff's six figure demand was reduced to less than $ 5,000.

Successfully represented a client during settlement negotiations in a complex commercial dispute in which the plaintiff's multi-million-dollar demand was reduced to $ 5,000.

Not exact matches

«Instead, my investigation revealed that during the mediation and negotiation of a settlement, the chief concern of those in the Assembly was mitigating the Assembly's damages,» Donovan wrote.

In addition, some debt settlement companies advise their clients to stop paying their bills during settlement negotiations.

Yes in most cases debt settlement will temporarily hinder your credit scores during the months you are building your account for the debt negotiations.

In our experience, claimants are not advised at all how to invest lump sum damages during settlement negotiations.

The expertise gained during the exciting professional career of Nicola ranges through all brand and design protection activities worldwide; however, the main feature of his professional profile consists in the care and effectiveness by which his clients are assisted in all steps concerning the negotiation of agreements as well as in the drafting and completion of license agreements and / or settlement of disputes concerning Intellectual Property rights.

Your legal advice during the negotiation process certainly helped in reaching a fair settlement.

Additionally, an attorney can investigate whether you have a case, make sure that relevant evidence is gathered, file your complaint in court, and represent you in court and during settlement negotiations.

This provides you with a distinct advantage during settlement negotiations or in court.

Nevertheless, the following cases should be evaluated by a slip and fall victim when considering their damage demands and evaluating their case in settlement negotiations, both before and during litigation.

In equitable distribution states, the idea of a «fiduciary relationship» between spouses has been applied only in the context of disclosing assets during the negotiation of antenuptial or property settlement agreementIn equitable distribution states, the idea of a «fiduciary relationship» between spouses has been applied only in the context of disclosing assets during the negotiation of antenuptial or property settlement agreementin the context of disclosing assets during the negotiation of antenuptial or property settlement agreements.

Depending on the motivation behind a party's request that the settlement agreement contain a confidentiality clause in the first place, and the relative bargaining power of the parties during negotiations, the impact of a confidentiality provision can be either quite restrictive or have very little practical effect.

During settlement negotiations with insurers or opposing counsel, and especially in any legal filings with the court, your attorney will make reference to (or «cite») prior cases in which the courts in your state decided on issues like fault or damages, in ways that are favorable to your position.

During discovery and settlement negotiations, the unsecured creditors agreed to dismiss their lawsuit in return for a waiver of costs.

An experienced car accident attorney will help protect your rights in court and during the settlement negotiation process.

The criminal case may help advance settlement negotiations in the civil matter because the defendants recognize the likelihood that the civil case will provide additional public scrutiny of their actions (if their reputation is valuable to them) or will support a civil award because of strong evidence compiled by law enforcement during the criminal investigation.

In addition, there is a risk that communications with the authorities made during the course of settlement negotiations will be disclosable in subsequent civil proceedings, although they may be protected from inspection by a right analogous to the «without prejudice» rulIn addition, there is a risk that communications with the authorities made during the course of settlement negotiations will be disclosable in subsequent civil proceedings, although they may be protected from inspection by a right analogous to the «without prejudice» rulin subsequent civil proceedings, although they may be protected from inspection by a right analogous to the «without prejudice» rule.

The spinal cord injury lawyers at Abels & Annes, P.C. can be your advocates both during settlement negotiations, as well as in the courtroom.

During settlement negotiations with the authorities, companies should be aware of the risk that the fact of a settlement, as well as any associated press coverage or documents (such as a statement of facts in a DPA), may raise awareness of potential civil claims, and in certain circumstances may even be relied upon to support such claims.

Therefore, if you are pursuing a claim against a company like Allstate Insurance, and due to out extensive experience with dealing with Allstate Insurance in the past, we understand exactly what types of counter offers Allstate may be more likely to respond to during settlement negotiations.

Summary Dismissal Affirmed In Legal Malpractice Case Where Plaintiff Failed To Show That «Pertinent Decision Makers» Of Government Agency «Would Have» Agreed To A «Better Result» But For The Alleged Incorrect Legal Advice Given By Lawyer During Settlement Negotiations Manveen Saluja, M.D v Honigman Miller Schwartz And Cohn LLP, et al, Unpublished Per Curiam Opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals, issued March 16, 2017 (Docket No. 330367)

In a recent Supreme Court of Canada («SCC») decision, Sable Offshore Energy Inc. v. Ameron International Corp. 1, the SCC provided clarification pertaining to what may be considered a customary demand from defendants» counsel during the course of settlement negotiations involving co-defendants who have reached settlement by way of Pierringer Agreements («settling defendants»).

The court considered whether the interpretation exception offended the principle underlying the Rule, namely to encourage parties to speak freely and to promote settlement, and accepted TMT's submissions that: «if a party to negotiations knows that, in the event of a dispute about what a settlement contract means, objective facts which emerge during negotiations will be admitted in order to assist the court to interpret the agreement in accordance with the parties» true intentions, settlement is likely to be encouraged not discouraged».

However, the commercial reality is that there may be occasions when parties wish to discuss sensitive facts during settlement negotiations that they would not want discussed in open court.

In turn, BHPK attorneys have successfully advised employers during settlement negotiations, including non-monetary settlements.

The most common mistakes attorneys and clients make during a divorce include not considering the tax consequences of a settlement, allowing family and friends to interfere with decisions, allowing emotions to dictate decisions, forgetting you may need cash after the divorce, not securing divorce payments with insurance, trying to hide facts or assets, quitting a job to get more child support or alimony, failing to prepare for settlement negotiations or mediation, dating during a divorce, putting the children in the middle of the divorce, getting emotionally attached to an assets, and neglecting post-divorce financial planning.

Common divorce mistakes clients make include forgetting about taxes, allowing friends and family to influence them, letting your emotions control your decisions, not considering the liquidity of assets you receive in the divorce, not securing support payments with insurance, trying to hide assets, quitting work to get more support, not being prepared for settlement negotiations or mediation, dating during the divorce, using the children as bargaining chips, getting emotionally attached to assets, and neglecting post-divorce financial planning.

Alternatively, in a collaborative divorce, both parties» attorneys are present during the negotiation process, which takes place during settlement conferences.

Everything said during mediation, any draft resolutions or unsigned mediated agreements are considered settlement negotiations, and therefore will not be admissible in court.

Ms. JANSEN believes that the collaborative practice model offers parties the best of both the mediation and the advocacy worlds, in that the process is 100 % committed to a fair out of court settlement, and the clients have the support of legal and psychological counselors both as advisors and spokespersons during negotiation.

Lawyers advise and assist clients during settlement negotiations, and spouses meet with their own and the other party's Collaborative divorce attorney in St. Charles Illinois.

The collaborative process will generally be your preferred option if, like in mediation, you want full legal representation from an attorney during the settlement negotiations, but, unlike mediation, you want the negotiations to take place in a supportive, rather than an adversarial, environment.

The appellate court ruled that although the settlement negotiations between the two parties did not violate the automatic stay, it is not permissible for a creditor to engage in «coercive or harassing tactics» during the negotiation.