Having a friend undoubtedly makes a child happier and less lonely, but is there any good evidence that
dyadic relationships with peers have long - term effects on personality or socialized behavior?
More specifically, we explore the possibility that the effects of perceived student misbehavior on teacher wellbeing are mediated and / or moderated by mental representations of
the dyadic relationship with students.
Not exact matches
The study «Eye of the Beholder: The Individual and
Dyadic Contributions of Empathic Accuracy and Perceived Empathic Effort to
Relationship Satisfaction,» published in the «Journal of Family Psychology» in 2012, found that women were more satisfied
with their marriage if they felt their husbands were at least trying to understand how they felt.
Again, we found that people depicted in profiles
with dyadic pictures and statuses were judged to have better
relationships and were better liked.
Participants
with relfies and
dyadic relationship statuses were judged to have higher quality
relationships (satisfaction and commitment).
A partial correlation was used to investigate the
relationship between mindfulness, as measured by the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory, and
relationship satisfaction, as measured by the Revised
Dyadic Adjustment Scale, while controlling for life satisfaction, as measured by the Satisfaction
with Life Scale.
The capacity to form
dyadic relationships is present from birth; identification
with a group develops more slowly.
With a third person in the room, however, the
dyadic interactions can be explored from a perspective of someone who stands outside the negative
relationship dynamic itself.
Relationship quality can be measured
with the
Dyadic Relationship Scale.
Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy facilitates safety and new learning through the
relationship that the abused and neglected child has
with his therapist and actively works to replicate the characteristics of this
relationship with one or more of the child's attachment figures in his daily life.
Later studies might look at the same issue
with couples to better analyze
dyadic relationships.
(2) If attachment patterns reflect
relationship characteristics rather than traits in the child, one would expect that characteristics of
dyadic interaction would be associated
with patterns of attachment.
With respect to the
dyadic analyses, we hypothesized socialization effects of alcohol misuse across different stable
dyadic relationships, both unilateral and reciprocal.
Significant group differences were found indicating lower stress associated
with the marital
relationship and more functional self - reported and observed
dyadic coping among those in maritally non-distressed couples compared to those in maritally distressed dyads.
With regard to the social structure of the
relationships, female adolescents tend to prefer and interact more frequently in
dyadic relationships, whereas male adolescents engage more often in
relationships within larger peer groups (e.g., Benenson 1990; Markovits et al. 2001).
These findings are partially in line
with prior research suggesting that female adolescents may be more likely to conform to their friend's behaviors within
dyadic and close
relationships, and male adolescents in larger peer groups (Berndt and Keefe 1995).
These processes take place when people directly interact
with and disclose to each other within
dyadic relationships.
Relationship of
dyadic closeness
with work - related stress: a daily diary study.
These differences may be understood in the light of gender differences in peer
relationships, indicating that female rather than male adolescents tend to spend more time in
dyadic interactions
with their friends (for a review, see Rose and Rudolph 2006).
Second,
dyadic coping (e.g. Bodenmann, 2000), defined as shared competencies in couples to cope together
with daily stress, has been shown to be an important resource in managing both depressive symptoms and
relationship well - being (Beach et al., 2014; Bodenmann, Pihet & Kaiser 2006; Bodenmann et al., 2008).
Indeed, maternal and paternal PPD and its consequences have mostly been studied separately, leading to the construction of
dyadic models of the consequences of parental PPD,
with linear transmission processes to the child entailed in separate mother — child or father — child
relationships.
The interwoven nature of individual and relational distress, at both a
dyadic (couple and parental) and whole family level, in conjunction
with awareness of the critical importance of social support for post-trauma wellbeing (Saltzman et al. 2009), supports the contention that Systemic Psychotherapy
with its focus on strengthening
relationships and interactional processes
with significant others as a means to support individual recovery and family resilience (Walsh 2016) would appear to have a valuable contribution to make to trauma recovery.
As
with dyadic partnerships (couples), other healthy
relationship configurations need to operate from a place of secure - functioning, which means the individuals feel emotionally attuned to, safe, trusted and trusting, respected and together in this adventure of a
relationship and life.
Several years ago, Dr. Baylin began a collaborative
relationship with Daniel Hughes, a leader in the field of attachment - focused therapy and the developer of
Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy or DDP, a highly regarded model of treatment for maltreated children and their caregivers.
Equally important is the identification of child characteristics that predict positive
dyadic and group
relationships in children
with ADHD as they grow older.
Multiple regression and structural equation modelling showed that partners in interethnic
relationships defined personal commitment in different ways
with men emphasizing love and
dyadic adjustment, and women emphasizing love and acculturation to their partner.
It consists of three scales: a General Scale (40 items), in which family members evaluate the family as a system, a
Dyadic Relationships Scale (28 items), in which they assess their
relationship with their partner, and a Self - Rating Scale (28 items), measuring individuals» perceptions of their functioning in the family.
Specifically, we illustrate the potential value of this new approach by identifying a taxonomy of dyad - level subtypes that differ in how their emotions (i.e., multiple within - day ratings of happiness — chosen here as an exemplar variable
with variance properties useful for methods development) vary through normal daily life, and examine how that taxonomy is related to a set of theoretically meaningful variables — subjective health,
dyadic adjustment (agreement on amount of time spent
with partner), and
relationship satisfaction, all of which constitute important characteristics of older couples» well - being (Hoppmann & Gerstorf, 2016).