Not exact matches
Dynamic testing of seats /
head restraints requires a dummy with a realistic spine and neck.
The device on which
dynamic tests of seats /
head restraints are conducted is a steel flatbed sled that runs on fixed rails.
A seat /
head restraint's
dynamic rating depends on performance in the sled
test.
«Still it's encouraging that the seat /
head restraint combinations in only 7 of the models we evaluated didn't make it to the
dynamic test because of marginal geometry,» Lund says.
The Institute's
dynamic ratings of good, acceptable, marginal, or poor are derived from two seat design parameters (peak acceleration of the dummy's torso and time from impact initiation to
head restraint contact with the dummy's
head) plus neck tension and shear forces recorded on BioRID during the
test.
IIWPG conducted extensive research and
testing to develop the procedures for the
dynamic tests and evaluation criteria used by member research groups, including the Institute, to rate the performance of seat /
head restraint combinations in vehicles sold in a number of world markets.
All of these seat /
head restraint combinations earn overall ratings based on both geometry and
dynamic test results.
2018 IIHS Top Safety Pick + when equipped with optional Automatic Emergency Braking and LED headlights with
Dynamic Bending Lights on vehicles built after September 2017 To qualify for 2018 TOP SAFETY PICK +, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and
head restraint tests, as well as an acceptable or good rating in the passenger - side small overlap front
test.
2018 IIHS Top Safety Pick when equipped with optional Automatic Emergency Braking and HID headlights with
Dynamic Bending Lights To qualify for 2018 TOP SAFETY PICK, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and
head restraint tests.
2018 IIHS Top Safety Pick + when equipped with optional Automatic Emergency Braking and HID headlights with
Dynamic Bending Lights To qualify for 2018 TOP SAFETY PICK +, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and
head restraint tests, as well as an acceptable or good rating in the passenger - side small overlap front
test.
To do this, the Institute will conduct
dynamic tests of the seat /
head restraint combinations.
Rear crash protection is rated according to
head restraint height and horizontal distance behind the
head of an average - size man plus performance in a
dynamic test that measures forces on the neck during a rear impact.
A proposed upgrade to the federal standard on
head restraints likely would reduce neck injuries, but a
dynamic -
testing option included in the proposal could compromise safety.
As more
restraints with good geometry are introduced and the number of active
head restraint systems increases, there's a need for
dynamic testing to assess the overall performance of seats and
head restraints in reducing whiplash injury risk.
A new crash
test sled being installed at the Institute's Vehicle Research Center will facilitate
dynamic testing of seats and
head restraints without crashing cars.
A new crash
test sled at the Vehicle Research Center will allow for
dynamic testing of
head restraints and seats, as well as other
testing that doesn't require a whole vehicle.
Using a new
dynamic test and a dummy designed especially for rear impact
testing, IIHS has rated 73 seat /
head restraint combinations available in 63 car models sold in the U.S. market.
This
test uses both geometry and
dynamic ratings to determine if a
head restraint is effective.
The Institute's
dynamic ratings of good, acceptable, marginal, or poor are derived from two seat design parameters (peak acceleration of the dummy's torso and time from impact initiation to
head restraint contact with the dummy's
head) plus neck tension and shear forces recorded on the BioRID dummy during the
test.
Euro NCAP's
test procedure was developed to take into account both the geometrical aspects of the seat, the size and shape of the
head restraint and its proximity to the occupant, and its
dynamic performance during an actual crash
test.
However, the car did not qualify for the AEB points as its front seats and
head restraints did not score highly enough in the
dynamic whiplash
tests.