One central one for me was the day in 2006 when, at a workshop for the Donella Meadows Leadership Fellows program where I was a trainer and Peter Senge a guest presenter, Peter said, «We need to get more system
dynamics models of climate out there in the world, making a difference.
One central one for me was the day in 2006 when, at a workshop for the Donella Meadows Leadership Fellows program where I was a trainer and Peter Senge a guest presenter, Peter said, «We need to get more system
dynamics models of climate out there in the world, -LSB-...]
Not exact matches
A better understanding
of the heating distributions required to robustly simulate strong MJOs in
climate models will improve insights into the
dynamics of the
climate system and projections
of future
climate.
However, most
climate system
models have not done a good job
of showing the relationship between permafrost and soil carbon
dynamics.
In a recent paper titled, «Demarcating circulation regimes
of synchronously rotating terrestrial planets within the habitable zone,» my co-authors and I analyze a set
of climate model calculations to examine the dependence upon stellar effective temperature
of the atmospheric
dynamics of planets as they move closer to the inner edge
of the habitable zone.
However, to make
climate models more accurate, we are focused on developing a better understanding
of the
dynamics of organic aerosols formed from plant - based organic vapors and their interaction with aerosols emitted from human activities,» said Dr. Chen Song, a PNNL atmospheric scientist.
The researchers then employed a number
of scientific theories and a set
of sophisticated calculations to arrive at a mathematical framework to diagnose how
climate model resolution affected the simulation
of the location and
dynamics of the jet stream.
To put it another way, modern
climate models are simulations
of physics — thermodynamics, fluid
dynamics, some chemistry, and in some cases a little simulated biology.
Employs the use
of climate models to better understand the
dynamics of climate systems and weather and to predict future
climate.
We therefore
model the lag
of juvenile
climate dynamics over a plausible range
of values, allowing the
models to optimize the lag distance for the Japan regional total series.
There is still uncertainty about many aspects
of the
dynamics of climate change, and this will only be addressed by investment in
climate models and the top -
of - the - range supercomputers needed to run them.
The GISS Global
Climate Model (GCM) is already made up
of hundreds
of thousands
of lines
of computer code, and now it will be expanded substantially to allow for the 3D visualization
of exoplanet
climates and planetary
dynamics as well.
1) global
climate model - driven projections
of thermal expansion, atmosphere / ocean
dynamics, and glacier melt,
Global
climate models are the scientific community's best tools for understanding the detailed
dynamics of the global
climate system and the way those
dynamics change in response to greenhouse gas emissions and other human activities.
At the same time, increasing depth and duration
of drought, along with warmer temperatures enabling the spread
of pine beetles has increased the flammability
of this forest region — http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v1/n9/full/nclimate1293.html http://www.vancouversun.com/fires+through+tinder+pine+beetle+killed+forests/10047293/story.html Can
climate models give different TCR and ECS with different timing / extent
of when or how much boreal forest burns, and how the soot generated alters the date
of an ice free Arctic Ocean or the rate
of Greenland ice melt and its influence on long term
dynamics of the AMOC transport
of heat?
The
model employed is an intermediate - complexity Earth system
model which accounts for the main ocean
dynamics and biogeochemistry
of the Cretaceous
climate.
Seems like the
climate models may describe a part
of the
climate system, i.e. how a the current basin
of attraction will shift
dynamics based on various forcings.
It was a good deed to give Dennis Schmitt a forum to respond to Patrick Michaels since Michaels doesn't offer one, we need to see less
of the tug
of war and more
of the real evolving science as scientists strive to fill in gaps in data and missing links in
climate models, and to understand feedbacks and the coupled
dynamics of land, air and water.
This is a bit off topic, but, all this discussion
of solar forcing has made me realize I don't have a good short - form mental
model of transient
climate dynamics.
General question: being familiar with computational fluid
dynamics in the combustion world, I would like to know a few general details
of the
climate models.
In super-parameterized
climate models, thousands
of embedded idealized two - dimensional cloud process - resolving
model arrays are used to calculate sub-grid cloud and boundary layer adjustments to resolved
dynamics, instead
of conventional statistical parameterizations.
Dear RC, Is it not possible that scientists and mathematicians from the science
of non linear
dynamics (which maths I am presuming is being used in the maths
of climate models) to shed light on the amplification and dampening
of the
climates feedback cycles and hence the so called «sensitivity» issue and hence the possible range
of temperatures?
The response
of low clouds to warming is uncertain because the
dynamics governing low clouds occur on scales
of tens
of meters, whereas
climate models have horizontal grid spacings
of 50 — 100 km (see the sketch at the top).
My point was that, if we accept this basic story (it's too simple, even as an account
of how cultural cognition works; but that's in the nature
of «
models» & should give us pause only when the simplification detracts from rather than enhances our ability to predict and manage the
dynamics of the phenomenon in question), then there's no reason to view the valences
of the cultural meanings attached to crediting
climate change risk as fixed or immutable.
This uncertainty is attributable to the inadequate resolution
of climate models for resolving the small - scale turbulent
dynamics of MBL clouds.
Do they actually think they can «
model» something as complex as the
climate and fluid
dynamics of an entire planet and make such predictions accurately?
Syllabus: Lecture 1: Introduction to Global Atmospheric
Modelling Lecture 2: Types
of Atmospheric and
Climate Models Lecture 3: Energy Balance
Models Lecture 4: 1D Radiative - Convective
Models Lecture 5: General Circulation
Models (GCMs) Lecture 6: Atmospheric Radiation Budget Lecture 7:
Dynamics of the Atmosphere Lecture 8: Parametrizations
of Subgrid - Scale Physical Processes Lecture 9: Chemistry
of the Atmosphere Lecture 10: Basic Methods
of Solving
Model Equations Lecture 11: Coupled Chemistry -
Climate Models (CCMs) Lecture 12: Applications
of CCMs: Recent developments
of atmospheric
dynamics and chemistry Lecture 13: Applications
of CCMs: Future Polar Ozone Lecture 14: Applications
of CCMs: Impact
of Transport Emissions Lecture 15: Towards an Earth System
Model
Coverage includes original paleoclimatic, diagnostic, analytical and numerical
modeling research on the structure and behavior
of the atmosphere, oceans, cryosphere, biomass and land surface as interacting components
of the
dynamics of global
climate.
Are we the only scientists that can see how silly it is to argue about statistics on
climate sensitivity being computed using a
climate model that does not even remotely accurately describe the
dynamics and physics
of the atmosphere?
The little known Hurst standard deviations due to Hurst - Kolmogorov
dynamics (a.k.a.
climate persistence) are much higher than Markovian variations and typically TWICE as large as commonly calculated standard deviations
of random «white noise» in
climate models.
I might as well label you an idiot for using it, when you've never met me, have no idea
of my competence or the strength
of my arguments for or against any aspect
of climate dynamics (because on this list I argue both points
of view as the science demands and am just as vigorous in smacking down bullshit physics used to challenge some aspect
of CAGW as I am to question the physics or statistical analysis or
modelling used to «prove» it).
We use the large - eddy simulation code PyCLES to simulate the
dynamics of clouds and boundary layers, to elucidate their response to
climate changes, and to develop closure schemes for representing their smaller - scale
dynamics in larger - scale
climate and weather forecasting
models.
In
climate models however you have to botch smaller scale weather
dynamics into «parameterized physics», and stabilize behavior
of initially non-viscous Eulerian - based «core» with artificial dampings.
Prediction Continued improvements in
modeling decadal - scale
dynamics — and longer, when ice - sheet and deep - ocean
dynamics are included — will continue to affirm the multi-decade arc
of strong
climate science that concludes «Hansen's worldview is right.»
I have not done much fluid
dynamics research since the 1980's, but I keep up with the literature, and much
of my current research is on the interpretation
of weather and
climate model ensembles.
It is easy to imagine, due the amount
of the world that is ocean, that a
model that well captures ocean / atmosphere
dynamics is a significantly good
model of predicting global
climate even if it does poorly over land.
As the relatively new science
of climate dynamics evolved through the 1980s and 1990s, it became quite clear from observational data, both instrumental and paleoclimatic, as well as
model studies that Earth's
climate never was and is unlikely to ever be in equilibrium.
This simulation with a comprehensive coupled
climate model illustrates and expands upon the
dynamics discussed in the context
of an aquaplanet atmosphere - only
model in Merlis and Schneider (2010).
This unique dataset
of global inundation
dynamics is crucial to various applications including hydrological and methane
modeling, water management, and
climate modeling.
By the time
of the TAR, several
climate models incorporated physically based treatments
of ice
dynamics, although the land ice processes were only rudimentary.
On the BBC's Today Programme this morning, Tim Palmer, professor
of climate dynamics and predictability at Oxford University explained how stronger storms are what scientists and
models expect with
climate change.
(2) You again quote T. Howard et al suggesting this
modeling exercise, with limited validation
of the
models, demonstrates something about the performance
of future ocean /
climate dynamics.
Researchers at CIRES» National Snow and Ice Data Center [About NSIDC] investigate the
dynamics of Antarctic ice shelves, new techniques for the remote sensing
of snow and freeze / thaw cycle
of soils, the role
of snow in hydrologic
modeling, linkages between changes in sea ice extent and weather patterns, large - scale shifts in polar
climate, river and lake ice, and the distribution and characteristics
of seasonally and permanently frozen ground.
Modeling of the recent decadal climate record would require careful accounting for all of the radiative forcings, and would also require accurate modeling of ocean dynamics to accurately simulate the climate system's respon
Modeling of the recent decadal
climate record would require careful accounting for all
of the radiative forcings, and would also require accurate
modeling of ocean dynamics to accurately simulate the climate system's respon
modeling of ocean
dynamics to accurately simulate the
climate system's response time.
Nine global vegetation
models (GVMs)(meaning vegetation processes are simulated, but not necessarily vegetation
dynamics), four
of which were DGVMs, were used in the Coupled
Climate — Carbon Cycle
Model Intercomparison Project (3).
«The authors write that North Pacific Decadal Variability (NPDV) «is a key component in predictability studies
of both regional and global
climate change,»... they emphasize that given the links between both the PDO and the NPGO with global
climate, the accurate characterization and the degree
of predictability
of these two modes in coupled
climate models is an important «open question in
climate dynamics» that needs to be addressed... report that
model - derived «temporal and spatial statistics
of the North Pacific Ocean modes exhibit significant discrepancies from observations in their twentieth - century
climate... conclude that «for implications on future
climate change, the coupled
climate models show no consensus on projected future changes in frequency
of either the first or second leading pattern
of North Pacific SST anomalies,» and they say that «the lack
of a consensus in changes in either mode also affects confidence in projected changes in the overlying atmospheric circulation.»»
Abstract The purpose
of this review - and - research paper is twofold: (i) to review the role played in
climate dynamics by fluid - dynamical
models; and (ii) to contribute to the understanding and reduction
of the uncertainties in future
climate - change projections.
The research was conducted with the use
of a system
dynamics model, based on the award - winning
Climate Rapid Overview and Decision Support (C - ROADS) simulator.
«While the melting
of Antarctic ice shelves is contributing to rising sea levels and other
climate change
dynamics in complex ways, this additional role
of removing carbon from the atmosphere may have implications for global
climate models that need to be further studied,»
JIGSAW (GEO) is designed to produce very high - quality Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi tessellations appropriate for unstructured finite - volume / element type
models of planetary
climate dynamics.