Sentences with phrase «e-books than physical books»

All those happy recipients of a holiday Kindle fired up their shiny new device and began purchasing e-books, making Christmas day the first day customers purchased more e-books than physical books.

This was after Amazon stated that they were selling more e-books than physical books.

Not exact matches

«Since it's easier, faster and cheaper to create an e-book than it is a physical book, Kindle owners will get to read the seventh Jack Daniels before everyone ebook than it is a physical book, Kindle owners will get to read the seventh Jack Daniels before everyone else.

Godin's decision is also backed up by sales successes like Amazon's Kindle e-reader, Apple's iPad, and even reports like this one that suggest the e-book revolution is redefining the nature of reading itself, and reading e-books means readers are less isolated than if they were reading a physical bbook revolution is redefining the nature of reading itself, and reading e-books means readers are less isolated than if they were reading a physical book.

Further, e-books * ARE * worth less than physical books for the very fact that they are not physbooks * ARE * worth less than physical books for the very fact that they are not physical.

In fact, some suggest that e-book covers are just as important than those on physical books, because online buyers are presented with a myriad of thumbnail images when browsing on the most popular sites.

Amazon also points out that e-books are cheaper to produce than physical bbooks are cheaper to produce than physical books.

E-books also are considerably cheaper to produce and distribute than physical (or «print») bbooks also are considerably cheaper to produce and distribute than physical (or «print») books.

«The teenagers commented they appreciated the physical and sensory lure of a real book, and said printed texts are often more accessible and easier to handle than e-books.

In nearly all cases, reading e-books means giving up more privacy than browsing through a physical bookstore or library, or reading a paper book in your own home.

The authors point out that Amazon now controls the sale of more than 75 percent of online sales of physical books; more than 65 percent of e-book sales; more than 40 percent of sales of new books; and about 85 percent of e-book sales of self - published titles.

Book pirates spent around # 27.46 on average on digital and physical books than those who accessed all their e-books legally, who claimed to spent # 23.77 on avebooks legally, who claimed to spent # 23.77 on average.

The Kindle rapidly grew the company's e-book business, and Amazon said in May that it was selling more e-books than physical copies of bbooks than physical copies of books.

Self publishing an e-book is considerably cheaper than self publishing physical books, and a great deal of it can be done on your own.

Treating your content — both physical books and e-books — as bookware, rather than as something visionary or revered, solves a number of probbooks — as bookware, rather than as something visionary or revered, solves a number of problems.

As far as readers are concerned, the incremental cost to produce more copies of an e-book is zero.So the readers expect an eBook to be priced less than a physical bbook is zero.So the readers expect an eBook to be priced less than a physical book.

Physical books, however, do cost more to produce than e-booksbooks.

Since consumers almost always have the option to read books in physical formats, they are indicating a preference to return to print... Overall, 14 % of book buyers said they are now reading fewer e-books than when they started reading books in the format, and 59 % percent of those who said they are reading fewer e-books cited a preference for print as the main reason for switching back to physical bbooks than when they started reading books in the format, and 59 % percent of those who said they are reading fewer e-books cited a preference for print as the main reason for switching back to physical bbooks cited a preference for print as the main reason for switching back to physical books.

Barnes & Noble now represents more than 25 percent of all of the U.S. market for e-books, more than the company's share of physical books, and it sells twice the number of e-books as physical books, at least onbooks, more than the company's share of physical books, and it sells twice the number of e-books as physical books, at least onbooks as physical books, at least online.

Barnes and Noble recently said that it sells more e-books than it does physical books on BNbooks than it does physical books on BN.com.

Creating an e-book is actually quite a bit simpler than creating a physical bbook is actually quite a bit simpler than creating a physical book.

If I was able to buy an e-book once for both of us, like I can for a physical book, then e-books would make an awful lot more sense than they do book once for both of us, like I can for a physical book, then e-books would make an awful lot more sense than they do now.

Since distributing e-books is so much cheaper and simpler than distributing physical books to bookstores, there are fewer barriers to entry and much easier discobooks is so much cheaper and simpler than distributing physical books to bookstores, there are fewer barriers to entry and much easier discovery.

For example, promotions on children's books do not perform well (the ROI was -39 %), probably because most parents (like me) buy physical books rather than e-booksbooks.

Amazon controls more than 40 percent of total book sales in the U.S., 75 percent of online sales of physical books, and 65 percent of the e-book marbook market.

Since e-book readers can store thousands of books, they eliminate the need for physical storage and give children, parents and schools access to a much wider selection books than what may be physically available in their communities.

e-book content rather than a physical copy of the book,» she sbook content rather than a physical copy of the book,» she said.

While e-book prices are on average 20 - 30 percent lower than those of physical books, they save publishers the cost of storing and moving books around, and reduce the working capital tied up in inventory.

Speaking of the Nook, B&N boasted that just nine months since its launch of the e-reader, and one year after it entered the e-book arena, the company has already achieved greater market share in digital books than it has in physical books.

Many e-book sales will not cannibalize physical book sales, and so publishers will overall be selling more than befbook sales will not cannibalize physical book sales, and so publishers will overall be selling more than before.

Of course, buying physical books is still the best option for many bookworms out there, in part because nothing can replace the sheer tactical feeling of flipping through pages, but jumping into e-books is more than decent a recobooks is more than decent a recourse.

A paperback does give some kudos to you as an author (there is something magical about holding a book you've written), and some readers prefer a physical book, but the income from a paperback is significantly lower than from an e-bookbook.