Sentences with phrase «earlier federal court decision»

The court also disagreed with an earlier Federal Court decision that touched on this issue in the context of metatags: see Red Label Vacations Inc. v 411 Travel Buys Limited, 2015 FC 18 at para. 115, aff'd 2015 FCA 290.

Not exact matches

The U.S. Federal Reserve says it will appeal an earlier decision from the U.S. District Court that challenged the swipe - fee regulations set by the central bank.

says the decisions behind a landmark High Court ruling earlier this year provides the impetus for the Federal Government to reform electoral laws.

A federal court ruling today found supermarket magnate and Republican mayoral candidate John Catsimitidis violated labor law by failing to pay his employees overtime, upholding an earlier court's decision that the businessman was responsible for the failing to properly compensate employees.

Governor of Abia Okezie Ikpeazu got a relief today as the Court of Appeal in Abuja ruled in his favour setting aside an earlier decision of a Federal High Court which found him guilty of filing false tax returns.

Former Gov. George Pataki issued a victory statement in response to a Virginia federal judge's decision earlier today that the Obama administration's health care law is unconstitutional — a move that brings this dispute one step closer to being settled by the US Supreme Court.

Earlier this month, Spitzer ran into former Bruno press secretary John McArdle in Manhattan and asked how Bruno, whose conviction in 2009 on two counts of federal «honest services» fraud was thrown out based on a US Supreme Court decision, was doing.

The restraining orders of the Federal High Court in Lagos formed the ground for the July 1, 2015 decision of the Federal High Court in Abuja to dismiss the earlier extradition proceedings instituted against the serving senator.

At the resumed hearing of the earlier charge of possession of illegal firearms filed against Dasuki yesterday, Justice Ademola Adeniyi of the Federal High Court Six, sitting in Abuja expressed surprise at the decision of prosecution counsel to bring additional charges against immediate past National Security Adviser (NSA) on a day set aside for definite hearing on the one count charge preferred against him.

Australia's Full Federal Court this week began proceedings in an appeal of an earlier decision that upheld the validity of breast cancer diagnostic tests developed by Myriad Genetics — the same tests that were the subject of oral argument before the U.S. high court earlier this Court this week began proceedings in an appeal of an earlier decision that upheld the validity of breast cancer diagnostic tests developed by Myriad Genetics — the same tests that were the subject of oral argument before the U.S. high court earlier this court earlier this week.

A three - judge panel in the Court of Appeals overturned the federal district court decision earlier this mCourt of Appeals overturned the federal district court decision earlier this mcourt decision earlier this month.

Most states have already dramatically increased their spending on education and have poured considerable resources into testing programs - changes driven by earlier federal initiatives, state - level policy, and court decisions, not NCLB.

And the magnet movement got an early boost from two federal district court decisions in 1976, in the aftermath of the discord in Charlotte and Boston.

We wrote here earlier this week about the Catholic connection — University of Chicago law professor Geoffrey R. Stone's post at the American Constitution Society's ACSBlog in which he suggests that religious affiliation may be the key to explaining last week's Supreme Court decision in Gonzales v. Carhart, upholding a federal law prohibiting so - called partial birth abortions.

Facing the question whether the TTAB's earlier decision on the issue of likelihood of confusion should have been binding on the district court, the Supreme Court held that decisions by the TTAB may be binding on a federal district court considering the same or similar icourt, the Supreme Court held that decisions by the TTAB may be binding on a federal district court considering the same or similar iCourt held that decisions by the TTAB may be binding on a federal district court considering the same or similar icourt considering the same or similar issue.

The 6 - 3 decision released this morning in R v. Nur and R v. Charles upheld earlier rulings of the Ontario Court of Appeal and struck down another aspect of the federal government's crime legislation.

Earlier this year, the Federal Court of Appeal, in Bristol - Myers Squibb Canada Co. v. Teva Canada Limited, 2017 FCA 76 at 65, directly addressed the impact of the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Sanofi on obviousness and held that:

The Federal Court of Appeal recognized this power in 1989 in its decision in Kahlon v. MEI [1989] FCJ no. 104, when, citing from Justice Thurlow in an earlier decision, it held that the issue was not whether the decision made by a visa officer that an applicant was in a prohibited class (inadmissible) was correct but whether the person was in fact one of the prohibited class.

I think it would, in fact, be quite interesting to know how much attention the Federal Court of Appeal pays to earlier decisions of the provincial court of appeal of a province from which it is hearing the Court of Appeal pays to earlier decisions of the provincial court of appeal of a province from which it is hearing the court of appeal of a province from which it is hearing the case.

Catherine Farrelly was quoted by Law360 in reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling stating that federal court decisions on «likelihood of confusion» can be precluded by earlier findings on the same issue from the Trademark Trial and Appeal BCourt ruling stating that federal court decisions on «likelihood of confusion» can be precluded by earlier findings on the same issue from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Bcourt decisions on «likelihood of confusion» can be precluded by earlier findings on the same issue from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

On June 8, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit again considered one of the earliest final decisions from the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board («PTAB» or «Board») in an inter partes review proceeding under the Leahy - Smith America Invents Act of 2011 («AIA»).

Presumably in an effort to get earlier and ultimately more attention from the Supreme Court clerks evaluating cert petitions, Samsung yesterday filed (once agai well ahead of a deadline) an optional reply brief in support of its request that the Supreme Court review the Federal Circuit's en banc decision in the second Apple v. Samsung case (this post continues below the document):

The use of TAR have been accepted by courts in various jurisdictions - firstly with several US cases, then in early 2016 in the UK with the High Court Phrrho Investments Ltd v MWB Property LTD case [2016] EWHC 256 (Cth), and finally in December 2016 in Australia in a decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria (McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Santam Ltd & Ors (No 1)[2016] VSC 734), and orders in a Federal Court of Australia matter (Money Max Int v QBE Insurance, VID513 / 2015) relating to the TAR algorithms used and methodology in the training and validation.

For my earlier post on the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Clyde River see here and for my note on the two leave to appeal applications see here.

Further, courts are now more likely than they were before Dunsmuir to uphold the decision — on average for 71 % of the issues reviewed in Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, Alberta and the federal courts, as compared to in 66 % of the cases reviewed in our earlier study.

Following an earlier Federal Court of Appeal decision, Justice Roy reasoned that «without any reference to studies that will show, once they have to be produced, the existence of the promised utility, how is the public to know that utility is demonstrated.»

Earlier this year, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld part of the decision.

Earlier this week, a Federal Court ruled in A.T. v. Globe24h.com that a Romanian website violated Canadian privacy laws, and the accepted protocol for online publication of court records, when it scraped Canadian court decisions from CanLII and other sites and then republished them in a manner searchable by GoCourt ruled in A.T. v. Globe24h.com that a Romanian website violated Canadian privacy laws, and the accepted protocol for online publication of court records, when it scraped Canadian court decisions from CanLII and other sites and then republished them in a manner searchable by Gocourt records, when it scraped Canadian court decisions from CanLII and other sites and then republished them in a manner searchable by Gocourt decisions from CanLII and other sites and then republished them in a manner searchable by Google.

In a suit by Canada Post, the trial court decided that the USPS was not a «public authority» for the purposes of this act, and the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that decision earlier this court decided that the USPS was not a «public authority» for the purposes of this act, and the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that decision earlier this Court of Appeal confirmed that decision earlier this year.

In Iggillis Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2018 FCA 51 (CanLII), a highly anticipated decision released earlier this month, the Federal Court of Appeal overturned a Federal Court decision which found that common interest privilege «is not a legitimate or acceptable application of solicitor - client privilege».

Announced earlier this month, the case of NASA v Nelson resulted in a unanimous decision by the Supreme Court to allow the standard federal employment background check — typically the National Agency Check... Read more»

The background to the case is complicated, with multiple Federal Court decisions handed down since the application was made in early 1994.

A federal appeals court reversed and held that the property owners could challenge the JDs in court — click here to read more about the earlier decision.

Based on the determination that the ban on independent expenditures is unconstitutional, the Court overruled earlier decisions that had allowed a ban on corporate - sponsored independent expenditures in federal elections.

In a case previously summarized in the The Letter of the Law, a New York federal court has considered whether a jury properly awarded damages to a handicapped individual who was alleging discrimination against an apartment - locating service - click here to read the earlier decision in this case.

Federal appellate court reverses its earlier decision and determines that arbitrator's failure to disclose his minimal contact with prevailing party's attorney did not require vacating an arbitration award.

Rather the decision referred to an earlier case that held «In extraordinary cases» a court should «hesitate before concluding that Congress has intended such an implicit delegation» to a federal agency.