On the whole this sufficed in
the earlier Social Gospel.
Not exact matches
Almost forgotten in the last two decades of his life and completely forgotten today except by students of American religious history, Ward was a nationally prominent radical in the
early twentieth - century tradition of Walter Rauschenbusch's
Social Gospel movement.
Social - Gospel advocates in the early twentieth century and their mainline children continued to view Christianity's role in the project of American civil religion in terms of the social impact of its moral v
Social -
Gospel advocates in the
early twentieth century and their mainline children continued to view Christianity's role in the project of American civil religion in terms of the
social impact of its moral v
social impact of its moral vision.
In the enthusiasm of the
early days of the «
social gospel» it was natural to take these two parables as referring to a gradual transformation of all
social relations and institutions according to the will of God.
Encompassing the
Social Gospel movement of the
early twentieth century and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops at the beginning of the twenty - first, this project has transcended the historical and theological division between Catholics and Protestants.
The
Social Gospel was adopted by many Protestant churches in the late 19th and
early 20th century, says Bass, the church historian.
As we saw, the
early missionaries were evangelists and
social reformers in one, because they believed that both functions belonged together in the message of the
gospel.
As for
early influences, probably no one has directed my thinking more than Walter Rauschenbusch, a Baptist minister who was born in 1861 in upstate New York, and whose emphasis on the
social gospel and the church of Love rather than the Church of Law spoke to me in seminary in a way that changed my thinking forever.
The difference lies mainly in the fact that the
earlier exponents of the
social gospel thought of the coming of the kingdom of God as progressive growth toward a better world through the conquest of these
social evils.
It was appropriate, then, for
early 20th - century
Social Gospel theologians like Walter Rauschenbusch to observe how prejudice and social discrimination are passed from one generation to the next, and it is consistent for theologians today to incorporate observations about social inheritance — what liberation theologians and feminist theologians call «social location» or «systemic evil» — into our understanding of the human cond
Social Gospel theologians like Walter Rauschenbusch to observe how prejudice and
social discrimination are passed from one generation to the next, and it is consistent for theologians today to incorporate observations about social inheritance — what liberation theologians and feminist theologians call «social location» or «systemic evil» — into our understanding of the human cond
social discrimination are passed from one generation to the next, and it is consistent for theologians today to incorporate observations about
social inheritance — what liberation theologians and feminist theologians call «social location» or «systemic evil» — into our understanding of the human cond
social inheritance — what liberation theologians and feminist theologians call «
social location» or «systemic evil» — into our understanding of the human cond
social location» or «systemic evil» — into our understanding of the human condition.
Writing in the year 2096, Rorty says: «In the churches, the «
social gospel» theology of the
early twentieth century has been rediscovered.
Many ministers discerned the vital need of
social action in the time of the liberal
social gospel in the
earlier part of this century.
Their attempts to adhere, however inconsistently, to a religious tradition she vigorously faults as a failure of political engagement, negatively contrasting this contemporary men's movement with the
Social Gospel movement that arose
early in the century.
Expanding from a Jewish to a Gentile world the
early church concluded that no legalism, Judaic or Gentile, was adequate to fulfill the
gospel standard of agape, that the Kingdom of God was already present and yet to come, and that in living the
gospel in this world with its political, economic and
social challenges would require faithfulness and patience.
Many of the
early leaders of the
social gospel movement were pastors whose concern for individual slum dwellers, the poor, the prisoners and the sick led them to attack the
social sources of human misery and to understand the corporate character of human sin.
Every movement to make America more fully realize its professed values has grown out of some form of public theology, from the abolitionists to the
social gospel and the
early socialist party to the civil rights movement under Martin Luther King and the farm workers» movement under Caesar Chavez.
The «
social gospel», transmitted to American theology by Walter Rausenbusch
earlier in this century, drew much from Enlightenment theology but little, if anything, from pietism.
Walter Rauschenbusch, the leading interpreter of the
social gospel in the
early 20th century, is recognized to have the Kingdom of God as his major concept.
Henry rejected liberal versions of the
social gospel which tended to be all
social and no
gospel, but he appealed to an
earlier evangelical consensus of cultural engagement that included the work of William Wilberforce in campaigning for the abolition of the slave trade in England, the revivalist impulses of Charles G. Finney against slavery in this country, as well as evangelical concerns for suffrage, temperance, child labor laws, fair wages for workers, and many other progressive issues to which many theologically conservative Christians were once committed» before what David Moberg has called «the great reversal,» an evangelical withdrawal from such concerns.