Matthew Flinn posted here recently on
an earlier decision in this case, PJS (22 January 2016), in which the Court of Appeal granted an interim injunction banning revelation of PJS's extra-marital ventures.
Click here to read
the earlier decisions in this case.
In a case previously summarized in the The Letter of the Law, a New York federal court has considered whether a jury properly awarded damages to a handicapped individual who was alleging discrimination against an apartment - locating service - click here to read
the earlier decision in this case.
Click here to read a summary of
the earlier decision in this case...
Click here to read a summary of
the earlier decisions in this case.
Not exact matches
And the Viacom CEO is caught
in a Catch - 22 of his own making:
Earlier this year, he maintained
in a court
case launched by the billionaire's former girlfriend that Redstone was fully capable of making
decisions.
A ruling against Aereo would conflict with its
earlier decision in the Cablevision
case, the majority said.
Having referred to the constitutional protection given
in earlier cases to «personal
decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education,» the opinion stated:
In cases like these, where the evidence of manuscripts, versions and
early quotations is fairly straightforward, it is relatively easy to make
decisions about the nature of the original, or more original, text.
Background I outlined the Tribunal's Tabcorp
decision in an
earlier blog (Tribunal Clears Tabcorp / Tatts Merger (ACL Blog, 30 June 2017)-RRB- and provided some more detailed information and
case extracts on my my Tabcorp
case page).
Earlier this offseason it looked as if Notre Dame transfer Malik Zaire was going to be their guy, but redshirt freshman Felipe Franks has made his own
case, leaving head coach Jim McElwain still up
in the air on a
decision.
The study's senior author, Associate Professor Natasha Nassar from the University of Sydney Menzies Centre for Health Policy said: «While the association between being born
earlier — lower gestational age — and poorer developmental outcomes is well established, our results revealed that poor development is further exacerbated
in the
case of planned birth, where a considered
decision made to deliver an infant determines gestational age.
For him, this
decision to vacate the
earlier ruling
in spite of the
cases at the Supreme Court is «calculated to interfere with, prejudice and also to undermine the outcome of the two applications pending before this Honourable Court.»
Cuomo's preferred slate to run the Women's Equality Party got a boost from an appellate court
decision, but a ruling on a similar
case is due
early next week
in Rochester.
But the groundbreaking
decision in the Vergara
case makes it clear that
early, and effectively irreversible,
decisions about teacher tenure have real costs for students and ultimately all of society.
Early reaction from major players include the following: The New York Times called Vergara «a
decision that hands teachers» unions a major defeat
in a landmark
case.»
«Given that only two
in 10 children have access to a high - quality
early education setting in the U.S., CEEL, through interactive and case - based materials grounded in scientific insights, is designed to equip early education leaders with the core knowledge and tools to navigate the decisions, challenges, and opportunities associated with quality improvement,» said Nonie Lesaux, academic dean and Juliana W. and William Foss Thompson Professor of Education and Society at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and co-director of the Saul Zaentz Early Education Initia
early education setting
in the U.S., CEEL, through interactive and
case - based materials grounded
in scientific insights, is designed to equip
early education leaders with the core knowledge and tools to navigate the decisions, challenges, and opportunities associated with quality improvement,» said Nonie Lesaux, academic dean and Juliana W. and William Foss Thompson Professor of Education and Society at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and co-director of the Saul Zaentz Early Education Initia
early education leaders with the core knowledge and tools to navigate the
decisions, challenges, and opportunities associated with quality improvement,» said Nonie Lesaux, academic dean and Juliana W. and William Foss Thompson Professor of Education and Society at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and co-director of the Saul Zaentz
Early Education Initia
Early Education Initiative.
Our data collection resulted
in rich
case studies revealing the
decisions made by these
early career teachers to remain
in their schools, move to other schools or leave teaching and the extent to which other members of the profession played a part
in their professional growth.
They described repeated suspensions, multiple daily phone calls and frequent demands to pick their children up from school
early, which made their lives difficult and
in some
cases contributed to their
decisions to leave.
This gives them access to the largest pool of financial aid and,
in some
cases, increases odds for acceptance through
Early Decision or
Early Action options.
As per an email I received
earlier today from Bruce (i.e., Sheri's husband / attorney who prosecuted her
case), the Court otherwise «declined to make an overall ruling on the [New York growth] rating system
in general because of new regulations
in effect» [e.g., that the state's growth model is currently under review]... [Nontheless, t] he
decision should qualify as persuasive authority for other teachers challenging growth scores throughout the County [and Country].
First Mojang's victory
in the «Scrolls»
case, and now it has been revealed that the United Court of Appeals denied the right to appeal an
earlier decision that dismissed an injunction against Interplay and their Fallout MMO.
Here, btw, is a roundup of previous Cariou v. Prince posts, including readings, reviews, and info about the book I made, Canal Zone Richard Prince YES RASTA: Selected Court Documents from Cariou v. Prince, which contains the transcript from Prince's amazing 7 - hour deposition
in the
case:
Early days of THE BOOK: the five most ridiculous things about the Richard Prince copyright
decision The Richard Prince
decision?
In law there is a service that tracks court decisions and not only states if it was cited, but how it was cited, i.e. did the court completely affirm or reject what the earlier decisions said or did they differentiate what happen in the earlier case which made them only partially follow it, etc
In law there is a service that tracks court
decisions and not only states if it was cited, but how it was cited, i.e. did the court completely affirm or reject what the
earlier decisions said or did they differentiate what happen
in the earlier case which made them only partially follow it, etc
in the
earlier case which made them only partially follow it, etc..
1 Sept: FarmOnline: Lucy Knight: Peter Spencer wins his day
in High Court PROPERTY rights crusader, Peter Spencer, who went on a hunger strike on his southern NSW farm
earlier this year, has broken down outside the High Court
in Canberra following an unanimous
decision in his favour to finally have his
case heard... But the High Court today ruled that Mr Spencer has a
case to be heard, and that there was essentially no
case to stop it from being heard.
Though some it his lawyers will be able to claim back, he's still likely to lose # 60,000 of his own money as a result of his brave, principled
decision to fight the
case rather than cave
in earlier.
But the widely held expectation among those close to the
case is that oral arguments will take place
in the fall and a
decision is expected
early next year.
Similar
cases are set to go to trial
in California (as
early as Oct. 22) and Rhode Island, and the auto makers are likely to appeal the
decision.
Also following the recent mass
cases involving holiday pay claims and
in particular the
case of Bear Scotland v Fulton (which was back to the EAT
in December ’16 and the
decision is awaited) it was held that if there was a gap of 3 months or more between non-payment of holiday pay then the claim would not be allowed for being out of time (allowing for any extension of time for ACAS
early conciliation of course).
In the first there judges have unlimited discretion (Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25: «all the circumstances of the case» and a checklist (s 25 (2)-RRB-; though in practice they tend to be guided by a small number of significant earlier decision
In the first there judges have unlimited discretion (Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25: «all the circumstances of the
case» and a checklist (s 25 (2)-RRB-; though
in practice they tend to be guided by a small number of significant earlier decision
in practice they tend to be guided by a small number of significant
earlier decisions.
As the UK did
in earlier cases on this topic submitted to the Court,
in case C - 81 / 13 UK v Council it criticised the Council once more for using Article 48 TFEU as the substantive legal basis for the adoption of a social security measure implementing an association agreement,
in this particular
case the Council
Decision 2012 / 776 / EU, which aimed to update the obsolete implementing provisions on the coordination of social security systems as established by the EEC - Turkey Association Agreement (Agreement).
In the earlier Massachusetts case, the SJC emphasized that its decision in favor of applicant Ross E. Mitchell was confined to the unique circumstances of his cas
In the
earlier Massachusetts
case, the SJC emphasized that its
decision in favor of applicant Ross E. Mitchell was confined to the unique circumstances of his cas
in favor of applicant Ross E. Mitchell was confined to the unique circumstances of his
case.
The Ontario Court of Appeal
decision in December overturned a ruling six months
earlier by Ontario Superior Court Justice David Brown, who had granted Chevron a stay
in the proceedings on the basis that the
case had little hope of success and that Chevron Canada's assets were not directly owned by Chevron Corp..
Earlier statistics regarding ICC cost
decisions seem to suggest that arbitral tribunals
in most
cases start with the rule «costs follow the event» but
in the end decide that each party has to bear its own costs.
Background I outlined the Tribunal's Tabcorp
decision in an
earlier blog (Tribunal Clears Tabcorp / Tatts Merger (ACL Blog, 30 June 2017)-RRB- and provided some more detailed information and
case extracts on my my Tabcorp
case page).
These
decisions demonstrate a greater latitude to the types of statements which will be protected, particularly with regard to the breadth of their publication, than had been the
case in earlier Canadian law395.
In upholding an earlier decision, the Court of Appeal said that forcing the courts to impose at least a 12 - month jail term could, in some cases, be out of line with the various acts captured by the la
In upholding an
earlier decision, the Court of Appeal said that forcing the courts to impose at least a 12 - month jail term could,
in some cases, be out of line with the various acts captured by the la
in some
cases, be out of line with the various acts captured by the law.
Earlier this month Google made changes to Google Scholar
in order to make it easier to find significant citing
decisions that discuss a
case in greater length — potentially supporting it, overturning it, or differentiating it.
Moreover, the Court also uses extensive and systematic references to
earlier case law to put its
decision in context with the previous jurisprudence.
That
decision, resulting directly from a
case involving a bankrupt producer
earlier in the year, could have a chilling effect on M&A activity
in the region.
The updated offering includes the popular clustering and visual review capabilities of Document Mapper as well as two components, Smart
Decision and Concept Mapper, designed to assist
in early case assessments (ECA), keyword testing and the faster creation of review assignments.
Earlier this month, a Florida appellate court handed down a
decision in an interesting nursing home negligence
case, requiring the court to determine the validity of an arbitration contract signed by a deceased resident's daughter.
In both cases, the court had earlier directed a fact finding hearing, to be heard by the President in June, presumably to establish the factual basis for any decision as to the s 31 threshold criteri
In both
cases, the court had
earlier directed a fact finding hearing, to be heard by the President
in June, presumably to establish the factual basis for any decision as to the s 31 threshold criteri
in June, presumably to establish the factual basis for any
decision as to the s 31 threshold criteria.
Like the Supreme Court's
earlier decision in R. v. Tessling, these
cases raised broad and important questions about the nature of privacy and autonomy
in a world of ubiquitous information emanation.
Earlier last month, the Connecticut Court of Appeals issued a written opinion
in a Connecticut car accident
case requiring the court to discuss the distinction between a judge's
decision whether to admit certain evidence and the weight that evidence is afforded by the fact - finder once admitted.
Whilst the recent
decision focuses on some important points, i.e. that a costs order was already
in place, it follows that where parties wish to suggest that the ABTA mediation scheme should be used, such suggestions need to be made at an
early stage and certainly before the
case settles and an order for costs is made.
To cite one chill - inducing recent
case, an individual was fined $ 15,000
in early March for sending 58 emails to market his commercial flyer business (Compliance and Enforcement
Decision CRTC 2017 - 65).
The
decision of the Court of Appeal
in this
case is very much
in line with its
earlier recent
decision in Richards v London Borough of Bromley [2012] EWCA Civ 1476; [2012] All ER (D) 184 (Nov).
In a decision released earlier this month a strong panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal took a look at one aspect of the issue of what constitutes a «record,» in this case for the purposes of applying the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M. 5
In a
decision released
earlier this month a strong panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal took a look at one aspect of the issue of what constitutes a «record,»
in this case for the purposes of applying the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M. 5
in this
case for the purposes of applying the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M. 56.
In the early 80's, the Canadian Law Information Council (CLIC) noted that the «style of cause» was an important tool to locate decisions and track judicial history in law reports, and that the lack of consistency among those prepared by different publishers was therefore a significant hindrance to the reliability of legal research (see Lounder, Case law reporting in Canada, 1982 and Helleiner, Standards for headnoting: case identification, CLIC, 1984
In the
early 80's, the Canadian Law Information Council (CLIC) noted that the «style of cause» was an important tool to locate
decisions and track judicial history
in law reports, and that the lack of consistency among those prepared by different publishers was therefore a significant hindrance to the reliability of legal research (see Lounder, Case law reporting in Canada, 1982 and Helleiner, Standards for headnoting: case identification, CLIC, 1984
in law reports, and that the lack of consistency among those prepared by different publishers was therefore a significant hindrance to the reliability of legal research (see Lounder,
Case law reporting in Canada, 1982 and Helleiner, Standards for headnoting: case identification, CLIC, 19
Case law reporting
in Canada, 1982 and Helleiner, Standards for headnoting: case identification, CLIC, 1984
in Canada, 1982 and Helleiner, Standards for headnoting:
case identification, CLIC, 19
case identification, CLIC, 1984).