Sentences with phrase «earlier papers referred»

Jr., and Donald W. Sherburne, PS 3:27 - 40 (1973), and earlier papers referred to there.

Not exact matches

READ ALSO: Terkper presents Q1 budget The paper was earlier referred to the Finance Committee of Parliament and the report on the estimates was subsequently presented to the house after it had finished its work.

Yamanaka was referring to a recent string of public apologies by stem cell scientists in Japan, triggered by two high - profile papers published earlier this year that claim to have found an alternate way to reprogram adult cells into embryolike ones — called STAP (stimulus - triggered acquisition of pluripotency) cells.

The researchers analyzed migration data collected intermittently from two different periods — referred to in the paper as «early» and «late» — for two beluga populations, covering the years 1993 - 2002 and 2004 - 2012.

An earlier post refers to the «Huang» graph on page 15 of the Monkton paper.

A central goal of this paper is to argue the benefits of using the term carbohydrate intolerance to refer to the full spectrum of this common metabolic problem, from the earliest subtle impairments to end - stage diseases.

E.g., one early manuscript I found refers to meta - stable hydrates at 20m depth; the final paper was raised to 60m.

After reviewing the Levitus et al 2008 papers abstract, (as I do not have access to the paper it's self), I assumed that the data you were referring to was based on some earlier data sets which seemed to demonstrate a ever increasing distributed localized temperature swing, when subsequent data, as indicated in the Levitus et al 2008 suggests a systemic imbalance of oceanic heat content increase in the range of a 0.31 Deg.

[Response: Not sure what you are referring to that we have said, but the reason why this is noteworthy is because it underlines our comments made earlier that the PC normalisation issue that was the basis for the M&M (2005) paper is irrelevant, and that the reconstructions only diverge (and get worse) if you start removing data.

However, you are free to refer to this self - same «upcoming paper» in an earlier post, despite the fact that nobody else has seen it:

Instead, in his latest attack on Monckton's APS paper, he refers back to his earlier «cuckoo science» cited here, as if he had succeeded in «trashing» Monckton at that point.

This will complement and supplement the earlier 2003 paper setting out the static situation which Robert refers to in this article.

The paper contains all sorts of equivocations, such as «Unfortunately, no CO2 records are currently available for either of these events» — referring to the late Devonian, early Carboniferous glaciations.

That listing is the original paper that the rebuttal paper is referring to, The rebuttal paper in this case is, Early Climate Change Consensus at the National Academy: The Origins and Making of Changing Climate (PDF)(Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, Volume 40, Number 3, pp. 318 — 349, 2010)- Nicolas Nierenberg, Walter R. Tschinkel, Victoria J. Tschinkel Technically I am not counting any of those listed under this section anyway.

Hank — the 1997 Johnson paper you referred to earlier, Climate control requires a dam at the Strait of Gibraltar, was the main source I could find, where an effect on the climate was predicted.

Alan S makes a good point although he refers to K - T early paper.

The commentaries made by my peers in reference to my paper entitled, «Intimate Relationships: Personality Development Through Interaction During Early Life,» refer to the general lack of major components concerning certain aspects of my theory.

I was waylaid by a gossip item early in the paper, which gratuitously mentioned Marieke Hardy describing Mia as «execrable» — Mark was delighted by the word «execrable» and said he couldn't wait to use it over the weekend, but that wasn't the article he was referring to.