Not exact matches
Earlier this week Apple filed its initial reply in the case, citing
precedents of other companies being allowed to bundle
such proposals.
There are no
precedents in any state upholding
such an
early deadline.
Critics have, perhaps too often, related her images to the historical
precedents set by
early modernists
such as Edward Weston, Minor White, Aaron Siskind, and Alfred Stieglitz (notably his «Equivalents» series of 1925 — 34).
The work finds visual
precedent in
earlier sculptures with the same cast of characters and related configurations,
such as Train, Mechanical, Pig Island (2007), Mountain (2009) and Static (2004 - 2009).
Similarly, in previous conversations with you at your studio, you also described your paintings and your use of pattern as subjective, specifically in comparison with
earlier Op Art
precedents,
such as Bridget Riley and Richard Anuszkiewicz.
oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an
earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a
precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against
such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??
Stating that administrative decision - makers
such as the FOIP Commissioner are entitled to alter
precedents or completely depart from an
earlier interpretation of legislation — as Justice Manderscheid states here (at para 84)-- was perhaps tenable in a legal system that did not employ a strong presumption of deference to substantive legal findings made by these persons.