Not exact matches
In partnership with Child Trends, opportunities will be organized discourse with policymakers and practitioners, sharpening of implementation research skills, opportunities to author
publications, and enhancing general knowledge acquisition
regarding issues related to the
early care and education workforce.
- Brian Williams Chances are you've heard about a little
publication called the New York Times and one columnist's article
earlier this week that
regarding BlackBerry users and how most of us are ashamed of our devices and that we're the Black Sheep of the mobile world.
Just a couple quick examples: the boreholes were an
early dissenter and entered the scene around the same time as MBH; Wally Broecker published a letter in Science criticizing the MBH curve very shortly after it's
publication; divergence and curve standardization issues associated with the tree rings were widely being discussed by the late 90's and Esper et al. (2002) was an important later contribution in that
regard, the prospect of a localized or global LIA and MWP was (and is) a hot topic before MBH, and so on.
Although this was the only supporting academic
publication for the CNWT series used in D'Arrigo et al 2006, they did not directly discuss this
earlier chronology, other than in
regard to the choice of RCS or STD standardization methods, about which they stated:
These decisions demonstrate a greater latitude to the types of statements which will be protected, particularly with
regard to the breadth of their
publication, than had been the case in
earlier Canadian law395.
At the time of
publication, it's still the
early hours of the morning in the US and we haven't seen any user reports
regarding the update crop up on social media.