Not exact matches
In the
early days of the federal
War on Poverty in the 1960s, researchers provided three - and four - year - olds from impoverished Ypsilanti, Michigan, with enriched preschooling, and then compared their life trajectories over several decades with those of Ypsilanti peers who had not received any
early childhood education.
The ambitious
early - childhood program launched in 1965 as part of the
War on Poverty is going through dramatic — and sometimes painful — changes, while continuing to pursue its mission.
In the
early 1960s, before the
War on Poverty was declared, I was deeply involved in the local Chicago civil rights movement.
Another favorite
early education program, Head Start, a creator of which died
on February 2, was launched in 1965 as part of Lyndon Johnson's
War on Poverty and is another
early education initiative that enjoys great public support.
The Problem of Head Start Nowhere is resistance to structured, curriculum - based, standards - and - assessment - driven
early education clearer than in the big, iconic, federal
early - childhood program known as Head Start, a legacy of Lyndon Johnson's mid-1960s declaration of
war on poverty.
«Supplement, not supplant» is a key element of the education act, going back to the
earliest version of the law, enacted five decades ago as part of President Lyndon Johnson's
war on poverty, and the roots of controversy stretch back that far as well.
Head Start turns 50 this week, a milestone that reminds us that in many ways the
War -
on -
Poverty program pioneered the path that led to today's push for a broad and high - quality
early education system.