Professor Ellen Brantlin of Indiana University was
an early critic of standards based education reform (SBR).
Not exact matches
Later in life, Ebert became an
early adopter
of blogging and using Twitter before it became
standard platforms for
critics.
Many Democratic
critics say that while they don't oppose the idea
of national
standards, the Common Core is not based on research and that parts
of it ignore what is known about how students learn, especially in the area
of early childhood education.
But support began to wane when
critics from all sides
of the political spectrum began to emerge with concerns on a variety
of fronts, including problems with the content
of the
standards and the developmental inappropriateness
of those for the
earliest grades, the design
of the new tests, how the new exams were written and by whom, and the federal government's funding
of new standardized tests aligned to the Core.
Critics on the left have taken issue with a number
of things surrounding the
standards (you can read a post about eight problems with the Core here), saying that there was not enough input from educators into the drafting
of the Core, that the
standards are not based on any research, that they ignore what is known about
early childhood development and much more.
But
critics say that the
standard IPO process is designed to minimize volatility in the
early days
of trading.