Sentences with phrase «early word says»

This is the first novel from Foer in more than 10 years; early word says it is his most mature and thoughtful book yet.

Not exact matches

Earlier this year, Wall Street Journal editor Gerard Baker made a similar argument, saying the word lie «implies much more than just saying something that's false.
«We need a different type of action... not words,» Robinson said in an earlier interview with the AP.
But the account echoed wording in a comment made a day earlier to The Associated Press by longtime Comey friend Daniel Richman, a former federal prosecutor, who said the president had removed «somebody unwilling to pledge absolute loyalty to him.»
«Anyone who knows me knows these words don't reflect who I am,» Trump said in an apology video early Saturday morning, calling the footage a «distraction» from important issues.
Almost all the stories surrounding Jesus (if he did exist, some scholars say their is no proof of a historical Jesus) were borrowed from earlier myths and used word for word... as well as the rampant literary corruption and forgeries of Biblical Texts... It is also impossible for God to exist in the Christian version or form they created.
That is to say, might God be calling the church to a «new thing» in which not even earlier words of God — good and proper for their own time — can stand in the way of the broader community God now has in mind?
Earlier in the day, a sister reads books to her and I'll be darned if it doesn't look like this six - day - old baby is intently listening to every word she says.
In a word, he might be said to have formed the first ecclesia, the earliest church, called out from the doomed majority to be a redeeming minority.
and earlier says in Matthew 10:5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, that I, being a Gentile, the words HE spoke don't pertain to me?
The Fourth Gospel attributes to Jesus the words, «Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except one be born of water and the Spirit, he can not enter into the kingdom of God»; (John 3:5) the Epistle to Titus says the same thing in other language — «He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit»; (Titus 3:5) and in the Shepherd of Hermas, which in some of the earliest canons was included in the New Testament, the baptismal water is called «the seal of the Son of God» into which they descend «dead,» and out of which they come «alive.»
Thank you for giving me the chance to express out but still I am hurt and a nice word will cool it of and guide me if wrong and about quitting I would because what I am doing now at CNN is taking almost my whole time since the Quran burnning issue and would out doubt I will go back to it and that's why I mentioned earlier that we back here worry about our daily bread and water for family support but needed from you in the free world to notice us out there and have your say on behalf of all heavenly beliefs that what is happening is wrong, One Nation Calamities to other nations benefit, profit?!
Not hesitating, and without saying a word (not to God, 2 and probably not to Sarah), Abraham «arose early in the morning,» as if he were wholeheartedly in sympathy with the request.
In English we expect that when a sentence starts with that, it is referring to the topic of the previous sentence, but in Greek the word can have an implied «As I was saying earlier
German Protestant theology had been dominated since the early 1920s by various theologies that had stressed and interwoven the concepts of revelation as foundational to theology and of the Word of God as a concrete address calling for a radical decision of faith or unfaith, with varying emphasis on whatever the address might actually say.
Analogously, the fact that parts of sayings in Thomas can be paralleled in several gospels does not prove that the author used a source earlier than them; it may well indicate simply that he was combining gospel words.
No one questions the words that Plato wrote, no one says «I doubt Plato really said that,» yet Plato was in existance around 400BC doing his teachings, but the earliest copies of Platos writings that we have in our possesion are from 900AD... that's a 1300 year gap as opposed to the New Testaments 25 - 30 year gap... That speaks for something, I believe.
I believe that many say it is 24 hours based on the words used in the earliest manuscripts.
The earlier silence during such egregious actions / words says otherwise.
Tu fecisti nos ad te, domine, et inquietum cor nostrum donec requiescat in te — so Augustine said, in words I quoted in English earlier, I have given the Latin here because I wish to correct the usual and mistaken translation so often found, which makes Augustine say we are made «for God.»
One thing, however, we can say with reasonable certainty is that the large body of sayings which he gives in common with Luke must have conic down to both, whether in writing or by word of mouth, from a period much earlier than the date at which the two authors wrote.2 It brings us that much nearer to the fountainhead.
Detailed comparative analysis of individual sections or pericopae in the synoptic gospels has confirmed the hypothesis that during the lengthy period before the writing of our earliest gospel individual sayings and incidents in Jesus» ministry were — note the verb — used: as they were worked over and adapted, their context and wording may have been altered beyond recall.
Those the BBC report describes as «sources close to Mr Clegg» (i.e. Mr Clegg himself) said the use of the word «bigot» was «a mistake», and that the «early draft» of his speech should not have...
Individualism probably did not exist as a word (Tocqueville said in the 1830s that it was newly minted), and the word «individual» earlier meant «indivisible.»
A major part of the problem is that though Immanuel Kant wrote about dignity in the 18th century and the word was in use even earlier, strong efforts to elucidate and work with it have not been made (as have been made for, say, the notion of human rights, the subject of innumerable books, essays and court cases).
So you take what the early church fathers, the ones trying to legitimize their religion as much as possible, the ones saying that all the similarities are products of the devil, and just take their word rather than actual archaeological evidence and anthropological study?
C. H. Dodd from the angle of realized eschatology and his conviction that Jesus believed the kingdom had already come in his own person interprets them as originally spoken by Jesus to refer to the crisis connected with his own death and resurrection.9 Others who believe that Jesus could not have said these things attribute them to the early church and the error of the evangelists in presenting them as his words.
Recalling our earlier discussion of the different senses in which Hartshorne uses the word «literal,» we can infer that what he means by saying that «know» or «love» may be literal as applied to God is not that they may apply to God in the same sense in which they apply to all individuals, but, rather, that they may apply to God in the primary sense in which they are thus applicable, their application to any other individual being secondary.
I was told the story that my great grandfather used to say exactly that (slightly different word for «poop»)- way back in the early 1900s!
All this is obvious and yet it needs to be said, if only to clear the air for a consideration of the early Christian use of a word such as «eyewitness».
Apparently an early way of citing a saying of Jesus was with the words: «Remember the words of the Lord Jesus how he said...» This formula occurs in the book of Acts and traces of it are to be found in I Clement, Polycarp, and elsewhere.
On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.
Yet just a month earlier, when the October poverty statistics revealed quite clearly that the number of poor people had risen to an all - time high under Bill Clinton, the liberal columnists never said a word.
«How wonderful to be able to see him,» Gersten said earlier this week, each word laced with the kind of anticipation a soldier coming home after battle feels.
However, while in his earliest work he thinks it «probable» on balance that the Word would not have become flesh unless we had fallen [5] in the later De Veritate he says that the primacy of Christ is the end to which the whole of creation is ordered and is the principle of our predestination into the supernatural life.
As someone said earlier God gave us brains to think and to reason and also to READ and UNDERSTAND his word.
Sometimes this is explicit, in the exchange of harsh words; at other times it is implicit, evident not so much in what is said as in what is left unsaid --- for example, in the loss of those earlier notes of emotional, intellectual, and spiritual intimacy with his beloved sister Jemima.
Muslims do not accept his diety, or resurection, and since the Bible was written earlier and there are so many parts from the Bible taken and entered into the quran...?!! Since the Bible was written, and the red words are of Jesus and Jesus says «I AM», and Muslims believe Jesus was a prophet, and prophets can't lie... bottom line..
you definitely need to check your facts fool, the Nazis were brought in by the christians who said he was leading in the word of god, in fact the same morons in this country who proclaim god and country were the same idiots who brought the Nazis into power, if you look at the early Nazi posters they have the cross and flag emblazoned proudly as it was the god and flag crowd who brought them to power.
Earlier this year, I watched a video of women ages 15 to 50 saying the first thing that came to mind when they heard the word «abortion.»
For this reason, Heidegger believed, the words those earliest thinkers used, in their original meanings, were still inseparable from the event of being's self - disclosure; for a time, being really manifested itself — which is also to say, retained its impenetrable mystery — in the names that it evoked from those whom it addressed.
As far as the early Church is concerned, the saying could be a prophetic word in the context of a sacred meal anticipating the messianic banquet, at a time when the Church was concerned with the influx of the Gentiles.
In other words, while the second part of this saying, the «denying», fits smoothly into the liturgical language of the early Church, the first part, the «acknowledging», does not.
Returning to Augustine and the early Church, Steinmetz shows how the famous theory of the fourfold sense of Scripture, an approach widely used in the Middle Ages, was a way of taking seriously the words and sayings of Scripture, including implicit meanings that extend beyond the original intentions of the human authors.
lol After Chelsea trashed us last two seasons (6 - 0)... Mert came out and said» we don't like early kickoffs»... in other words, «we lost bcos it was too early and sunny» lol..
Frustration and fear are not two words that you would normally associate with a footballer doing well, but there is a good case for saying that they have been heavily connected with the way that Francis Coquelin has gone from being another failed Arsenal youngster who did not make the grade and fulfil his early promise, to one of the most important players in a Gunners side putting together some of the best performances and run of results that us fans have seen for some considerable time.
I cant see us getting anything in the way of a great striker and Id be surprosed if Wenger does anything to upset his lover Giroud I noticed an article earlier saying «Admit it Giroud has done well in Euro 2016» or words to that effect but has he really?
Golf World's Ron Sirak tweeted earlier on Sunday that the two had not said a word to each other through their first five holes.
«I deeply regret using an inappropriate word in a live interview... for which I unreservedly apologize,» O'Grady said in a statement following an earlier remark in which he played the «some of my best friends are [fill in the blank]» card.
He said himself that it could change if we get to the latter stages of the competition, but in the early rounds he's going to try to rest some of the more important players (in so many words).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z