Sentences with phrase «earner families earning»

Single parent families would receive nothing, nor would two earner families earning within the same tax bracket.

A single earner family with income of $ 60,000 should not pay a higher tax rate than a two - earner family earning $ 60,000.

«It can not be right that a two - earner family each earning # 42,000 would keep all their child benefit, but a single - earner family on # 43,000 would lose it all at a stroke.»

Not exact matches

According to the Department of Finance this is how a one - earner family, with two children under the age of six, earning $ 60,000 would benefit from last week's announcements.

I can't reply directly to PK's post above, but this is referencing the great point he made about many high earners needing to live in major metro areas to earn those high incomes, but not being from those areas, and thus not having family (or even friends) close by.

Yet, even in families where both parents work full time, half say the father is the top earner, while 22 % say the mother is and 26 % say they earn about the same amount.

Critics claim the move is unfair because it will allow a dual - income family to earn up to # 88,000 without losing the benefit while single - earners will be unfairly penalised.

«But we're also equally accepting that there's also an issue about how you do that so you make sure you don't create unintended consequences where, say, a family with one earner gets child benefit removal when there's another family with income earners who actually collectively earn more but keep the benefit.»

That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Welfare Benefits Up - rating Bill because it fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000 a year.

The idea I liked was to protect the family from any emergencies for the earning years of the primary income earner in the family.

Having a family of 4 is tough — as you said you have two earners and 4 burners (Dual - earn quad - burn!).

But in a scenario where an individual is the sole earner for a family of several kids, the sum assured is surely to differ from the one having two earning members and 2 children studying in school.

The reality is that, notwithstanding the advances made by women in the workplace over the last two or three decades, men still earn more and are typically the primary wage - earners, even in two - income families.

There, 93.7 percent of all new and existing homes sold were affordable to families earning the area's median household income of $ 71,500 — up slightly from the 93.2 percent of homes affordable to median - income earners in the third quarter.