Sentences with phrase «earnings less dividends»

Is book value growing a lot more slowly than earnings less dividends would indicate?

Not exact matches

The stocks that hedge funds have largely ignored tend to be much larger than the hotels, have less debt, grow earnings more slowly but consistently, and pay bigger dividends (an average yield of nearly 3 % for the S&P 500 constituents, compared with 2 % for the index overall).

Components include common stock, paid - in - capital (amounts invested not involving a stock purchase) and retained earnings (cumulative earnings since inception of the business less dividends paid to stockholders).

Yet even if companies were to suddenly boost dividends back to their historical norm of 52 % of earnings, and even if current earnings figures were reliable, the dividend yield on the S&P 500 would still be under 1.9 %, less than half the historical norm.

In addition, Prudential has regularly increased its dividend over the past decade, and its current yield of just over 3.4 % has been achieved despite paying out less than 20 % of its earnings as dividends.

At 44.4 %, however, less than half of the company's earnings are being returned to shareholders via a dividend, providing plenty of room for more increases going forward.

It serves customers in New Jersey and Delaware, and has increased its dividend for 42 consecutive years and still maintains a payout ratio less than two - thirds of its earnings.

High Risk — Income (H / INC) Medium to higher risk equities of companies that are structured with a focus on providing a meaningful dividend but may face less predictable earnings (or losses), more leveraged balance sheets, rapidly changing market dynamics, financial and competitive issues, higher price volatility (beta), and potential risk of principal.

How sustainable is the dividend, can Consolidated Water afford to pay it from its earnings today and in 3 years (Payout ratio less than 90 %)?

If GEICO had earned less money in 1982 but had paid an additional $ 1 million in dividends, our reported earnings would have been larger despite the poorer business results.

How sustainable is the dividend, can Pan American Silver afford to pay it from its earnings today and in 3 years (Payout ratio less than 90 %)?

How sustainable is the dividend, can Artesian Resources afford to pay it from its earnings today and in 3 years (Payout ratio less than 90 %)?

Below the 20 % ownership figure, however, only our share of dividends paid by the underlying business units is included in our accounting numbers; undistributed earnings of such less - than - 20 % - owned businesses are totally ignored.

How sustainable is the dividend, can Marvell Technology Group afford to pay it from its earnings today and in 3 years (Payout ratio less than 90 %)?

By purchasing these companies after a price decline, we find we are able to control risk in the portfolio as these investments often have less downside while offering a decent potential return.The U.S. Equity Fund seeks to invest in companies with a lower Price to Book Ratio, lower Price to Earnings Ratio and higher Dividend Yield than the S&P 500 index.

The payout ratio (dividends per share divided by earnings per share) for the last four quarters (trailing 12 months) is less than or equal to 85 % for utilities and less than or equal to 50 % for companies in other industries;

He argues dividends can signal management's confidence in the business and its earnings outlook, and there is evidence to suggest that companies with strict dividend policies are less likely to squander their profits on ill - advised acquisitions.

They are all large profitable dividend payers, which have grown their dividends in recent times and trade for less than 20 times earnings.

The criteria include: (1) adequate size with respect to revenue, (2) strong financial condition with respect to liquidity, (3) reasonable earnings growth over a decade (4) modest price - to - earnings (P / E) ratio of 15 or less, (5) economical price - to - book (P / B) ratio of 1.5 or less, (6) 20 years of consistent dividend payments to insure the likelihood of continuation, and (7) earnings stability vis - a-vis the absence of any losses over the previous decade.

The income you report can only come from employment wages, taxable scholarships and grants, Alaska Permanent Fund dividends, total interest earnings of $ 1,500 or less, and unemployment compensation.

To qualify, stocks must have a five - year positive dividend growth rate and pay 60 % or less of earnings in dividends.

Growth investors are less worried about the dividend growth, high price - to - earnings ratios and high price - to - book ratios that growth companies face because the focus is on sales growth and maintaining industry leadership.

(c) Gerber («Dividend - Growth» Vol14, No1, 2013) worked with only S&P stocks, isolating those with 10 years of dividend growth, and the safety of payments less than both operating earnings and forward earnings esDividend - Growth» Vol14, No1, 2013) worked with only S&P stocks, isolating those with 10 years of dividend growth, and the safety of payments less than both operating earnings and forward earnings esdividend growth, and the safety of payments less than both operating earnings and forward earnings estimates.

However, if the Toyota Industries» GAAP income account is adjusted to pick up Toyota Industries» share of the portfolio companies» retained earnings (i.e., earnings not distributed as dividends), then Toyota Industries Common is selling at less than 10 times earnings.

Distributions of earnings from nonqualifying dividends, interest income, other types of ordinary income, and short - term capital gains (i.e., on shares held for less than one year) will be taxed at the ordinary income tax rate applicable to the taxpayer.

The next comparison repeat the process above but this company's dividends are less than earnings.

That means $ 1.4 billion of the fund's assets are invested in these large companies, providing a very stable foundation for the investor in their consistent earnings and dividends, while smaller companies that carry much less weight in the index and are even further oversold provide potential for capital appreciation.

On the other hand, a company with consistent and very fast - growing earnings will outperform a company with less earnings growth regardless of whether it pays a dividend or not.

Net - Current - Asset Value We feel on more solid ground in discussing these cases in which the market price or the computed value based on earnings and dividends is less than the net current assets applicable to the common stock.

Below the 20 % ownership figure, however, only our share of dividends paid by the underlying business units is included in our accounting numbers; undistributed earnings of such less - than - 20 % - owned businesses are totally ignored.

If GEICO had earned less money in 1982 but had paid an additional $ 1 million in dividends, our reported earnings would have been larger despite the poorer business results.

Payout rates (dividends as a percentage of As Reported GAAP earnings) remain low, as companies payout record amounts, but payout less as a percentage of what they are making - > cash sets another record

But 10 years after retirement, retirees with less remaining real wealth than the 2000 retiree faced much better market conditions in terms of lower cyclically - adjusted price - earnings ratios, higher dividend yields, and generally higher bond yields.

I have actually focused more on dividend / earnings growth and less on current yield as I have gotten older.

High payout ratios can be riskier because there is less wiggle room to continue paying dividends if earnings unexpectedly decline.

Companies that pay a large fraction of their earnings in dividends tend to grow faster than less generous companies.

The dividend yield on the S&P 500 is 2.1 % while annual earnings growth of 5 to 6 % or a bit less seems «a reasonable likelihood.»

For example, bond income is taxed at regular earnings rates; stock gains are taxed less, at capital gains rates; and I think the taxes on dividends are lower still.

Using an alternate criterion (that the average of five years of payout ratios or the ratio of the average of five years of dividends divided by five years of earnings must be below 40 %), there were three sequences with returns less than 1 % over 5 - years: 1997, 1998 and 2000.

The growth companies tend to utilize higher percentage of their earnings and hence distribute lesser dividends to the shareholders in comparison to the value companies.

The years in which the five - year average of dividends divided by the five year average of earnings is less than 50 % and the 5 - year dividend growth rate is less than 1.0 % produced identical results.

The fund selects companies with solid earnings that can sustain higher dividends, match rises in the cost of living, and which are likely to be less volatile than the wider equity market.

This screen looks for unpopular dividend - paying companies with low price - earnings and price - to - book ratios that are exhibiting positive earnings and have a reasonable amount of long - term debt relative to net working capital (current assets less current liabilities).

An aggressive investor puts a large part of their portfolios in stocks (or ETFs) of less well - established companies often without a long history of earnings or dividends.

It's selling at less than 6 times last year's earnings (and about 7x 2013 projections) and pays a 3.8 % dividend.

It's cheap (taking the midpoint of its guidance it's on less than 5.5 x earnings), it has got a strong balance sheet (net debt / EBITDA was 0.8 x at end - 2010), it has a stable business model (it is the biggest distributor of fruit and vegetables in Europe, with a reach that enables it to supply multiples across different countries), it has a decent dividend yield (circa 4.5 %) and it is spitting out cash (free cash flow for the twelve months ended 30 June 2011 amounted to $ 29.0 m — that's nearly a quarter of the group's market cap).