Sentences with phrase «earth creationism»

I can no longer support young earth creationism in good conscience.

If you know me only through the blog or my second book (A Year of Biblical Womanhood) you will find some surprises in Faith Unraveled, like how I won the Best Christian Attitude Award at my elementary school four years in a row, how I survived the annual Judgment Day House at First Baptist Church in Dayton, how I studied to defend young earth creationism in college, how I travelled to India in search of God, how a woman named Zarmina changed my life.

I believe in Old Earth Creationism of which there are three types.

And it is ironic that Mohler, who has been a tireless advocate for young earth creationism on the basis that «the straightforward and direct reading of [Genesis] describes seven 24 - hour days,» does not seem to think that a straightforward and direct reading of Jesus» teachings regarding violence is necessary.

Im from canada and I know very well that many people here hold to young earth creationism as well..

Just 45 minutes down the road, the museum promotes the young - Earth creationism belief.

Now it is but not back then (and the people on the young earth creationism side are back then).

The Earth being younger than the radiometric age of 4.5 billion years old is based on the Young Earth Creationism religious belief.

Old - Earth Creationism typically holds to a local flood, and accepts Big Bang cosmology.

I can debate young earth creationism vs. theistic evolution without shedding a tear.

In «The Genesis Flood,» the 1961 book that in many ways help launch the Young Earth creationism movement in the United States, the authors write: «Our conclusions must unavoidably be colored by our Biblical presuppositions, and this we plainly acknowledge.»

Young - earth creationism dominated at less than a tenth of the Protestant outposts and a fifth of the nondenominational schools.

Some translations lean heavily toward young - earth creationism while others lean more toward an openness about when and how quickly the universe came into existence.

They had already determined that evolution could not be true based on their religious convictions, and so any logical or scientific inconsistencies within the young earth creationism model were dismissed with a shrug of the shoulders and a pithy statement about the mysteries of God.

And in which «camp» do you tend to fall — the young earth creationism camp, the intelligent design camp, the evolutionary creationism camp, or the where - are - the - smores - because - this - is - over-my-head camp?

Having grown up in a conservative Christian environment that taught young earth creationism exclusively, I'm still playing catch up with my basic knowledge of evolutionary theory.

Only young earth creationism contradicts evolution.

How does young - earth creationism make sense to intelligent, well - meaning people?

Young earth creationism goes something like this: Because the Bible is God's Word and is truthful in all that it affirms, the book of Genesis accurately records how God created the universe and life on earth.

Is Young Earth Creationism science?

But I want to understand Old Earth Creationism and Christian Evolution.

My parents never really pushed young earth creationism on me nor taught that it was a fundamental element of the Christian faith, but for most of my life I travelled in circles where it was assumed that good Christians embraced a literal interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2, which describes the earth as being created in six days.

Are you the same John P. Tarver that posts young - earth creationism in the CNN Light Years blog?

We aren't talking about scientists that believe in god, we are talking about young earth creationism, which does not have any validity in science whatsoever.

Young earth creationism is ludicrous and young earth creationists, most of whom live in the United States and are fundamentalist Christians, are the laughing stock of the thinking world.

@Topher It seems that before Ken Ham started his own project over there at AIG, he worked for the Insti / tute for Creation Research, which basically does the same thing as the Discovery Insti / tute — namely, try to create a «sciencey» veneer for Young Earth Creationism.

Collins «subsequently rejects Young Earth creationism and intelligent design.

For young earth creationism to be true it requires all of that phenomena to have changed its rate of formation at the same exact time, for no explainable reason at all.

Evolution merely disproves Biblical Inerrancy and Young Earth Creationism.

Ham utterly failed to establish his contention, that Creationism, in particular Young Earth Creationism, is a viable model.

This is absolutely not the case concerning young earth creationism.

They are the things not directly related to our salvation (and, no, literal young earth Creationism and the flood account do not affect our salvation).

Philo of Alexandria — though not a theologian but a first century Jewish philosopher — also did not hold to young - earth Creationism.

It does not help your cause when a biology student comes into your office to ask how young earth creationism can possibly explain the fossil record and your response to her is, «Who are you sleeping with?»

Once the cheerleader for young earth creationism, I grew fascinated with the science behind evolutionary theory.

The second option that he dispels is «creationism,» or, more precisely, «young - earth creationism,» that is, a literal reading of Genesis which sees all of the material universe coming into being, complete, in six days of twenty - four hours» duration.

He mounts an impassioned appeal to advocates of young - earth creationism, urging them to see that abandoning an ultra-literal reading of Genesis and embracing the body of scientific evidence in favour of cosmological and biological evolution need not threatenin any degree their faith in the Creator.

For many, «creationism» is synonymous with Young - Earth Creationism, the view that the Genesis narratives are to be taken literally.

Since I've been asked: I'm with Nye in that I don't believe young earth creationism is a viable model of origins in today's modern scientific era.

The appendix includes an incredibly helpful guide for talking about faith shifts with friends and family and even provides suggestions for «how to be a good friend to someone in a faith shift» that you may want to photocopy and mail to that aunt who has been sending you Christian apologetics books every week since she found out you were questioning young earth creationism.

Responding to a piece I wrote for the Washington Post about my journey from young earth creationism to evolutionary creationism, Mohler told readers that my «glib and superficial endorsement of evolution and its reconciliation with Christianity is all too common and all to irresponsible.»

Oh my — Young Earth Creationism, Vic?

In this way, young earth creationism is demonstrably incorrect as a theory.

At most he is arguing against Creationism and more specifically, Young Earth Creationism, which is a pseudo-science supposedly based on Genesis.