I can no longer support young
earth creationism in good conscience.
Not exact matches
Because of a court case
in Louisiana that expressly forbid Biblical
Creationism being taught
in school science classes, the wording changed and the authors removed references to catastrophism, a world - wide flood, a recent inception of the
earth or life, the concept of kinds, or any concepts from Genesis.
Young
earth creationism is ludicrous and young
earth creationists, most of whom live
in the United States and are fundamentalist Christians, are the laughing stock of the thinking world.
Ham utterly failed to establish his contention, that
Creationism,
in particular Young
Earth Creationism, is a viable model.
In the dark ages you're religion suppressed science.When Copernicus said that The
earth revolved around the sun you ridculed him.Also, you push the wrong theory of
creationism.
Since I've been asked: I'm with Nye
in that I don't believe young
earth creationism is a viable model of origins
in today's modern scientific era.
Science has disproven that the world was created 6000 years ago
in your Christian world, has disproven the church's theory that the sun rotated around the
earth, that the
earth is flat, that
creationism is responsible for the diversity of species.
Creationism means believing
in Adam and Eve and
in turn believing
in incest because the
earth could not have been populated otherwise.
In «The Genesis Flood,» the 1961 book that in many ways help launch the Young Earth creationism movement in the United States, the authors write: «Our conclusions must unavoidably be colored by our Biblical presuppositions, and this we plainly acknowledge.&raqu
In «The Genesis Flood,» the 1961 book that
in many ways help launch the Young Earth creationism movement in the United States, the authors write: «Our conclusions must unavoidably be colored by our Biblical presuppositions, and this we plainly acknowledge.&raqu
in many ways help launch the Young
Earth creationism movement
in the United States, the authors write: «Our conclusions must unavoidably be colored by our Biblical presuppositions, and this we plainly acknowledge.&raqu
in the United States, the authors write: «Our conclusions must unavoidably be colored by our Biblical presuppositions, and this we plainly acknowledge.»
In this way, young
earth creationism is demonstrably incorrect as a theory.
Creationism means believing
in a literal 6 day creation, believing that the words
in the Bible were written
in English and the term day was used (it wasn't but that's another argument), and a young 6000 — 10000 year old
Earth.
Love how you skew your argument away from
creationism towards flat
earth and geo - centrism then slam those fallacies instead of dealing with the gaps
in the fossil record.
E.g.,
in regards to scientific support for evolution and rejection of
creationism and the young
earth dogma,
in 1986, 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, signed an amicus curiae brief asking the US Supreme Court
in Edwards v. Aguillard to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the teaching of
creationism, which the brief described as embodying religious dogma.
Creationism is the idea that the
earth is only about 6000 - 10000 years old and that man was created
in the exact image that they are
in today.
At first glance, Intelligent Design seems to offer hope: While eschewing the Young
Earth theory of
creationism, it acknowledges the need, deeply embedded
in scientists and theologians alike, to recognize final cause, or telos,
in the created universe.
Wait a minute, conservatives are trying to put
creationism and young
earth biblical BS
in school science class.
At the time, the majority of the science faculty espoused young
earth creationism, so I learned about evolution
in the context of Christian apologetics courses, with the presupposition that evolution was incompatible with the Christian faith.
According to this chart, the Christian worldview includes belief
in young
earth creationism, support for the death penalty, a commitment to mind / body dualism, rejection of non-traditional family structure, and devotion to fee enterprise and capitalism.
2) I fear that if Christian institutions continue to teach young
earth creationism, they will render themselves irrelevant
in the marketplace of ideas.
And
in which «camp» do you tend to fall — the young
earth creationism camp, the intelligent design camp, the evolutionary
creationism camp, or the where - are - the - smores - because - this - is - over-my-head camp?
@Ken, Bill Nye is, I think, talking about Young
Earth Creationism, which is a belief
in a strict literal interpretation of Genesis, which is inconsistent with the evidence we have available.
For many of us, fighting the good fight of faith meant proving to skeptics that young
earth creationism was scientifically sound, that the Battle of Jericho was an historical fact, and that believing
in God was a perfectly rational and reasonable thing to do.
Having grown up
in a conservative Christian environment that taught young
earth creationism exclusively, I'm still playing catch up with my basic knowledge of evolutionary theory.
Of course there are many Religious Right advocates that do not accept historic or scientific facts and believe
in Creationism over proven Evolution, believe the
earth is 5000 years old instead of Billions reguardless of the fossil and rock record.
The museum presents the case for Young
Earth creationism, following what it says is a literal interpretation of the book of Genesis, which says the
Earth was created by God
in six days less than 10,000 years ago.
Washington (CNN)-- Florida Sen. Marco Rubio attempted to walk the line between science and faith - based
creationism in remarks that that have provoked the ire of liberal blogs, leaving the door open to
creationism in responding to a recent question about the age of the
Earth.
TheTraveler:
Creationism has no place in a science class because there is no scientific evidence to support it, and there is strong scientific evidence against «young earth» c
Creationism has no place
in a science class because there is no scientific evidence to support it, and there is strong scientific evidence against «young
earth»
creationismcreationism.
I'd been convinced that young
earth creationism (absent of any evolution at all) was a fundamental tenant of the Christian faith and the only truly biblical position... so rather than simply questioning my approach to science, I questioned my entire faith
in God.
It took place
in an atmosphere of respectful listening and learning, consciously seeking a via media between the more - publicised extreme schools of «anti-Darwinian» biblical fundamentalism (young -
earth creationism) and «ultra-Darwinian» atheism (scientism).
My parents never really pushed young
earth creationism on me nor taught that it was a fundamental element of the Christian faith, but for most of my life I travelled
in circles where it was assumed that good Christians embraced a literal interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2, which describes the
earth as being created
in six days.
While reading The Language of God, I experienced a strange phenomenon: I simultaneously grew more convinced that my faith
in God was
in fact reasonable while also growing more convinced that my belief
in young
earth creationism was not.
«The secretary of state acknowledges that clauses 2.43 and 2.44 of the Funding Agreement, and clauses 23E and 23G above do not prevent discussion of beliefs about the origins of the
Earth and living things, such as
creationism,
in Religious Education, as long as it is not presented as a valid alternative to established scientific theory.»
A crushing defeat at the hands of their «inferiors» required the kind of convoluted explanations one sees
in trying to defend the ptolemaic model or young
Earth creationism.
Most people
in Darwin's time still adhered to
creationism, the idea that a divine being was responsible for the diversity of life we find on
Earth.
Dating is a stage of romantic relationships
in humans whereby two people meet socially with the aim of each assessing the other's suitability as a G. Brent Dalrymple's classic debunking of the young -
earth «scientific»
creationism's dating methods with a short explanation of how geologists know the age
Earth sciences - Radiometric dating: In 1905, shortly after the discovery of radioactivity, the American chemist Bertram Boltwood suggested that lead is G. Brent Dalrymple's classic debunking of the young - earth «scientific» creationism's dating methods with a short explanation of how geologists know th
Earth sciences - Radiometric dating:
In 1905, shortly after the discovery of radioactivity, the American chemist Bertram Boltwood suggested that lead is G. Brent Dalrymple's classic debunking of the young -
earth «scientific» creationism's dating methods with a short explanation of how geologists know th
earth «scientific»
creationism's dating methods with a short explanation of how geologists know the age
G. Brent Dalrymple's classic debunking of the young -
earth «scientific»
creationism's dating methods with a short explanation of how geologists know the age Dating is a stage of romantic relationships
in humans whereby two people meet socially with the aim of each assessing the other's suitability as a
A recent Politico story found that taxpayers
in 14 states are spending almost a billion dollars this year
in tuition at private academies and religious schools, many of which teach fundamentalist religious doctrines like
creationism in place of science, telling students that the
earth is less than 10,000 years old and that humans co-existed with dinosaurs.
In addition to the lawsuits, the program was criticized for letting students attend religious schools that teach Young
Earth Creationism — the belief that the universe is no older than 10,000 years.
Indeed, every single «original» idea from this guy's mouth has turned out to be as accurate as the likes of Young
Earth Creationism (aka not
in the slightest) and his chances of getting things right seems to be about as «good» as the daily horoscope, TV psychics and Micheal Pachter's predictions (aka non existent).