Sentences with phrase «earth creationist»

A selection of statements on this blog by young earth creationists in just the last few days: Nope..

Most other scientists (whether Old Earth Creationists or Evolutionists) believe that the Grand Canyon was slowly formed over millions of years through water erosion.

Gallup and Pew polls from the past couple years both show that 40 % of the public are YEC's — Young Earth Creationists who think the earth and universe are less than 10,000 years old and that humans co-existed with dinosaurs.

Like me, Dan grew up defending a young earth creationist view of origins based on the conviction that the Bible spoke definitively on the issue.

Young Earth creationists use this construct and biblical genealogies to determine the age of the Earth, and typically come up with 6,000 to 10,000 years.

It's amazing that we seem to be going backwards in this regard, which, ironically, is largely the fault of the broken education system that has set such a low standard for teachers that it is common place to see a young earth creationist teaching biology classes.

It seems that some Christian scientists have no problem selling young - earth creationists what they want to hear...

One of our favorite stories of the year finally solves a lingering debate that has pitted rock art researchers and archaeologists against young - Earth creationists for decades.

in which a young earth creationist argues that «Reasonable evidence exists from the Scripture that heat did indeed flow before the Curse, which would imply a change in entropy.»

Young earth creationists seem unbothered by abandoning other elements of biblical cosmology — like a stationary earth (Ps.

This is the young earth creationist schtick.

As I've said many times before, I'm not particularly interested in converting young earth creationists into evolutionary creationists.I believe that Christians should be able to fellowship together in love and unity regardless of their various positions on the interpretation of Genesis Being neither an Old Testament scholar nor a scientist, I'll leave that debate up to the experts.

Answers in genisis is a young earth creationist website full of bs.

Here in the UK we have vocal atheists ridiculing Christian beliefs; but the beliefs they choose to ridicule are always the more extreme fundamentalist, 6 - day young earth creationist types.

Young Earth Creationists say the weeklong account of God creating the earth and everything in it represents six 24 - hour periods (plus one day of rest) and date the age of the earth between 6,000 and 10,000 years.

The Young Earth Creationist stance on cosmology has no legs to stand on.

What peer - review boards covered up this young earth creationist evidence?

It's a little hard to imagine that very many of those young earth creationists voted for Obama... so I'd say we have conclusive proof (as though any more was needed) that ignorance and voting Republican go hand in hand.

We all know that Washington and Jefferson were young earth creationist Southern Baptists born again in the glory of the Lord.

As you may know from my One Verse Podcast in which I am currently working through Genesis 3, and my literal understanding of Genesis 1 - 3 ends up being quite different than the way Young Earth Creationists understanding these opening chapters of the Bible.

AiG is the popular young - Earth creationist apologetics organization led by Ken Ham, well - known for the 2014 Bill Nye - Ken Ham debate.

In the same way, young Earth creationists start with certain assumptions (beliefs), then find the facts they believe uphold their theory of thousands of years.

As young earth creationists often do, he points to «gaps in the fossil record» as a flaw in evolutionary biology.

Mohler seems to agree with my premise (that both atheists and young earth creationists present faith and evolutionary theory as incompatible), but not my conclusions (that perpetuating this dichotomy is harmful to the future of the church).

So, you must be familiar with other exegetical work than that which young earth creationists point to then, why do you reject that?

If people with intentions unrelated to science would like to attend a scientific conference then they should be allowed, as should new - Earth creationists at American Geological Society conferences (8 October, p 30).

In any case, I wouldn't care to see a young earth creationist preacher «debate» an evolutionary biologist who was being patient enough and kind enough to offer free lectures to anyone who cared to listen.

That's why deniers will continue to insist that observed climate changes are «natural» and «cyclical,» and why young Earth creationists Tony Perkins and Ken Ham attribute them to an act of God.

Following up on his impressive rebuke of evolution / science during last night's debate with Bill Nye, young - Earth creationist Ken Ham appeared on CNN to explain how global warming is also a lie, and that climate change, as we're observing it, can all be explained by original sin.

The young earth creationists even have a peer reviewed journal, with lots of sciency papers and mathematics.

I like reading texts from BioLogos and Old Earth Creationist.

I'd been raised with the young earth creationist view and was familiar with the arguments from that camp, but what little evidence I'd studied from «the other side» struck me as compelling and sound.