This led to the widely accepted conclusion that it can not be proposed as a reliable
earthquake precursor.
Unfortunately, no one has yet found a bona fide
earthquake precursor.
Not exact matches
These and other recent
earthquakes could be
precursors to a much larger, more damaging event, according to some scientists.
By the time the 2004 magnitude - 6.0 Parkfield
earthquake — the most closely monitored quake of all time — struck the central San Andreas fault without so much as a hint of a
precursor (Science, 8 October 2004, p. 206), most researchers had abandoned attempts at precise prediction.
But the CWU team points out that many slow temblors may take place in the 500 or so years between great quakes; this makes it unlikely that any single slow
earthquake is going to be a meaningful
precursor.
And Ian Main, a University of Edinburgh seismologist who chaired an influential online debate a decade ago on whether
earthquakes can be predicted, says that radon has been considered a «marginal [quake]
precursor.
To my knowledge, neither radon nor any other kind of observation [other than foreshocks] has been shown to be a reliable
precursor of
earthquakes.
The United States Geological Survey said that
precursors to volcanic eruptions include rapid ground deformation and strong
earthquake swarms, which typically occur days to weeks before the actual eruption.