I don't even want to
eat big quantities.
However, denying yourself your favorite food for months can suck, especially in terms of motivation, so it's best to have one cheat meal every week, where you can
eat big quantities of whatever you want.
Therefore, you can
eat bigger quantities of low - energy - density foods without having to worry about the calories, which is the absolute best way to lose weight without starving yourself.
Not exact matches
Both my kids
ate huge
quantities of food at that age, on top of nursing 8 times a day (and I had a
big oversupply).
I err on the side of more smaller bottles as opposed to fewer
bigger bottles because
eating in smaller
quantities is better for us anyway.
So
eating a low - GI food causes a slow, mild rise, while the same
quantity of carbohydrate in a high - GI food will trigger a faster,
bigger rise.
Nutrient - dense
eating, or as I like to call it, «the
biggest bang for your calorie buck,» compares the
quantity and quality of nutrients with the number of calories in an item.
I suspected as much, though getting 30g of inulin from onions or garlic might require
eating, um, «antisocial»
quantities of them even if one likes them, while very frequent artichokes and asparagus would get expensive and tiresome, so the convenience of RS and especially potato starch in order to ensure sufficient prebiotic is a
big selling point to me.
I'm a
big believer in the French sensibility that you can have your cake and
eat it too, as long as there is quality and
quantity control.