Thus, the court reversed the rulings on the tortious interference with prospective
economic advantage allegations and sent the case back to the trial court to resolve these issues of fact.
The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine affirmed the ruling of the trial court in the property line dispute, but reversed the ruling on the tortious interference with
economic advantage allegations and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.
The court considered whether an association's rules could constitute a «determinable legal standard» to support intentional interference with
economic advantage allegations.
Not exact matches
Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger was able to establish to the Crown that the complainant fabricated the
allegations because P.O. had filed for divorce and for her to gain an
economic advantage in the divorce.
Because oral contracts for real estate are unenforceable, the only
allegation on appeal was the tortious interference with
economic advantage action.