Sentences with phrase «economic and social development outcomes»

The change of focus from consideration of the legal framework of native title to consideration of the economic and social development outcomes that may be generated through the native title system is a natural progression in our work for reasons other than political utility.

While there are many examples of native title agreements that do provide economic and social development outcomes for traditional owner groups these are not usually a result of applying native title policy goals, but rather come out of the intersection of native title with the States» other policy priorities.

Agreement - making processes also provide Indigenous peoples with an opportunity to obtain economic and social development outcomes.

While previous reports have made it clear that the NTA needs to provide a just and equitable framework for returning land to Indigenous people, we also need to explore other opportunities to expand the economic and social development outcomes for Indigenous people produced by the native title system.

In focusing on the economic and social development outcomes of thirty years of land rights, critical thought should be directed at the adequacy of the mechanisms set up to achieve these aims.

Principle 5 above also prioritises «integration» in order to direct the native title system towards economic and social development outcomes.

Communal ownership and decision - making are seen to be inhibitors of economic and social development outcomes.

The consultations highlighted critical issues for agreement making directed to economic and social development outcomes, including the need for: effective community decision making structures and community engagement with the process; adequate time and resources for capacity development; creative ideas for sustainable economic development; support for outcomes beyond the legal framework; positive relationships; and underlying infrastructure such as health, roads and education to be guaranteed by governments.

State governments must be commended for funding negotiations and other initiatives that increase the potential for beneficial economic and social development outcomes for traditional owner groups.

The principles presented in this Report for promoting economic and social development through native title, seek to integrate the structures and values that are important to Indigenous peoples with the processes that will maximize the economic and social development outcomes for traditional owner groups.

The important role of self - determination in achieving economic and social development outcomes is also recognized in the Declaration on the Right to Development and is demonstrated by the experience of North American Indian groups.

Before going specifically to the principles it is important to note that the overarching goal of the principles - the economic and social development of the traditional owner group, is consistent with the goals of the broader Indigenous policy which posits a range of economic and social development outcomes as urgent priorities.

Indeed, the experience of North American Indian communities reinvigorates the purpose of communal ownership and decision - making and re-recognises the importance of self - determination, particularly in those communities seeking to achieve improved economic and social development outcomes.

Not exact matches

During the development of the Basin Plan, Basin water ministers requested an adjustment mechanism be included to allow for better social, economic and environmental outcomes than would otherwise have been achieved.

Stakeholders» input was integrated into development of A Healthy Start for Minnesota Children: Supporting Opportunities for Life - Long Health, a theory of change that depicts how public understanding, health in all policies, and community innovation lead to 1) safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments and 2) social and economic security, which in turn will help the state achieve its ultimate outcome — that every Minnesota child, prenatal to age three years, will thrive in their family and community and achieve their full potential regardless of their race, where they live, or their family's income.

This revolution in new knowledge about the developing brain and human genome, linked to advances in the behavioral and social sciences, offers new opportunities for more effective strategies to improve outcomes in education, economic development, health, and social welfare.

Yet research from James Heckman, the Nobel Memorial Prize winner in economics, demonstrates the positive impact of early childhood development on health, as well as on economic and social outcomes.

This report draws from a scholarly discussion paper The National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER) produced for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) that presented the pros and cons of various instruments used for reporting on international data of children's cognitive and social outcomes.

Over the last several decades, sustainable human development has been conceived largely as the outcome of balanced work on three «pillars» — economic and social development and environmental protection.

This analytical report addresses the social dimensions of climate change from a sustainable, equitable development perspective, understood as «an irreducible holistic concept where economic, social and environmental issues are interdependent dimensions that must be approached within a unifi ed framework», and where the overarching outcome is to fully promote human welfare and equal access to life - sustaining resources.

Professor Heckman has proven that investing in the early childhood development of disadvantaged children will produce great returns to individuals and society in better education, health, economic and social outcomes — not only saving taxpayers money but increasing our nation's economic productivity.

Research is also revealing that good governance is an important contributing factor in generating sustained economic development and social outcomes in Indigenous communities in Australia.

To ensure positive and sustainable outcomes, the Commonwealth should use this opportunity to develop policies for Indigenous economic and social development in partnership and cooperation with Indigenous communities.

Progressing both connection reports and traditional owner goals for economic and social development simultaneously may bring parties to a negotiated outcome with both the traditional owner group and their goals clearly identified.

In comparing the birth cohorts from 1958 and 1970 we investigate whether differences in the relationship between indicators of childhood disadvantage and development and adult health outcomes for these two cohorts are evidential, given the changes in health policy and provision and in social, demographic and economic conditions in Britain over the life course of these two birth cohorts.

not be limited to native title outcomes, but instead provide the opportunity for NTRBs to assist in addressing social and economic development of traditional owner groups;

The consultations revealed that for native title to be oriented to achieve social and economic development outcomes, the principles should apply not just to agreements but also to other aspects of the native title system.

Economic and social outcomes from agreements may be structured to benefit individuals or groups, and to suit the social, cultural and economic development goals ofEconomic and social outcomes from agreements may be structured to benefit individuals or groups, and to suit the social, cultural and economic development goals ofeconomic development goals of groups.

The Ministerial Taskforce Charter outlines the government's long term agenda for Indigenous policy while at the same time focusing on the strategies to be put in place urgently to improve outcomes.23 As the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, stated «every dollar spent on Indigenous projects and services must contribute to improved outcomes».24 The Ministerial Taskforce Charter stresses the urgency of improving social and economic well being for Indigenous Australians focusing on housing, health, education, employment, family violence, increasing economic development, improving community safety, and law and justice.

As noted above, developments in the UN and human rights system have been directed towards achieving improved economic and social outcomes.

The development of Indigenous policy based on these concepts provides an opportunity to take a fresh look at the way in which native title policy could be reconstructed, consistent with the goals and processes underlying the government's Indigenous policy, in order to provide better economic and social outcomes for Indigenous peoples.

First, is whether the NIC Principles pay sufficient regard to the full range of social, economic, cultural and political factors that impact on development outcomes in Indigenous communities.

This research highlights two important areas: the need to incorporate social, cultural, political issues within economic development strategies for Indigenous communities and; the opportunity to develop models of development that do not focus on traditional economic outcomes but can also focus on social and cultural development outcomes.

Second, this recognition produces important practical outcomes through improved social and economic development outcomes in communities.

Structuring agreements for group and / or individual outcomes and matching these outcomes to traditional owners» cultures and values highlight the need for economic and social development models to be responsive to the social, cultural and economic context of the group and to be based on the group's goals for economic and social development.

This research recognises that policies focused on economic development outcomes for Indigenous communities that have not given attention to social and cultural issues have often been unsuccessful.

This view accounts for the scant policy development of native title in NSW and its isolation from the state's wider policies aimed at achieving social and economic development outcomes for Indigenous people.

Whatever the type of outcomes sought or model for economic development chosen, these should be set by the traditional owners and reflect their goals for economic and social development, consistent with their traditional culture and values.

(67) These principles lay a basis for development that weaves environmental considerations, economic outcomes and social justice into an holistic development model.

Stakeholders» input was integrated into development of A Healthy Start for Minnesota Children: Supporting Opportunities for Life - Long Health, a theory of change that depicts how public understanding, health in all policies, and community innovation lead to 1) safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments and 2) social and economic security, which in turn will help the state achieve its ultimate outcome — that every Minnesota child, prenatal to age three years, will thrive in their family and community and achieve their full potential regardless of their race, where they live, or their family's income.

Here are outline eight guiding principles for effective investments in early childhood development that promote positive social and economic outcomes by building a «scaffolding of support» around disadvantaged young children and their families.

Linking economic development outcomes to social, ecological, political and cultural factors supports an approach which integrates the distinct identity of Indigenous people and their unique relationship to land into the development process.

These principles weave environmental considerations, economic outcomes and social justice into a holistic development model.

pay sufficient regard to the full range of social, economic, cultural and political factors that impact on development outcomes in Indigenous communities;

respond to the long term strategic plans of NTRBs and claimant groups; not be limited to native title outcomes, but instead provide the opportunity for NTRBs to assist in addressing social and economic development of traditional owner groups;

While the native title system is able to deliver social and cultural outcomes through determinations of native title, Indigenous land use agreements (ILUAs) are one of the only ways in which native title holders can pursue economic development.