As a committed Labour supporter who has been immersed in the political and
economic arguments over Britain's place in the European integration project for some forty years — from my role in overseeing JML expand its business beyond Britain to acting as Secretary of Labour Euro - Safeguards Campaign since 1975 — my views have evolved as the European Union has radically changed form.
Not exact matches
The latest
economic impacts of the pipeline constraints come amid an intensifying spat between Alberta and British Columbia
over the construction of the Trans Mountain project, pitting
arguments of
economic impact against the importance of protecting coastlines and limiting greenhouse gas emissions.
«The
economic arguments will not be the prevailing ones in the debate
over Catalonia's independence,» Cuenca said.
What about the
argument that the equity - risk premium (the premium that investors demand
over risk - free assets such as government bonds) has fallen close to zero because of greater
economic stability?
However, in Theo dore Forstmann's article it seems that several important issues are glossed
over, specifically when it comes to the historical and
economic arguments.
Capitalism, from this first
argument against
economic growth, is like a bicycle, the economy either grows (moves forward) or it falls
over.
None of these
arguments seem to demonstrate convincingly that Brexit would allow Britain to gain greater control
over its
economic future.
The figures do little to settle the
argument over the government's
economic agenda.
Arguments about the
economic importance of shooting, and the use of shooting for pest control as well as sport or hunting, are stirring memories of the bitter struggle
over fox - hunting of a decade ago.
The
economic argument is not a climate science issue, it is a resulting issue, a policy issue, combined with a slew of other issues such as peak oil and industry gone wild that long term has negative return on investment written all
over it, due to short term thinking inconsiderate of the ramifications of egregious exploitation of the earths resources for the benefit of a few at the cost of many.
Yes, we may well be inducing climate change, but there may be — in fact, there is — a moral
argument that places industrial and
economic development
over mitigation, in spite of its effect on the environment.
«Subsidy reform can lead to a more efficient allocation of resources, which will help spur higher
economic growth
over the longer term,» the IMF says — a strong
argument in the ongoing climate of
economic uncertainty that surrounds us.