«Obviously, a child considered poor in the United States may be regarded as relatively wealthy in another country,» he wrote, «but the fact that the perceived problem of socio -
economic disadvantage among students is so much greater in the United States — and in France too — than the actual backgrounds of students also suggests that what school principals in some countries consider to be social disadvantage would not be considered such in others.»
Not exact matches
«It's the capacity of those systems to invest in those students from
disadvantaged backgrounds» says Schleicher, the education director for the Organization for
Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), which administers the triennial Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
among its roughly three dozen member countries.
That is, the greater the misperception of poverty, the more likely it is for 15 - year - old students» math scores to be predicted by their actual socio -
economic status, and the harder it is for
disadvantaged students at the bottom of the socio -
economic ladder to score
among the top students.
IntoUniversity: a charity aiming to develop the skills required to go to university
among those
disadvantaged by their
economic, social, linguistic or cultural background.
In 2010, more than 1 in 5 children were reported to be living in poverty.6, 10
Economic disadvantage is
among the most potent risks for behavioral and emotional problems due to increased exposure to environmental, familial, and psychosocial risks.11 — 13 In families in which parents are in military service, parental deployment and return has been determined to be a risk factor for behavioral and emotional problems in children.14 Data from the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health demonstrated a strong linear relationship between increasing number of psychosocial risks and many poor health outcomes, including social - emotional health.15 The Adverse Childhood Experience Study surveyed 17000 adults about early traumatic and stressful experiences.
All of these outcomes are linked by the theme that they are more frequent
among children and young people who have been exposed to adverse childhood and environments characterized by multiple social, educational,
economic, and related
disadvantages.1 — 3
Various factors appear to compromise the development of supportive father - child relations
among couple families, including a high level of family socio -
economic disadvantage, adverse family events, an unsupportive partner relationship, a more disruptive or less cohesive family climate, and the presence of a non biological father figure rather than the biological father.
Especially
among families with high levels of socio -
economic disadvantage or family adversity, children's relations with both parents might benefit from greater family access to professional parenting support.
Other research indicates a negative association between adverse life events and children's socio - emotional wellbeing, independent of family socio -
economic disadvantage,
among young children and older age groups (Flouri & Kallis, 2011; Flouri, Mavroveli & Tzavidis, 2010).
Parenting is a proximal variable in the causal pathway to adverse outcomes in childhood and adolescence, of which material
disadvantage and
economic hardship are distal variables.32 Behavioural problems and temper tantrums among young children have been shown to increase as a result of parenting changes associated with economic hardship.33 Economic deprivation has also been associated with decreased respect for the father and increased dependence on peer group for adolescent boys, and lowered feelings of self adequacy and reduced goal aspirations for adolescent girls.15 Economic hardship appears to have direct and indirect effects on adolescent func
economic hardship are distal variables.32 Behavioural problems and temper tantrums
among young children have been shown to increase as a result of parenting changes associated with
economic hardship.33 Economic deprivation has also been associated with decreased respect for the father and increased dependence on peer group for adolescent boys, and lowered feelings of self adequacy and reduced goal aspirations for adolescent girls.15 Economic hardship appears to have direct and indirect effects on adolescent func
economic hardship.33
Economic deprivation has also been associated with decreased respect for the father and increased dependence on peer group for adolescent boys, and lowered feelings of self adequacy and reduced goal aspirations for adolescent girls.15 Economic hardship appears to have direct and indirect effects on adolescent func
Economic deprivation has also been associated with decreased respect for the father and increased dependence on peer group for adolescent boys, and lowered feelings of self adequacy and reduced goal aspirations for adolescent girls.15
Economic hardship appears to have direct and indirect effects on adolescent func
Economic hardship appears to have direct and indirect effects on adolescent functioning.