For instance, although the research takes into account relative
economic inequalities within the society, it does not consider absolute wealth.
Certainly, there are flaws with this system — chief among them is the fact that there are many social and
economic inequalities within and among our communities.
Not exact matches
Furthermore, recent
economic research has shown that the main driver of overall
economic inequality isn't pay
inequality within firms, but between them.
A Ted Talk by British researcher Richard Wilkinson, for example, focuses on the harm to society that results from
economic inequality — notably the gaps
within (not between) societies, which includes life expectancy, literacy, infant mortality, crime, teenage births, obesity and mental illness.
They go on to argue that we should adopt «policies that encourage firms and workers to broaden capital ownership and access to capital income, consistent
within the long American tradition of encouraging broad - based private property ownership, should be part of any effort to address today's
economic inequality.»
Gandhi saw clearly how organizing human societies around endless
economic growth would promote
inequality and conflict
within as well as between nations.
Researchers at universities in Freiburg, Kiel and Berlin have discovered that the
economic value of nature for a society is determined by, among other things, income
inequality within the society.
Social
inequality refers to disparities in the distribution of
economic assets and income as well as between the overall quality and luxury of each person's existence
within a society, while
economic inequality is caused by the unequal accumulation of wealth; social
inequality exists because the lack of wealth in certain areas prohibits these people from obtaining the same housing, health care, etc. as the wealthy, in societies where access to these social goods depends on wealth.
Your editorial points out that
inequality has been growing
within countries belonging to the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development...
«However, these human impacts can only truly be understood
within the context of
economic inequality,» pointed out political scientist and co-author Jorge Rivas of the Institute for Global Environment and Society.
The Wealth Divide — deep consideration of current realities of poverty and
economic inequality, both
within the US and worldwide; focus on Africa; Enclosures; the «resource curse» and the corruption of economics; the «law of rent»; jubilee justice laws of Abrahamic faith traditions; addressing the land problem; cooperatives.
This data reveals that a country's
economic growth is not sign of progress towards equality of population since the monetary development continues to accumulate in a few hands and thus keeping the situations of
inequality and poverty
within the borders of the countries.
However, it is not clear whether
inequality within women and men by socio -
economic level has increased or not.
The legislation recognizes that achieving excellence in American education depends on providing access to opportunity for all children, and that increasing
inequality within external social,
economic, health and community factors — traditionally viewed as outside of the domain of schools — have a significant influence on academic outcomes and a persistent achievement gap.
What's different today is not just the heightened
economic inequality we see
within the US, but also the widespread de rigueur expectation — reinforced by curators, academics, and, indeed, critics — that serious artists offer a kind of protest, working to subvert the very social and
economic power structures their patrons uphold.
Inescapable factors that occur
within these connections include overlapping extremes such as the combination of underdevelopment and overdevelopment
within one
economic system and the ever - present
inequality between marginalised and well - off communities.
In addition,
inequality within countries has increased as the benefits of rapid development have not yet spread to all corners of China and, in rich countries, the plutocrat class has continued to be enriched, while the middle and lower classes tread
economic water.
A recent U.N. survey of environmental ministries worldwide showed that only four or five countries actually included gender and
economic inequality concerns in their climate change policies, despite the warning from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that the impact climate change «will fall disproportionately upon developing countries and the poor persons
within all countries.»
The current
economic system against which the «occupation» protest across the industrialised world are directed, both creates and depends on unsustainable consumption, and has driven income and asset
inequality within and between nations.
These large human impacts on the Earth System must be considered
within the context of the large global
economic inequality to realize that current levels of resource extraction and throughput only support societies at First World living standards for ∼ 17 % of the world's current population [1].
Demographic transformation, the emergence of new centres of
economic dynamism, accelerating
inequality within and across nations, challenges to the existing social contract by a disillusioned, mobilized citizenry, technological and organizational transformation linking people directly as never before and climate change are all placing the foundations of our world and our global system under unprecedented stress.
There are strengths and limitations to both absolute and relative measures of low income, and use of relative measures, such as those used in the current study, have their merits when used
within countries to identify those at risk of poverty and social exclusion.30 Still, Norway has low levels of poverty and
economic inequality, which may restrict generalisability of these results.
The second impact of this control relates to the
economic dimensions of the disempowerment of Indigenous peoples: «colonialism continues to survive (
within Australia) by virtue of the structural
inequalities between First Nations and the Crown.»
Gender
inequality within couples intersects with the household's
economic and educational resources.
We conclude that
within - family variation in health is an important contributor to educational
inequalities and socio -
economic life chances.