Not exact matches
Of these, fully half involve creating a new governmental or quasi-governmental agency (such as the Canada
Infrastructure Bank), while the remaining are
so ambiguous as to be potentially meaningless (for example, creating a foreign direct investment strategy «in line with the country's
economic growth strategy»).
The rationale was that stimulus spending should get in and out of the
economic bloodstream pretty quickly,
so you need to find «shovel - ready»
infrastructure projects that don't go on for too long.
So don't expect a focussed debate in the 2015 election on the need for a new
economic growth strategy, one based on a federal - provincial initiative to modernize our
infrastructure, and create better
economic prospects.
So don't expect a focussed debate in the 2015 election on the need for a new
economic growth strategy, one based on a federal provincial initiative to modernize our
infrastructure, and create better
economic prospects.
And for hundreds of years, governments have undertaken basic
infrastructure spending
so that private owners would not use monopoly privileges to charge
economic rent.
The Bank of Canada will continue to focus on what it does best: supporting the
economic and financial well - being of Canada by achieving low, stable and predictable inflation; by keeping core financial market
infrastructure safe; and by giving sound advice on financial sector policies
so that vulnerabilities do not get in the way of sustainable, productive growth for all Canadians.
I will say this: when you have a debt - financed
infrastructure program or tax cut, there will be pockets within the economy that will benefit, but the aggregate
economic performance will not benefit and
so fiscal policy, as I see it, is not really going to be helpful.
Far too often can «innovation» become a buzzword in today's new globalized
economic reality, as governments seek to find new ways to increase GDP and revenues
so they can sustain the critical social programs and public
infrastructure so many Canadians rely upon.
For example: natural resources system,
economic system, animal health system, animal protection system, education system,
infrastructure system and
so on.
And
so you have to build social and
economic infrastructure first and then after that you put livelihood empowerment on top of it.»
This should include formalised working with code system operators to share investment in
infrastructure so that pooled demand can create
economic justification for fibre provision to remote areas.»
Peter, unless you can demonstrate a credible way of doing
so, without damaging both crucial services and the
infrastructure and innovation architecture on which the entire economy depends, I suggest that any
economic policy that does claim that it can eliminate the budget deficit — however you define that — is not worth the paper it is written on...
The candidates talk a lot about job creation and
economic development, with Espaillat condemning the growth of
so - called big box stores and Walrond promoting
infrastructure investment, but there is not a policy issue driving the race.
§ The DfT does not have sufficient understanding of the
economic impact and regeneration benefits of transport
infrastructure, compared with alternatives,
so is not able to make fully - informed investment decisions.
Under the leadership of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, the departments of New York State government, local governments,
economic development agencies such as the Rockland Economic Development Corporation, and the private sector are working hand in hand to create jobs and improve infrastructure so that New York, and places like Rockland County, are attractive places to work, live, an
economic development agencies such as the Rockland
Economic Development Corporation, and the private sector are working hand in hand to create jobs and improve infrastructure so that New York, and places like Rockland County, are attractive places to work, live, an
Economic Development Corporation, and the private sector are working hand in hand to create jobs and improve
infrastructure so that New York, and places like Rockland County, are attractive places to work, live, and visit.
«That's why I've decided to join the Independent Democratic Conference, where I can best affect progressive change on issues like affordable housing, higher education, school funding equity, homelessness reforms,
economic development,
infrastructure upgrades, affordable healthcare, senior citizen protections and
so much more,» Peralta said in the statement.
It also will open the fiscal space
so that government can undertake even greater steps to stimulate the real economy in ways that provides jobs and builds the
infrastructure needed for sustained
economic development.
That's why I've decided to join the Independent Democratic Conference, where I can best affect progressive change on issues like affordable housing, higher education, school funding equity, homelessness reforms,
economic development,
infrastructure upgrades, affordable healthcare, senior citizen protections and
so much more.
Others, including Gov. Andrew Cuomo, suggest spending more surplus dollars on
economic development,
so extra tax dollars would allow local governments to better fund
infrastructure projects on their own.
«When the
infrastructure sector suffers and we don't have good roads that can propel
economic activity, it will end up affecting the GDP
so there are
so many factors to consider.
So far, the governor has detailed plans to spend $ 3.3 billion: $ 1.5 billion will be doled out in a competition to spur
economic development in three upstate regions; $ 1.3 billion will go to the Thruway Authority to help prevent toll hikes and offset the cost of building the replacement Tappan Zee Bridge; and $ 500 million will be used to build out broadband internet
infrastructure in remote areas.
Because
infrastructure development is
so expensive, in a tough
economic climate it is safer to be innovative in service provision than in hardware development.
Needed: a strategy to promote resilience Compiling a list of suggestions, they push federal agencies to «make resilience a core aspect of all federal
infrastructure and disaster - recovery funding» to strengthen affordable housing; ask for federal leaders to expand funding for programs, such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program,
so at - risk municipalities can develop disaster plans and assess their vulnerabilities; and boost
economic stability by opposing cuts to the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program, or SNAP,
so families can afford to eat after a disaster.
ALBANY — Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, delivering his State of the State address along with a budget proposal heavy on
infrastructure, laid out an ambitious social agenda on Wednesday that focuses on problems not
so easily solved with cash: the erosion of confidence in the criminal justice system, public schools and teachers that he said were failing students, and a creeping sense that
economic mobility is not what it once was.
In the interest of disclosure, I'll mention a few: One occurs if a new energy source puts carbon - based sources «out of business» and displaces them quickly, even without any cost assigned to carbon dioxide emissions: In other words, if the
economic cost of the new energy source is
so low that it completely and quickly beats even the lowest - cost carbon - based sources (even without a «carbon price») and justifies investments associated with replacing the associated
infrastructure.
So, what do you think the US could do to lessen the
economic burden to our society for replacing our energy
infrastructure by investing money to help build cleaner energy
infrastructure in developing countries?
Subsequently Mauritius experienced the benefit of the
so - called demographic bonus through a decline in youth dependency combined with still very low old age dependency, resulting in a period of
economic growth, investments in
infrastructure, and further education.
The solution then, is to be found in re-balancing the underlying landscape of incentives,
so that
economic activity is directed towards restoring the environment, and rehabilitating the
economic infrastructure towards this end.
But the US far more
so because of the massive
economic boost in terms of jobs and much - needed
infrastructure, as well as the critical need for longer term energy supply security.
Though the state has weathered
economic downturns before, it hasn't had to do
so with billions of dollars of
infrastructure fixes necessitated by melting permafrost.
Decision - makers, by contrast, need to understand how climate change may interfere with their plans and compromise their objectives,
so they can adapt existing policies and adopt new strategies to stay on track — whether to protect life, health, and well - being, sustain
economic growth, preserve natural resources, ensure continued performance of critical
infrastructure, or maintain national security.
Social and
economic disadvantage further reduces the capacity to adapt to rapid environmental change, and
so this problem is compounded on many of the Islands which lack adequate
infrastructure, health services and employment opportunities.