(I can attest that in my own kids» school,
economic need seems to play no role in who takes the meal and who doesn't.)
Not exact matches
Worryingly for Emanuel's administration, the union
seems to be framing the dispute as a tradeoff between education and
economic development, with Sharkey noting that, «We
need to be asking why we're spending on things like river walks when our schools aren't funded.»
This may also be why PBoC Governor Zhou — who was among the first senior policymakers, I believe, to recognize the urgent
need for China to rebalance
economic growth away from the current debt - addicted model —
seems to be among the key
economic decision - makers.
«The residents of all locations
seem to be generally aware of the current
economic conditions in their area, with the perceived «
need» of landing Amazon higher amongst locations with unemployment rates above the national average,» said Sheridan from Elon's Love School of Business.
If it had ended, then it would
seem appropriate to ask what policies are now
needed if our concern is to improve
economic welfare of people rather than increase production for its own sake.
This god named Mammon — money or wealth — commands the devotion of so many in our society that we
need to ask how we as Christians can deal with a pagan god whose worship
seems institutionalized in our very
economic system.
The political
needs of men struggling for survival or status, the
economic needs of hungry and competitive men, the psychological
needs of anxious and guilty interpersonal beings, these and other highly important wants
seemed to require the ministrations of the Church.
Moreover, the minorities in our midst who have taken seriously the
need for Protestants in North America to distance ourselves from the world view of our conventional socio -
economic constituency
seem to me to err, often, in two fundamental ways:
Yet others are champions of globalization who
seem to believe that the unstoppable
economic dynamics of Wall Street and Silicon Valley have brought us to the point that we really don't
need a foreign policy.
The trick is that Huckabee's
economic populism
needs to be a middle - class - oriented reformism that
seems to add up.
Present - day society is locked into four positive feedback loops which
need to be broken:
economic growth which feeds on itself, population growth which feeds on itself, technological change which feeds on itself, and a pattern of income inequality which
seems to be self - sustaining and which tends to spur growth in the other three areas.
Or a society in which a certain percentage of people will be «inevitably» unemployed may
seem to be the only plausible
economic order; but what about the
needs of the unemployed?
Since the three main Westminster political parties all endorse the conclusions of Sir Ian Wood's recent review on how to maximise the
economic recovery of oil and gas from the UK Continental Shelf (Search for UKCS Maximising Recovery Review Final Report, here), and its tacit underlying fiscal premises (namely that there is a
need for a simplified fiscal regime to incentivise investment and drilling activity, as well as to ease the burden upon the new regulator of the upstream sector), it does not take the gift of prophecy to appreciate that the ultimate outcome of this subsequent review on the shape of the UK fiscal regime
seems foreordained; namely, a return to the situation that prevailed before the introduction of SC, whereby the only levy on income from oil and gas fields is to be Corporation Income Tax at the standard rate levied on the likes of Starbucks and Amazon.
Through the poignant juxtaposition of citizenship and slavery, young people's protest against attacks on their
economic activity and more broadly against the employment crisis, reflects their efforts to force their way to political recognition, rather than existing a political space that
seems to exclude their voices and
needs.
«We
need to think deeper about why we
seem out of touch to so many and understand the demands of cultural anxiety as well as
economic prosperity.»
The political season will be in full swing when letters and campaign brochures from candidates talk about the
need for
economic development, which doesn't
seem to get the same focus of attention after they get sworn into office.
While there remains more of a political and policy
need to explain how the
economic pie will be grown, key themes of the Clinton (Bill) and Blair years, than Miliband often
seemed to acknowledge, there is also an enhanced political and policy focus on how the pie will be distributed, which portends much, including an IDS - like rehabilitation for Miliband.
With the nation's
economic recovery seemingly stuck in low gear, the
need to better understand the link between learning and a career
seems more critical than ever for high school students preparing to graduate and enter the next phase of their lives.
As the quality of life is so often defined in terms of material living standards and national income per person, it might
seem paradoxical to claim that environmental restrictions on
economic growth
need not involve sacrificing our quality of life.
As apparently affluent as it may
seem, the two - income household is hypersensitive to any
economic downturn because it
needs every penny to get by.
The assumption is the saver will
need that money more in 30 years than today, when housing prices
seem stretched beyond
economic fundamentals.
`... be followed by a scenario where, almost at the snap of a finger,
economic growth, risk appetite and especially inflation will start firing monstrously on all cylinders... Therefore, there
seems to be plenty of time to kill before you really
need to jump into those real asset / inflation pure plays.»
But only to be followed by a scenario where, almost at the snap of a finger,
economic growth, risk appetite and especially inflation will start firing monstrously on all cylinders... Therefore, there
seems to be plenty of time to kill before you really
need to jump into those real asset / inflation pure plays.
The distributed sharing economy now
seems to show us that the property speculation that broke the markets in 2007 — 08 was actually no small matter at all, but actually a profound antimatter made out of regimes of visuality and visibility that are so sophisticated that we
need technologies developed in the contemporary arts to untangle the meshing of their symbolic, informational, and
economic values.
That
seems to be happening, a sharply steepening learning curves for everything
needed to stabilize our rate of
economic expansion at once, the «gold standard» direct indicator of whole system limits.
This
seems to miss the concept of overshoot: «What portion of annual global
economic growth would
need to be sacrificed to keep CO2 concentration in the atmosphere from exceeding 550 ppm?»
We
need to reduce carbon emissions for climate reasons, and should leave fossil fuels in the ground even if it means losing short - term
economic benefits, but exposing Australia and the world to greater climate risk for no good reason
seems like madness.
Your «solution»
seems more likely to cause more problems to humanity, especially if the 3rd World countries are not able to get the
economic and technical assistance from the Western economies that they desperately
need.
I guess I didn't really
need a link anyhow, but it
seemed an
economic way to intro the notion of doubt.
With so many Americans unemployed or otherwise suffering from the
economic decline, it
seems overkill to charge a premium for one of the necessities of life — car insurance — to someone who
needs it most.
A safety net is something we all
need during trying
economic times, though it may
seem like an expense we can overlook.
(1) the child in question is not three years of age or younger; (2) both parents
seem reasonably capable of meeting the child's
need for care and guidance; (3) both parents wish to continue their active involvement in raising the child; (4) the parents
seem capable of making reasoned decisions together for the benefit of the child;... (5) joint custody would not impose substantial
economic hardship on the parent who opposes it; and (6) joint custody wouldprobably disrupt the parent - child relationships less than other custodial alternatives.
It
seems so cynical and inappropriate of the big retailers to start telling people (who are living in particularly grim
economic times just now in England) that they
need to start buying overpriced sparkly, Christmassy imports from China in October.