Sentences with phrase «economic output between»

The team's report concludes that a $ 3.8 - billion federal investment (equivalent to $ 5.6 billion in 2010 dollars) produced $ 796 billion in economic output between 1988 and 2010 and, in 2010 alone, supported 310,000 jobs.

... The IMF had originally projected Greece would lose 5.5 % of its economic output between 2009 and 2012.

Not exact matches

The output gap — the difference between current economic output and the estimated level that would stoke inflation — will now close in mid-2018, «materially later» than previously thought, the statement said.

More normal economic growth would eliminate the so - called output gap — the difference between what the economy can produce and what it is producing.

Yes, the G7 output gap — the difference between actual output and economic potential — is shrinking as the U.S. economy has joined Germany, the UK and Canada in running near full capacity.

Mr. Trump plans to axe the Trans - Pacific Partnership, an ambitious trade agreement between 12 countries (including the U.S. and Canada) that account for 40 per cent of global economic output.

Between 1989 and the late 1990s, the economic output of the former Soviet Union declined by a nearly unimaginable 40 %, resulting in terrible destruction to personal incomes.

The planned creation of 1,600 megawatts of offshore wind power should create over 3,000 «job years» during construction over the next ten years and generate between $ 675 million and $ 800 million in direct economic output in Massachusetts.

The CEBR report found that if the Government raised the rate of corporation tax from 21 per cent to 26 per cent - the result of equalising the tax rate between big and small business - would cost around 100,000 jobs from the small business sector and reduce economic output by # 4.3 bn, while reducing the public sector deficit by only # 1.6 bn over 10 years.

This investment will create about 25,000 middle class jobs and between $ 3 billion and $ 4 billion in economic output for the state, according to the Partnership for New York City.

The shift would reduce economic output by between 2 - 6 percent by 2050, because of the costs of building a cleaner energy system based on low - carbon energies that are more expensive than abundant coal, the IPCC said.

The impact on economic output across the world is projected to be US$ 5.36 trillion between 2011 and 2030.

Included in the PowerPoint: Macroeconomic Objectives (AS Level) a) Aggregate Demand (AD) and Aggregate Supply (AS) analysis - the shape and determinants of AD and AS curves; AD = C+I+G + (X-M)- the distinction between a movement along and a shift in AD and AS - the interaction of AD and AS and the determination of the level of output, prices and employment b) Inflation - the definition of inflation; degrees of inflation and the measurement of inflation; deflation and disinflation - the distinction between money values and real data - the cause of inflation (cost - push and demand - pull inflation)- the consequences of inflation c) Balance of payments - the components of the balance of payments accounts (using the IMF / OECD definition): current account; capital and financial account; balancing item - meaning of balance of payments equilibrium and disequilibrium - causes of balance of payments disequilibrium in each component of the accounts - consequences of balance of payments disequilibrium on domestic and external economy d) Exchange rates - definitions and measurement of exchange rates - nominal, real, trade - weighted exchange rates - the determination of exchange rates - floating, fixed, managed float - the factors underlying changes in exchange rates - the effects of changing exchange rates on the domestic and external economy using AD, Marshall - Lerner and J curve analysis - depreciation / appreciation - devaluation / revaluation e) The Terms of Trade - the measurement of the terms of trade - causes of the changes in the terms of trade - the impact of changes in the terms of trade f) Principles of Absolute and comparative advantage - the distinction between absolute and comparative advantage - free trade area, customs union, monetary union, full economic union - trade creation and trade diversion - the benefits of free trade, including the trading possibility curve g) Protectionism - the meaning of protectionism in the context of international trade - different methods of protection and their impact, for example, tariffs, import duties and quotas, export subsidies, embargoes, voluntary export restraints (VERs) and excessive administrative burdens («red tape»)- the arguments in favor of protectionism This PowerPoint is best used when using worksheets and activities to help reinforce the ideas talked about.

Using the nearly $ 3 trillion drop in economic output resulting from the recent economic recession as a reference point, the author suggests that the achievement gap between the U.S. and academically top - performing countries «can be said to be causing the equivalent of a permanent recession.»

Although this observation is true in some respects, it fails to take into account the time lag involved between a nation's stock of human capital and its economic output.

A persistent gap in academic achievement between children in the United States and their counterparts in other countries deprived the US economy of as much as $ 2.3 trillion in economic output in 2008, McKinsey research finds.1 1.

The output gap is the difference between actual and potential economic output.

4 The output gap is an economic measure of the difference between the actual output of an economy and its potential output.

I've inverted the inventory curve to highlight the close relationship between the two metrics, so what you're seeing is an inverse relationship between growth in the inventories - to - shipments ratio (blue) and economic output (red), as defined by non-defense durable good shipments, excluding aircraft.

The following chart shows a similar inverse relationship between growth in the inventory - to - sales ratio and economic output, as defined by industrial production.

According to the study, the cumulative regional economic benefits between the 2001 and 2011 period include more than $ 65 billion in economic output.

Imagine a scenario in which global warming would lead to zero costs between now and the year 2200, at which point global economic growth would be permanently reduced by 0.1 percent — in other words, that economic output starting in 2200 would be 99.9 percent of what it would have been had there been no global warming.

«When you look at B.C.'s policies,» says Mark Jaccard, an environmental economist at Simon Fraser University, «you see the very same things we saw in the first years of the Swedish policy, which is the beginning of this disconnect between economic output and emissions.»