That implies that land use CO2 sink enhancement might have a much greater impact on reducing atmospheric and ocean CO2 more quickly than radical scared out your knickers,
economically damaging mitigation at all cost ala Greg the idiot Craven.
Not exact matches
It follows that to avert $ 5 trillion in
damages, it would be
economically advisable to expend in excess of $ 1 trillion now on climate
mitigation even if we are uncertain about which discount rate to apply.