Not exact matches
This study, published in a recent issue
of the Journal
of Environmental
Economics and Management, is the first to use financial investors»
actions, rather than self - reported opinions, to investigate the trans - Atlantic difference in public opinion
on climate change and the environment.
Then the British Government's chief adviser
on the
economics of climate change may not have made the mistake
of asserting that urgent
action was necessary to avoid what he portrayed as a «business - as - usual» outcome.
Going down this path, you'll quickly find yourself in a debate
on discounting and the time value
of action / resources, which will take you deep into discussions
of subjects such as environmental ethics, future / present generations, the foundational assumtions
of the discipline
of economics, etc. — all very important and interesting subjects, but ones
on which there is unlikely to be forged a new consensus
on meaningful time scales related to
climate change.
Then the British Government's chief adviser
on the
economics of climate change may not have made the mistake
of asserting that urgent
action was necessary to avoid what he portrayed as a «business - as - usual» outcome.
The economic constraint
on environmental
action can easily be seen by looking at what is widely regarded as the most far - reaching establishment attempt to date to deal with The
Economics of Climate Change in the form of a massive study issued in 2007 under that title, commissioned by the UK Treasury Office.7 Subtitled the Stern Review after the report's principal author Nicholas Stern, a former chief economist of the World Bank, it is widely viewed as the most important, and most progressive mainstream treatment of the economics of global warming.8 The Stern Review focuses on the target level of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) concentration in the atmosphere necessary to stabilize global average temperature at no more than 3 °C (5.4 °F) over pre-industria
Economics of Climate Change in the form
of a massive study issued in 2007 under that title, commissioned by the UK Treasury Office.7 Subtitled the Stern Review after the report's principal author Nicholas Stern, a former chief economist
of the World Bank, it is widely viewed as the most important, and most progressive mainstream treatment
of the
economics of global warming.8 The Stern Review focuses on the target level of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) concentration in the atmosphere necessary to stabilize global average temperature at no more than 3 °C (5.4 °F) over pre-industria
economics of global warming.8 The Stern Review focuses
on the target level
of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) concentration in the atmosphere necessary to stabilize global average temperature at no more than 3 °C (5.4 °F) over pre-industrial levels.
Lord Stern, the former World Bank chief economist whose landmark report
on the
economics of climate change warned the world risked plunging into economic depression if
action was not taken urgently
on greenhouse gases, said carbon trading was a «key plank» in dealing with
climate change.
The opponents
of climate change policies have largely succeeded in opposing proposed
climate change law and policy by claiming that government
action on climate change should be opposed because: (1) it will impose unacceptable costs
on national
economics or specific industries and destroy jobs, (2) there is too much scientific uncertainty to warrant government
action, or (3) it would be unfair and ineffective for nations like the United States to adopt expensive
climate policies as long as China or India fail to adopt serious greenhouse gas emissions reductions policies.
The opponents
of climate change policies have succeeded in opposing proposed
climate change law and policy by claiming that government
action on climate change should be opposed because: (1) it will impose unacceptable costs
on national
economics or specific industries and destroy jobs, (2) there is too much scientific uncertainty to warrant government
action, or (3) it would be unfair and ineffective for nations like the United States to adopt expensive
climate policies as long as China or India fail to adopt serious greenhouse gas emissions reductions policies.
Way, way back in the 2000s, when everyone believed in Hockey Sticks, the UK's Labour government commissioned somebody nobody had ever heard
of to write a report
on the
economics of climate change, so that it could make an argument for domestic and international political
action.