Sentences with phrase «economics of pipeline»

Lost in yesterday's hysteria, meanwhile, was the fact many savvy observers of the oil industry have been saying for months the economics of the pipeline expansion were dubious, and predicting therefore that even without protests and talk of B.C. environmental legislation, Kinder Morgan would look for a way to walk away from the deal with its corporate pride intact.

I think that Americans are eager for a serious American energy policy that could both erode the economics of this pipeline and marginalize the «drill baby drill» crowd as childish and irresponsible.

Also the economics of pipeline, much cheaper than rail for oil, make it extremely attractive.

Also the economics of pipeline, much cheaper than rail for oil, make it extremely attractive.

Not exact matches

If the purpose of the pipeline, from a shippers perspective, is to get world prices for oil, then why would this have any effect on refinery economics in Saint John?

«Production growth can not occur unless some of the planned pipeline projects out of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin go ahead,» asserted a TD Economics report in December.

«While the economics look attractive,» TD Economics observed of pipeline prospects in December, «there is more to the world than economiceconomics look attractive,» TD Economics observed of pipeline prospects in December, «there is more to the world than economicEconomics observed of pipeline prospects in December, «there is more to the world than economicseconomics.»

But even if only the pipeline and the port come to fruition, this will radically transform the politics and economics of the north.

Depressed oil and gas prices are jeopardizing energy production levels, possibly impairing the economics of large pipeline growth projects, and potentially creating excess pipeline capacity in certain regions.

This came after 8 years of wasted time on the subject of AGW / CC Energy, and pipelines and Fracking by the Democrats and Obama, the so - called great communicator and Nobel Peace Prize winner ordering murders to be committed by US citizens and their Proxies all across the planet and repeatedly lying through his teeth about all manner of topics Geopolitical, War, and Economics and repeatedly interfering in other nations governments and «Democratic» elections.

I sought reactions to my post on President Obama and the «Alberta tar pit» from a variety of analysts and campaigners examining the economics and environmental impacts of a proposed pipeline linking that Canadian source of oil with American refiners.

As a policy paper last year from the Association of Oil Pipelines and the American Petroleum Institute points out, the economics are also iffy, partly because ethanol plants are relatively small and dispersed.

Approval of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline would have only a marginal positive impact on the economics of the Canadian oil - sands industry, but could nevertheless trigger a rush of high - risk investment into additional projects that would rely heavily on rising oil prices, according to new research from the Carbon Tracker Initiative.

A U.S. decision on the pipeline permit is likely to play a major role in the economics of whether full - scale development of the tar sands will be expedited.

Indeed, our analysis supports recent comments in the EPA's review of the State Department's final impact statement that, with oil prices in a sustained range of $ 65 - $ 75, «construction of the pipeline is projected to change the economics of oil sands development and result in increased oil sands production, and the accompanying greenhouse gas emissions, over what would otherwise occur» [2].

As confirmed by analyst reports, KXL is significant for oil companies who are relying on the pipeline to get improve the economics of their projects enough to make them viable.

This revealed approval of the controversial Keystone XL (KXL) pipeline would only have a marginal positive impact of the economics of the Canadian oil - sands industry, but could trigger a rush of investment into additional risky high - cost, high - carbon projects, dependent on rising oil prices.

Over the past 18 months the Carbon Tracker Initiative has written a number of studies on the economics of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline.

In other words, the supply flexibility brought to the market by a pipeline infrastructure would enable «demand pull» economics to govern the pace of development of Australia's northwest Shelf gas supplies.

A new report by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) and Oil Change International quantifies for the first time the financial and carbon impact of public opposition to pipelines and other expanded investment in tar sands production.

25 November — Approval of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline would have only a marginal positive impact on the economics of the Canadian oil - sands industry, but could nevertheless trigger a rush of high - risk investment into additional projects that would rely heavily on rising oil prices, according to new research from the Carbon Tracker Initiative.

In a report released last week, Oil Change International and the Institute for Energy Economics & Financial Analysis demonstrated how the movement against Keystone XL and other tar sands pipelines has contributed to a decline in the profitability of the tar sands industry.