Sentences with phrase «economists argue»

World economists argue that this phenomenon has no equal among any previous soap bubbles.

In fact, these economists argue that there's no need for governments to regulate Bitcoin due to its decentralized infrastructure.

Economists argue this may be the economically efficient thing for a company to do in a variety of scenarios, e.g. where the employee is not sufficiently productive or the company needs to restructure.

As the damages of climate change tend to increase exponentially with rising temperatures, many economists argue that the biggest impacts of climate change will occur later in the century, and that the main focus should be on reducing longer - term warming.

Climate economists argue, for instance, for a globally harmonized carbon tax even as they acknowledge the extraordinary moral, political and economic obstacles to asking the average African to pay the same toll on her emissions as the average European.

Economists argue that if you are trying to protect an endangered species, then limiting the supply of its products can be counterproductive.

The world as it is in 2008 is simply not sustainable, despite what economists argue.

Economists argue that dynamic pricing can only work in a pure monopoly.

It could be that home prices have a bigger wealth effect than stocks, as some economists argue.

But some economists argue that banks have swung too far in the other direction, by becoming too strict.

Some economists argue that, although certain markets in certain time periods may display a considerable equity risk premium, it is not, in fact, a generalizable concept.

Look at it this way: some economists argue that traditional college will inevitably become more expensive because of the «cost disease.»

Furthermore, many economists argue it is misguided to curb research spending to address the nation's budget crisis, because several studies have shown such spending spurs economic activity far greater than what is invested.

Labour, trade unions and some economists argue that by drastically cutting spending in the public sector the government is preventing demand in the economy, just when international markets become more and more volatile.

The fact the deficit hasn't fallen faster, some economists argue, is partly due to low paid jobs not bringing in sufficient tax revenues.

«economists argue that the poor are better able to decide how they should direct their benefits than the wealthy who pay for them.»

Some economists argue that it was simply the result of the success of the market.

Many economists argue that it is unnecessary to curb economic growth, if we change our presently unwise policies that allow and encourage waste and pollution.

Other economists argue that future low - skill immigration primarily reduces the wages of current foreign - born workers.

Economists argue that it is not their business, or the business of the public, to prefer one set of desired goods over others.

Q: Still, a lot of economists argue things like GST cuts are not nearly as progressive as an income tax cut.

And it is weak on financial services, a key issue for Britain and London itself, and international firms using London to sell services around Europe would have to open new bases inside the bloc, eventually, economists argue, leaching significant staff and investment away.

Some Economists argue that although a new market may grow after an innovation, others soon imitate and begin to eat into the profits of the original innovator.

But Mintz and some fellow economists argue that the tax break will go overwhelmingly to Canadians who need it least and may not result in job growth at all.

The economists argue that even if such a tax was levied at just 0.05 %, it could raise hundreds of billions of dollars, which could be ploughed into development projects.

That wealth, some economists argue, has come at the expense of workers by cutting into the capital spending that supports long - term growth — and jobs.

Meanwhile liberal economists argue over a tuning of the Phillips curve, Taylor Rule, and NAIRU, as if picking the right inflation target, unemployment level, and interest rates are all that's required.

Some economists argue that even if there are short - term benefits to American producers and workers, over the longer - term trade intervention is harmful for U.S. productivity growth.

Some prominent economists argue that our deficits are not the real problem.

And many economists argue that demographics will eventually limit how much more hiring can happen.

But on the flip side, many economists argue that tariffs would just lead to artificial price inflation.

As a result, economists argue politicians should be doing everything possible to ensure the private sector in this country is strong enough to support the economy when stimulus dollars disappear and central banks tighten monetary policy.

In other words, Osborne's cuts could lead to another downturn, which is why some economists argue he should put down the axe until the global economy strengthens.

Some business owners argue that raising the minimum wage will lead to higher prices for consumers, and some economists argue that it could depress job growth or even end up eliminating positions as it leads to more automation.

But other economists argue that if inflation is a monetary issue, and a helicopter drop of cash is fundamentally fiscal, then the worry over sparking inflation is misplaced.

Although it's often cast as a means of spurring domestic consumption, some economists argue the real objective is currency devaluation.

In the 1880s, the most sophisticated railroad managers and some economists argued that railroads were «natural monopolies,» the inevitable consequence of an industry that required huge investments in rights of way over land, constructing railways, and building train engines and rail cars.

Classical economists argued that this ex post balance would occur in a way that kept the economy quite stable at full employment.

Economists arguing the US has additional unused capacity cite the country's participation rate, which is its total workforce divided by total population.

Some economists argued that such a concern has made it all the more important for the government to engineer steady but mild increases in lending rates, letting asset markets adjust to the inevitable rise in borrowing costs in a progressive and orderly manner.

Some economists argued that a centralized bureaucracy could plan economic growth most effectively.

I don't think I have ever seen an economist argue that.

But in response to a recent e360 article by the co-founders of the Breakthrough Institute, an economist argues we must also cap emissions or put a price on carbon in order to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.

The American economist argues that cryptocurrency isn't as useful as many think it to be.

Not exact matches

In the other corner sit mainstream business economists, who argue that Carney, in a rare occurrence, missed the point.

It is at this point analysts and economists invariably argue none of China's overspending and debt really matters.

For years economists — not to mention everyday Americans hanging out on bar stools or on Twitter — have argued about why even mediocre CEOs get paid such ridiculous sums of money.

The problem with Flaherty's approach to what economists call «macroprudential» policy is that it isn't as democratic as he argued it to be.

In 2014 he argued lower oil prices are unambiguously good — versus the Fed's and most economists» view that there are winners and losers to lower oil prices as the U.S. has become a bigger producer.

Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, argues that millennials are only one segment of the population driving demand in both cities.