Sentences with phrase «economists do»

Home prices, which are still below their 2006 peaks, have been rising in the past couple of years, and economists do not see much risk of a significant drop in the near term.

As for Trump's plan to create 25 million jobs, Wallace commented that even conservative economists don't think the numbers add up and that it is unrealistic.

As well there is lots of confusion with regard to international trade and international investment: they are not the same and economists do not make that mistake, but legal people do (too much law, not enough knowledge of economics).

It isn't the end of modern economic theory, economists don't rely on continual growth to work their theories, they are just as happy to tell you how much your shrinking as how much your growing.

And I think that's a big mistake because when you read a lot of economic analyses of climate change, you are struck with a very worrisome sense that the economists don't understand the science, don't appreciate the gravity of the situation.

Nonetheless, economists do their best to make a range of reasonable estimates for plausible futures and calculate the resulting changes in emissions.

IPCC «does» climate science, economists do economics.

Economists do not seem to have a big culture of model intercomparison and verification.

In truth, economists don't agree on any policy issue except free trade, as academic surveys have repeatedly confirmed.

But economists don't favor such a magical conception.

Unfortunately, Nordhaus and most other economists don't understand this alternative approach.

Economists don't think you do.

Economists don't agree on too many things; but on one thing they are unanimous.

The other bureaucrats, engineers and economists do not know about equilibrium.

This claim isn't derived from his research *, but is his judgement, based on the same kind of assessment of stochastic trends that economists do, and very similar to the judgements involved in relating smoking and cancer.

Economists don't just love them because of theory; they work, especially in bounded markets where demand is elastic or substitution is cheap.

* Economists do not know very much * Other people, including the politicians who make economic policy, know even less about economics than economists do.»

Few people understand economics quantitatively — I'm just amazed economists do.

I agree the intangible aspects of the environment's value is not amenable to being expressed in dollars, and economists do not propose to do that.

The climate sensitivity is an important parameter we must consider, but engineers and economists don't need certaintity to start planning, we just need to understand the uncertainty exists.

The world economists don't put a value on all of those social and environmental goods, partially because they're hard to quantify, but also partially because our economy is fixated on one metric, which is money.

Yup — economists don't care about getting the answer right, just the attitude of the student.

Economists do consider quality of life issues, though there is no consensus on how best to deal with them in cost benefit analyses.

Modern economists don't talk much about Jevons Paradox, but they do admit that the problem exists and refer it to «rebound.»

The Fed has sworn to keep hands off rates until unemployment dips below 6.5 percent, which economists don't expect until after midyear 2014.

Futures traders have no better information than economists do.

Economists don't really agree on what constitutes a middle class income.

While most economists don't think rates will spike any time soon, the possibility of modest and gradual rate rises is a significant risk.)

No need to worry about this year's equity rally — leading CIBC economists don't think the TSX is overheating.

Economists don't see this as similar to the subprime mortgage crisis, where people took out loans they couldn't afford and became delinquent.

@GaelicTorus @justinwolfers All I am saying is value investors understand how the economy works better than neoclassical economists do $ $ May 07, 2012

While the Federal Reserve said they wouldn't raise rates until 2014, Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics and many more economists don't believe that they'll be able to stick to that promise.

Economists don't expect the central bank to raise its key interest rate target any time soon, but it remains well below what is considered a normal level.

.@OVVOFinancial Part of what I am saying is economists don't understand macro well.

Economists don't know whether prices will fall a little, a lot, or stay about the same, but no one sees significant increases in the foreseeable future.

Even market economists themselves don't believe in it anymore.

Modern economists don't talk much about Jevons Paradox, but they do admit that the problem exists and refer it to «rebound.»

Employing the comparative method with such natural experiments of history is no different from what sociologists and economists do in comparing natural experiments of society today.

Indeed, when pressed, economists do not consider government expenditures in general as a contribution to the economic well being of the nation.

Of course, many individual economists do care about how income is distributed on the basis of ideas about human beings derived from sources other than their discipline.

Economists do not do well in accounting for these activities.

Although economists don't anticipate a rate hike until December, the markets don't see more than a 50 % chance of an increase until March 2016.

This is something the economists don't talk about — all they look at is appreciation.

Of course, TV - talking heads don't discuss this bearish indicator, but serious, unbiased economists do.

Mainstream economists don't think a trade deficit is bad for the US economy, and they doubt that slapping tariffs on imports will do much to reduce it.

Most economists do expect paychecks to start rising faster for most workers this year but for a different reason: The unemployment rate is projected to fall further and could reach a five - decade low of 3.5 %.

Most economists do not expect a rate change during the bank's January meeting.

Other economists don't agree that you need $ 350,000 to be considered rich, however an amount of money that exceeds $ 200,000 per year is enough for a family to lead a more than comfortable lifestyle; this means having the chance to live in a big house, send the kids to private schools, have enough money to travel internationally, own at least 2 cars, and have no debt except a mortgage which will help them build equity.

What these mainstream economists do not realize is that our bubble problems didn't end with the housing bubble.

Futures traders have no better information than economists do.