Sentences with phrase «economy benefits because»

Not exact matches

«We want free and fair trade, because that benefits our country, our workforce and our economy,» Cornyn added.

But the cruel irony is that any improvement in demand and output conditions in these three countries will partly leak out and benefit the euro area countries with large trade surpluses because their economies are running on exports rather than domestic demand.

It's also a career in high demand, and the net benefit to the economy is huge because software can be resold over and over.

As for any «legacy benefits» from the Games, Baade says they are often difficult for emerging economies to capture because those countries are often remote and therefore less likely to draw repeat tourists.

«Canadians broadly believe in shifting towards cleaner sources of energy, because they are convinced doing so will benefit the planet, and are unconvinced by the argument that such a transition would gravely damage the economy.

In an interview with the Post, Sir Ronald Sanders, Antigua and Barbuda's Ambassador Extraordinary to the United States, said Xiao was granted special diplomatic status because of his - «contacts with high level and high net - worth individuals who could benefit our nation's economy».

So, for example, I would argue that in the early stages of reform, especially in countries that have suffered many years of terrible economies and weak investment, crony capitalism can be consistent with high levels of growth because the kinds of programs that lead to growth — mostly massive investment programs in countries in which capital stock is excessively low — benefit the elites directly.

In addition to benefiting from some of the same forces that support emerging markets overall, we believe India's economy is turning the corner largely because of a two - year rout in energy prices.

The gas projects have encountered somewhat less opposition, in part because of the perceived lower environmental damage from a gas pipeline or tanker accident, but also because the economic fundamentals of gas exports provide more benefits to the local economy because much of the gas will come from BC fields and the need for construction and operation of LNG facilities on the coast.

It is only popular because it boosts some prices relative to other prices, thus temporarily benefiting some parts of the economy at the expense of other parts, and because the early users of the new money get to do the bulk of their spending / investing before prices rise.

Small - capitalization US equities would also benefit, but disproportionately because they tend to move more violently than large stocks with accelerations and decelerations in the economy, and they should benefit disproportionately from deregulation.

Because many businesses benefit from higher consumer spending, the economy index includes state poverty rates and the individual earnings gap between men and women, both from the 2015 ACS.

We went from «Don't fight the FEDs, don't fight Central Banks» to «who cares about Central Banks» because everything is fine in the economy and there is disbelief that we're making the transition from a reliance on monetary policy to the benefits of a fiscal policy and synchronized growth.

In theory, at least, this can be a win - win - win solution to the problem of underwater homes: Homeowners instantly reduce their monthly payments and begin building positive equity in their homes; mortgage lenders benefit because above - water homeowners are far less likely to default and the foreclosure process is very expensive for banks; and the process helps speed recovery for the entire economy.

«Though we already pay # 11 billion a year to subsidise a low - wage economy because employers are not paying people enough to live on, volunteers up and down the country are providing a further # 30 million a year in «free» labour to ensure that our fellow citizens in low paid work, on zero hour contracts, or relying on a broken benefits system have enough to eat.

It is the idea that in an economy, if the top layers are allowed to flourish, especially unrestrained, then their success will result in an influx of money into the economy, which will in turn benefit ALL layers of the economy, because more money in means more money for all.

And we all benefit as taxpayers because it pumps money into the economy.

The supporters of that choice can appeal to the idea that when each individual and enterprise strives for its own gain all benefit, because the whole economy grows.

The same people who will benefit from an expanded green economy won't suffer from an expanded gambling economy, because they'd rather dine at an upscale (but tastefully casual) restaurant in Brooklyn that specializes in locally sourced food and sustainable agriculture than get on a bus to go to a «Las Vegas — style» casino in the Catskills.

Even though the economy has forced consumers to be more cost - conscious, organic foods still have a place in many shoppers» baskets because they want the benefits of food prepared without preservatives, artificial ingredients or pesticides.

The opportunities for Australia are immense not just in terms of the potential benefit to the Australian economy through future jobs and export earners, but also because Australians will benefit from better and more cost - effective health products and services as a flow on effect from a thriving domestic MTP industry.

More people could be pushed into Britain's informal economy because of new government sanctions imposed on benefit claimants, a think - tank has claimed.

It was sidelined because of the net benefit to the economy from EU immigration.

«The reality is that migrants from other EU countries are very beneficial to the UK's economy, notably because they help to address skills shortages and pay more tax and social security contributions per head, and get fewer benefits, than UK workers; that free movement of workers is a key part of the EU's single market; that hundreds of thousands of UK nationals work in other EU countries.»

«The Treasury will have a very clear view of what they want to see in terms of negotiations, in terms of tactics that doesn't damage the British economy, because at the end of the day that will benefit absolutely no one in this country,» she said.

Stefanik's spokesman said the congresswoman thinks the issue is important because it could benefit her constituents who visit Syracuse regularly, and help grow the economy along the I - 81 corridor.

GM is also considering Ford's technology, because it offers weight benefits in eliminating the torque converter and thus fuel economy improvements, but «we would ensure it had good drive quality before we would allow it to sell,» says Roger Clark, senior manager of the GM Energy Center.

Increases of that size are of course no longer possible today, but biomedical research should remain a high priority, not only because of its benefits to human health but also because of its impact on the U.S. economy.

Nearly 200 nations agreed in Paris in 2015 to work together to cut emissions to keep warming in check - although President Donald Trump has since decided to exit the accord because, he says, it would cost the U.S. economy trillions of dollars without benefit.

The Census Bureau is benefiting from more educated workers who can't get jobs in their chosen fields because of the sluggish economy.

Mutual fund benefits through economies of scale and pay lesser cost of brokerage because of larger volumes which allows them to reduce costs significantly.

Because stocks love to turn bullish before the broad economy picks up, look for a shift in demand to the stocks that benefit first from economic growth.

That is because the Fed funds rate is down at the zero bound, and monetary policy is being conducted through «credit easing» — using the Fed's balance sheet to benefit troubled lending markets, rather than the economy as a whole.

â $ œSin stocksâ $ like these are often excellent investments, particularly in bad times, because they tend to benefit from steady customers, no matter which way the economy is headed.

I think Warren Buffett purchased BNI because he thinks the American economy will recover and BNI will benefit from the recovery.

Brownsville offers a wide variety of rental housing to fit nearly any budget, which makes living here much easier, but prices are sure to rise in the very near future as the economy improves even further, so it benefits you to lock in a reasonably long lease because that locks down your price for that period of time.

When the Fed does not allow a significant recession to occur, one proportionate to the amount of bad loans made, but comes to the rescue to reflate, what gets reflated is the healthy parts of the economy that absorb additional leverage, not the part that is impaired because they can't benefit from low rates.

Social Security won't swing it, and in another 10 - 15 years, benefits will begin to be reduced in real terms, because the economy will not be able to bear it.

He has said the current OAS program is sustainable because the money used to fund benefits comes directly out of general revenues; as the elderly population and economy continue to grow, so too will revenues.

While these developments may slow the pace of recovery because spending and credit makes our economy go, there will be long - term benefits if we get the balance right.

I'd argue that this is a poor development for travelers, because many Basic Economy fares for flights in the future are the same price as the lowest fares out today, yet come with fewer benefits.

With regard to the economic cost - benefit analyses of global warming, or of a climate treaty to brake it, it should be pointed out that economists must ignore the alternate new pathways that the economy will doubtless take under the vibrancy of capitalism, because these do not presently exist.

What could be done slowly but surely = - an acceleration of the decarbonization of the US economy at little real cost (because of the $ benefits of saved energy) has to be rushed now.

With low tax rates, they take their money out of tax shelters and put it to work in the economy, benefitting themselves, the economy and government, which collects more money in taxes because incomes rise.

And in terms of this program today, there's an enormous benefit in terms of the long - term transition to a carbon - free economy, because while — out here in California half of our greenhouse gas emissions come from transportation.

We are stuck because the actions that would give us the best chance of averting catastrophe — and would benefit the vast majority — are extremely threatening to an elite minority that has a stranglehold over our economy, our political process, and most of our major media outlets.

Because of natural gas, the opportunity is before us to strengthen our economy, benefit consumers and increase U.S. energy security — all while making significant climate progress.

Because renewables do not require fuel and because they are based on technologies that benefit from both advancement and economies of scale, they are able to continuously increase efficiency and reduce cost oveBecause renewables do not require fuel and because they are based on technologies that benefit from both advancement and economies of scale, they are able to continuously increase efficiency and reduce cost ovebecause they are based on technologies that benefit from both advancement and economies of scale, they are able to continuously increase efficiency and reduce cost over time.

Here is where it gets interesting, because as much as the current political environment in Washington may seem increasingly unreceptive to an economy - wide cap - and - trade system or some other meaningful and sensible climate policy, there is one promising approach that could actually benefit from the national political climate.

Because «investment» that depends so heavily on taxpayer and ratepayer subsidies, that produces no real benefits to the people of Maine, that threatens the state's economy — is investment that SHOULD be driven off, with a vengeance.