The report says that tropical forests, peatlands and agriculture should be the priority in
ecosystem carbon management.
Thawing permafrost also delivers organic - rich soils to lake bottoms, where decomposition in the absence of oxygen releases additional methane.116 Extensive wildfires also release carbon that contributes to climate warming.107, 117,118 The capacity of the Yukon River Basin in Alaska and adjacent Canada to store carbon has been substantially weakened since the 1960s by the combination of warming and thawing of permafrost and by increased wildfire.119 Expansion of tall shrubs and trees into tundra makes the surface darker and rougher, increasing absorption of the sun's energy and further contributing to warming.120 This warming is likely stronger than the potential cooling effects of increased carbon dioxide uptake associated with tree and shrub expansion.121 The shorter snow - covered seasons in Alaska further increase energy absorption by the land surface, an effect only slightly offset by the reduced energy absorption of highly reflective post-fire snow - covered landscapes.121 This spectrum of changes in Alaskan and other high - latitude terrestrial ecosystems jeopardizes efforts by society to use
ecosystem carbon management to offset fossil fuel emissions.94, 95,96
Not exact matches
Agroforestry and other techniques for better environmental
management of such agriculture remain rare, despite their proven ability to help balance increased food production with
ecosystem services like
carbon sequestration.
«We advocate complementing any
carbon - based
management approaches with other incentive schemes such as payment for
ecosystem service programmes.»
Setting Priorities: The transition to «climate smart» land
management practices, including for example low - emissions agriculture, agroforestry and the restoration of high
carbon - value
ecosystems, such as forests and peatlands, will require sectoral coordination and investments in integrated land use planning.
The Blue
Carbon Initiative partners, as well as many other organizations around the world, are working on conservation science, policy and
management of blue
carbon ecosystems globally.
Major objectives include national - level accounting of
carbon stocks and emissions from blue
carbon ecosystems, increased
management effectiveness of blue
carbon ecosystems within protected areas, and the development of blue
carbon offsets for tourism activities.
Understanding the potential consequences of rising ocean
carbon levels and related ocean changes for marine life and
ecosystems is a high priority for the ocean research community and marine resource
management.
Soil
carbon lost from Mollisols of the North Central U.S.A. with 20 years of agricultural best
management practices, Gregg R. Sanford et al., Agriculture,
Ecosystems and Environment, v162, pp 68 et seq..
Superior results in terms of range
ecosystem improvement, productivity, soil
carbon and fertility, water holding capacity and profitability have been regularly obtained by ranchers using multiple paddocks per herd with short periods of grazing, long recovery periods and adaptively changing recovery periods and other
management elements as conditions change [4,5].
Fourteen percent of corporations reporting emissions data to CDP engage in
carbon - inclusive
carbon management, according to recent
Ecosystem Marketplace research.
Combining the numbers from
Ecosystem Marketplace's latest Forest
Carbon Markets report, which identifies 168 conservation projects under
carbon management that protects over 25 million hectares of forest, with the business sector's rising interest in REDD and other forest
carbon initiatives indicate incentives - based schemes for conservation are working.
Changes in
carbon stocks and
ecosystem function linked to anthropogenic activities such as land - use change and land
management determine emissions and removals of GHG that are reported by countries for the IPCC Land Use, Land - Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) categories.
Many negotiators tell
Ecosystem Marketplace that REDD itself is no longer a contentious issue, but that things get hairy when they try to digest the decision made in Bali to expand the land - use debate from REDD alone into broader issues of «conservation, sustainable
management of forests, changes in forest cover and associated
carbon stocks and greenhouse gas emissions and the enhancement of forest
carbon stocks to enhance action on mitigation of climate change and to the consideration of reference levels.»
Looking forward, things to watch include: the impact of economic recovery on commodity prices and agricultural expansion for food and biofuels production; large - scale land acquisition by foreign nations and corporations in tropical countries; climate negotiations and the REDD mechanism, including controversies over land rights, «offsetting», forest definitions, and sustainable forest
management; the emergence of payments for
ecosystem services beyond REDD; the cap - and - trade versus
carbon tax schemes; efforts to address the demand side of deforestation — notably consumption; emerging certification systems for agricultural and forestry products (i.e. RSPO, Aliança da Terra, FSC, etc); and Brazil's progress in meeting its deforestation reduction targets.
In recent years, markets and payments for
ecosystem services (PES), such as
carbon sequestration, watershed protection and biodiversity conservation, have emerged in several African nations as a viable method for maintaining
ecosystems and rewarding responsible environmental
management.
Also included was the need to enhance local and regional
management practices to identify and reduce the primary drivers of high -
carbon coastal system degradation, as well as the requirement to enhance international recognition of coastal
carbon ecosystems.
This refers to that part of the framework convention itself that recognizes «common but differentiated» responsibilities between rich and poor countries, and also the need to promote the sustainable
management of natural
carbon sinks, including «biomass, forests and oceans as well as other terrestrial, coastal and marine
ecosystems.»
According to Mr. Heikki Simola Finnish Association for Nature Conservation Finnish forest
management has made Finnish forest and mire
ecosystems as a considerable net source of
carbon into the atmosphere for decades.
Land
management and maintenance of the biodiversity and ecosystems through programs including Working on Country and the development of Indigenous Management Agreements, as well as carbon abatement through fire management, and carbon sequestration may all be opportunities available to Indigenous la
management and maintenance of the biodiversity and
ecosystems through programs including Working on Country and the development of Indigenous
Management Agreements, as well as carbon abatement through fire management, and carbon sequestration may all be opportunities available to Indigenous la
Management Agreements, as well as
carbon abatement through fire
management, and carbon sequestration may all be opportunities available to Indigenous la
management, and
carbon sequestration may all be opportunities available to Indigenous land owners.