Sentences with phrase «editor of the journal climate»

Thirteen scientists whom they cited issued a rebuttal and several editors of the journal Climate Research resigned because of the «flawed peer review».

Mike Hulme is Professor of Climate and Culture at King's College, London, editor of the journal Climate Change, former senior researcher at the Climatic Research Unit and Professor of Climate Change at the University of East Anglia... but he's anti-science because Michael Mann says so.

He is on the Editorial Board of Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, is an Editor of Climate of the Past, and a review editor of the journal Climate Research.

In one case this actually led to the resignation of the editor of the journal Climate Research...

Pretty funny to hear the Population Bomb huckster dismiss as «hacks and has - beens» two (real) Nobel Laureates, the former President of the Royal Statistical Society, the former President of the Statistical Society of Canada, the former President of the Royal Meteorological Society, the former President of the New Zealand Association of Scientists, the founder of the Lamont - Doherty Tree - Ring Laboratory, the inventor of the Gaia hypothesis, the inventor of the argon ion laser, the proponent of the Mobile Polar High, the founding editor of the journal Climate Change, the chief scientist of the UK Met Office, the principal investigator for the National Centre for Atmospheric Research, the man who developed the first satellite temperature record, etc..

Not exact matches

The journal idea was brought to Copernicus» attention and was taken rather critically in the beginning, since the designated Editors - in - Chief were mentioned in the context of the debates of climate skeptics.

The editor - in - chief of the journal Remote Sensing has resigned over the publication of a paper questioning the reliability of climate models.

He is a leader at the renowned Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, PIK; an Adjunct Scientist at Columbia University in New York; the Lead Author of the latest IPCC chapter on Sea Level Change; journal editor, and more.

He is a Chevalier (Knight) in the French National Order of the Legion of Honour and serves as Editor - in - Chief of the journal, Climate Research.

In some cases, reviewers and / or editors supportive of mainstream views totally block important papers from being published; McKitrick, McIntyre and Herman had to completely rewrite their recent paper — showing that high tropical tropospheric temperature trends for the last three decades produced by climate models are inconsistent with observations — as a study of applying statistical methods developed in econometrics, and submit it to a journal with a more open - minded editor, in order to get it published at all.

I've become convinced that many of the editors of the high impact journals are inclined to cast opinion pieces as salvos in the ongoing war between climate change believers and skeptics.

ES&T asked Regalado and his immediate editor to respond on - the - record to the criticisms of the story and the paper s coverage of climate - change science, and were directed to set up an interview through Dow Jones & Co., the owner of the Wall Street Journal.

And keep in mind that these are arguments that certain editors of certain high - ranking climate journals found persuasive.

He is now a lead author for the upcoming IPCC report... Marika Holland, another editor at the Journal of Climate, contributed to two chapters of the 2007 climate bible... Editor Andrew Pitman was an IPCC lead author, a contributing author, and an expert reviewer for the 2007 ededitor at the Journal of Climate, contributed to two chapters of the 2007 climate bible... Editor Andrew Pitman was an IPCC lead author, a contributing author, and an expert reviewer for the 2007 eClimate, contributed to two chapters of the 2007 climate bible... Editor Andrew Pitman was an IPCC lead author, a contributing author, and an expert reviewer for the 2007 eclimate bible... Editor Andrew Pitman was an IPCC lead author, a contributing author, and an expert reviewer for the 2007 edEditor Andrew Pitman was an IPCC lead author, a contributing author, and an expert reviewer for the 2007 edition.

He is also a receiving editor for the journal New Astronomy and has testified before Congress on the issue of climate change.

He is a co-founder of the Urban Climate Change Research Network (UCCRN), co-editor of Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability, and founding editor of the Journal of Extreme Events.

He is Editor of the journal Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law (RECIEL), Associate Editor of the Carbon & Climate Law Review (CCLR), and sits on the Editorial Board of International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

In 2011, the editors at the journal Nature recommended Nisbet's research as «essential reading for anyone with a passing interest in the climate change debate,» and the New Republic highlighted his work as a «fascinating dissection of the shortcomings of climate activism.»

Recognizing that peer review procedures at some academic journals has been misused to block the publication of research that is contrary to the views of editors or influential figures in the climate science establishment, with the Editor's approval, consideration will be given to including material from non-peer-reviewed sources when credible and important scientific findings not available elsewhere.

«The special issue of the International Journal of Global Warming focuses on a crucial topic: «Loss and damage» which refers to adverse effects of climate variability and climate change that occur despite mitigation and adaptation efforts,» Editor - in - Chief Ibrahim Dincer of the University of Ontario Institute of Technology says.

Most recently, Dr. Cohen was appointed Associate Editor of the Journal of Climate, a peer - reviewed publication of the AMS.

In addition, the e-mails showed they collaborated to persecute and have fired an editor of a prominent climate science journal who allowed articles questioning the extent of humanity's role in global warming to be published.

Dr Fiona Godlee Editor - in - chief, British Medical Journal Dr. Richard Horton Editor - in - Chief, The Lancet Professor Ian Roberts Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health Professor Hugh Montgomery Professor of Intensive Care Medicine Professor Anthony Costello Professor of International Child Health Rachel Stancliffe Director, Centre for Sustainable Healthcare Dr. Robin Stott Co-chair, Climate and Health Council Maya Tickell - Painter Director, Medsin Healthy Planet Campaign

He is Editor of the journal Environmental Communication; founding Editor - in - Chief of the Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication, and a consulting science communication researcher to the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

First, there was a conspicuous rise in the number of climate change publications in the 2 years following IPCC 2007, which likely reflects the rise in popularity (among public and funding agencies) for this field of research and the increased appetite among journal editors to publish these articles.

Climate change skeptics claimed the IPCC 2007 report — the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global wClimate change skeptics claimed the IPCC 2007 report — the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global wClimate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global wclimate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global warming.

For 10 years he was an editor of the Climate Research journal.

Comment: This is the infamous case that lead to the resignation of multiple editors of the Climate Research journal in protest over a flawed peer review process that allowed publication of the paper.

The paper was approved by four reviewers and one of the journal's ten review editors, Chris de Freitas, but received a hostile reception from the climate science community, as is reflected in the CRU emails.

When Climate Research published a paper dissenting from the Jones - Mann «consensus,» Jones demanded that the journal «rid itself of this troublesome editor,» and Mann advised that «we have to stop considering Climate Research as a legitimate peer - reviewed journal.

Far from being isolated incidents, at last count we have identified 7 editors of several journals who have been subject to such bullying tactics across two disciplines; viz. climate science and psychology.

Did one of those politically motivated sympathizers who have insinuated themselves as editors of all the major climate journals reject it, despite favorable reviews?

A former editor of an enlightened environmental journal said we need a committee of scientists from the many disciplines involved in climate science.

Actually, it was more like a string of guest columns and long letters to the editor since it is hard for skeptical scientists to get published in the cabal of climate journals now -LSB-...]

But this report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change did not satisfy the editors of the Wall Street Journal, who called for delay in acting upon this science.

The Wall Street Journal editors focus on an overestimation of surface warming in the past 15 years, neglecting to discuss other impacts and time periods where models significantly underestimated the effects of climate change.

Public Library of Science (screencapture):... In 1993, the editor of the widely read medical journal The Lancet asked Paul to organize a series of articles on the impact of climate change on health.

The ultimate climate question can be morphed into various forms, but it is now public, out of the hands of climatologists, scientists, philosophers, academics and journal editors.

There have also been concerted attempts (along with members of the UK Climate Research Unit) to discredit the editors of journals who published skeptical articles or who publically questioned the hockey stick.

While the issue has only recently become acute, it has become acute because of accumulating failure during the AR5 assessment process, including errors and misrepresentations by IPCC in the assessments sent out for external review; the almost total failure of the academic climate community to address the discrepancy; gatekeeping by fellow - traveling journal editors that suppressed criticism of the defects in the limited academic literature on the topic.

This week, three editors of Climate Research resigned in protest over the journal's handling of the review process that approved the study; among them is Hans von Storch, the journal's recently appointed editor in chief.

«They submitted a flawed paper,» said Hans von Storch, editor - in - chief of the journal, Climate Research.

But according to my new analysis [PDF] of the papers published in Climate Research, there is a very clear gap in credibility during the years 1997 - 2003 when Chris de Freitas served as one of the journal's editors.

The editor - in - chief of a climate science journal has resigned in response to an academic controversy triggered by his publication of a paper co-authored by a leading climate sceptic.

You would not expect editors of such a journal to have much expertise about climate.

It is well known that there have been some glitches in the peer review: a paper by Soon and Baliunas (2003) caused the resignation of several editors from the journal Climate Research (Kinne 2003), and Wagner (Wagner et al. 2011) resigned from the editorship of Remote Sensing over the publication of a paper by Spencer and Braswell (2010).

2 April: SMH: Peter Hannam: «Conspiracist» climate change study withdrawn amid legal threats Climate change academics say the decision by a publisher to retract their paper examining the links between conspiracy theorists and denial of global warming because of legal threats could have a «chilling effect» on research... «Sadly, it has turned into a routine for outsiders with no scientific standing to approach, bully, or intimidate journals, editors, and academics,» said Professor Lewandowsky, now at the UK's University of Bclimate change study withdrawn amid legal threats Climate change academics say the decision by a publisher to retract their paper examining the links between conspiracy theorists and denial of global warming because of legal threats could have a «chilling effect» on research... «Sadly, it has turned into a routine for outsiders with no scientific standing to approach, bully, or intimidate journals, editors, and academics,» said Professor Lewandowsky, now at the UK's University of BClimate change academics say the decision by a publisher to retract their paper examining the links between conspiracy theorists and denial of global warming because of legal threats could have a «chilling effect» on research... «Sadly, it has turned into a routine for outsiders with no scientific standing to approach, bully, or intimidate journals, editors, and academics,» said Professor Lewandowsky, now at the UK's University of Bristol.

Some of Michaels's papers were published in Climate Research journal around the time that climate skeptic Chris de Freitas was serving as one of the journal's eClimate Research journal around the time that climate skeptic Chris de Freitas was serving as one of the journal's eclimate skeptic Chris de Freitas was serving as one of the journal's editors.

They had friendly editors like IPCC lead author Andrew Weaver, editor of the Journal of Climate.

from the article: «the politically charged rhetoric has contaminated academic climate research and the institutions that support climate research, so that individuals and institutions have become advocates; scientists with a perspective that is not consistent with the consensus are at best marginalized (difficult to obtain funding and get papers published by «gatekeeping» journal editors) or at worst ostracized by labels of «denier» or «heretic.