Sentences with phrase «editor review if»

Please take a look at the site herpes people meet editor review if you want to read further details on the site, the main sites reviewed, the latest novelties, interesting news or for learning how to become a member on one of these sites.

Not exact matches

In the National Review, editor Charles C.W. Cooke wrote, «If Colorado or Oregon want to legalize weed while Mississippi and Utah ban it, that's fine.

Richard Martin, senior editor for energy at MIT Technology review, called the plan «bonkers» and that «the idea of combining solar power with automaking is a bit like Ford buying ExxonMobil — if both were losing hundreds of millions a year.»

• If reading (or writing) history is your pleasure, you might want to get to know Elias Crim, editor of a new bimonthly review called The Armchair Historian.

The process for review itself is so intense that if it was biased, it would be rejected before it even reached the journal editors.

Times / Review Executive Editor Grant Parpan, who moderated the one - hour debate, asked the candidates if the district's legislator should be a member of the Shelter Island Ferry Study Group, a committee Mr. Romaine opted out of.

«But if you feel you can't give a fair review because you are in direct competition with that team,... it's important that you reveal» the conflict to the editor and decide together whether to go ahead with the review, Anderson says.

Yet for some reason the Physical Review editors omitted the Oppenheimer - Snyder paper from their list, verifying that no such list is ever complete, even if you have dozens of items instead of only 10.

Moreover, if editors and reviewers for peer - reviewed journals notice similarities between a submitted manuscript and work already posted on arXiv, they can point the authors to the preprint and ask them to discuss and cite it.

Editors may have papers under review that rely on a published result; if it's being called into question, editors need to know about it, hEditors may have papers under review that rely on a published result; if it's being called into question, editors need to know about it, heditors need to know about it, he adds.

Remaining an associate editor is directly linked to performance, if we get reviews done in a timely way, and interact positively with authors so they are not calling the editor to yell at him, we keep our positions.

If you can not judge a paper impartially, you should not accept it for review or you should notify the editor as soon as you appreciate the situation.

If events will prevent a timely review, it is your responsibility to inform the editor at the time of the request.

If the reviews make personal comments or accusations of unoriginality... I challenge the editor to ask the reviewer for the relevant citations or clarification.

If a review addressed any of the paper's serious scientific problems, I sent the editor a «revised» version that was superficially improved — a few more photos of lichens, fancier formatting, extra details on methodology — but without changing any of the fatal scientific flaws.

«We think that this set gives readers a sense of the kind of new physics that would be required to explain the data, if confirmed,» wrote Robert Garisto, editor of Physical Review Letters (PRL), which published the four papers on 12 April, in an accompanying editorial.

If you are interested in writing a book review, or if you have an article you think we should print, please contact Annette Aguayo, Editor, at [phone] or [email protected]If you are interested in writing a book review, or if you have an article you think we should print, please contact Annette Aguayo, Editor, at [phone] or [email protected]if you have an article you think we should print, please contact Annette Aguayo, Editor, at [phone] or [email protected].

Despite what Joe Bast and Heartland comms director Jim Lakely claim, their false report is not peer - reviewed, a formal process conducted by editors at actual scientific journals have other qualified scientists rigorously review and critique submitted work if it is to be approved for publication.

If the action editors are suitably qualified, they ought to be able to identify suitable reviewers for themselves, and suggesting reviewers is likely to lead to friendly review of weak papers by reviewers that also suffer from the same misunderstandings.

Editor review: If there are enough gay sugar daddy apps to review I wouldn't think about the normal sugar daddy app like SeekingArrangements, but they have famous reputation and buzz for a long time.

Editor's Review: Actually when I see the homepage I think it may express the new users a message which is «privacy», if you are a rich sugar daddy and want an affair or sweet relationship with a male sugar baby in private, you'll feel safe here.

If you are making the site different from others, just check the reviews by editor.

The short answer to this question is actually pretty simple — yes, you need to read a comprehensive Positive Singles Editor Review so that you can find out if this particular dating site can cater to your own specific needs.

If you one the them who are on the lookout for the most appropriate one, you can take a look at our top senior dating websites list here, it includes comprehensive editor's reviews and compares of the top 10 senior dating sites on the web, which will give you the great chance at finding love.

If this is your first time to visit our website ： First, read our editor and reviews of few / all bisexual dating sites, compare the feature lists, costs and active members; Secondly, choose the best one that suits for you and create your dating profile; Then, come back to our website and re-pick one if you do n`t have any lucIf this is your first time to visit our website ： First, read our editor and reviews of few / all bisexual dating sites, compare the feature lists, costs and active members; Secondly, choose the best one that suits for you and create your dating profile; Then, come back to our website and re-pick one if you do n`t have any lucif you do n`t have any luck.

Read the detail of our top editor ranking & rating site - bi cupid review and bi people meet review and see if you can find your needs online.

After all, if you have never registered on a site where herpes people meet editor review can provide important clarifications.

It is not clear whether women chose to write reviews of films with women directors and writers or if editors assigned these films to women writers.

It is unclear whether women chose to review romantic comedies and dramas or if editors were more likely to assign films with romantic themes to women writers.

Editor's note: This review goes into some small spoiler territory with the identity of bosses and details on locations in The Old Hunters - so if you want go into From Software's expansion with fresh eyes, be warned.

[Editor's Note: We've reviewed this film previously and at greater length on Blu - ray — click here to read that if you're interested.]

If the editors think that this is the only errata, they most definitely need to review this bilge and reexamine every word, including «and» and «the.»

ASSOCIATE EDITOR GRAHAM KOZAK: If you've been paying attention to these review notes, you're undoubtedly aware that there's never been a better time to be in the market for a new compact sedan.

In fact, our very own assistant editor has picked the Honda City for himself and he is one happy guy but like we said in our first review of the car, if you are buying a City, it has to be powered by the i - VTEC petrol engine and our team mate did the same.

Editor's note: This review looks at the outgoing 2016 Honda CR - V; if you're looking for details on the redesigned 2017 CR - V, we've got them here.

«The trick is that if you have an author that is struggling to find that audience, to find that readership — Alan [Russell] is a perfect example, because he always got wonderful reviews, is a fantastic writer, still has a great relationship with his former editor at St. Martins, but there was always a struggle to find that readership.

At Chanticleer Book Reviews, if your work is not well - received, our editors will write an «evaluation» that addresses the major issues and problems found so that the writer may work on improving the quality of the work in question.

Unlike in the other sections of Booklist, reference titles not recommended for purchase may still be reviewed if the editor feels it is important to place such works in the context of similar sources in the field.

If they go forward, we post the review on our website, send it to many other venues, and consider it for publication in our monthly newsletter read by librarians, agents and editors and our column in Booklist magazine, which reaches 65,000 librarians.

Peer review, critique groups, freelance book doctors, etc., can all help if you're lucky enough to find the right people, but I don't think there's any substitute for what an in - house editor with a vested interest in your project can bring to the table.

Together you and your editor will determine if a second editing pass or partial second pass to review your revisions would be a good idea.

If new text was incorporated as part of your revision process, your editor will review this updated material during the second round.

If this is your first time writing sales copy, find a copywriter or an experienced editor and ask them to review it and offer you suggestions for improvement.

If new text was incorporated as part of your revision process, your editor will also review this updated material during the second round.

You are not required to provide acknowledgement for the editing in your published work but if you'd like to, you would include the Editor's name and not «Portland Book Review.»

-LSB-...] the other day, the «editorial review» isn't quite what it sounds like. Or, as Jackie Kessler puts it (if you're drinking something, put it down): AUTHORS: Our books will get Harlequin editors working on them to help us become stronger -LSB-...]

If you missed Chad's wonderful guest post about how editors review and acquire proposals, then hop back there for some great insight.

Books that received great reviews from editors, but as you say, were to cutting edge to find their way onto the very limited genre / shelf space of traditional publishing, can now see the light of day and find their readership, even if it IS only a small readership, they can and will be read, and THAT is refreshing.

Simply submit your manuscript, and if it meets our submission guidelines an editor and marketing specialist will review it for free.

I review works of fiction primarily but will consider non-fiction works if they are on a book - related topic (for example, about an author, editor or publisher).