Sentences with phrase «editorial review process»

Articles are accepted on a continual basis and each article goes through a structured editorial review process for content and clarity.

1 In this article, current and former editors of bioscience journals comment on the editorial review process, describe how editors and reviewers are chosen, and offer concrete suggestions on how to get involved in editorial review.

Articles are accepted on a continual basis and each article goes through a structured editorial review process for content and clarity.

Not exact matches

Led by Steve Coll, the dean of the Columbia Journalism School, the review examined the editorial process behind the explosive story, which failed to hold up under a barrage of questions raised by other media after its publication in November.

Amazon Editorial reviews Product Description How China's ascendance as an economic superpower will alter the cultural, political, social, and ethnic balance of global power in the twenty - first century, unseating the West and in the process creating a whole new world...

The peer - reviewed social science journal that published the study, along with commentary alongside it, commissions a member of its own editorial board (who has an openly hostile view of the study) to «audit» the peer - review process.

As part of the pre-publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by two peers (an editor and referee who is external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

As part of the pre-publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by four peers (an editor and three referees who are external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

As part of the prepublication editorial process, this review has been commented on by two peers (an editor and referee who is external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

Mann says his complaint was that the peer - review process had been distorted to allow «extremely poor papers» to be published and points out that the journal's editor - in - chief and half the editorial board had resigned in protest.

However, as an editor I am surrounded by the latest scientific breakthroughs in many areas, and there is a tremendous feeling of satisfaction in nurturing a paper from a study that has some weaknesses to one which gains strength through the review and editorial process.

► «Last month, BioMed Central, an open - access publisher, announced that in 2015 it will launch the journal Research Involvement and Engagement, which will closely collaborate with patients in all aspects of its editorial processes, including peer review,» Dalmeet Singh Chawla wrote on Wednesday.

The process of review is dependent upon the editorial structure of a given journal.

Only a small fraction of the publication costs of a print journalsome estimate as little as 10 percentcovers the editorial and peer review process.

Last month, BioMed Central, an open - access publisher, announced that in 2015 it will launch the journal Research Involvement and Engagement, which will closely collaborate with patients in all aspects of its editorial processes, including peer review.

Research Involvement and Engagement is not the only journal that is embedding patient peer review into its editorial processes.

«The transparent peer review process will encourage constructive feedback from experts,» the Wellcome Trust's press release reads,» [focusing] on helping the authors improve their work rather than on making an editorial decision to accept or reject an article.»

Calcagno speculates that this is the effect of the review and editorial process.

Or a People editorial about Jimmy Kimmel that could only be published following a rigorous review process by experts in the field of Jimmy Kimmel.

Editors - in - chief or handling editors with the assistance of editorial board have complete responsibilities for the peer - review process, decisions, and selection of articles.

Specifically, during the peer - review process, each submission will be reviewed by experts with relevant expertise, ensuring fair and objective decision - making, which will be guaranteed by experts sitting on the Editorial Board.

The editorial includes a list of «actions we have taken to prevent citation stacking from recurring and to further strengthen the transparency of the review process» — including monitoring editors and showing authors how to report suspicious conduct.

Simplified and streamlined processes for submitting manuscripts through Editorial Manager, faster peer - review, a shareable link to accepted articles, and increased publishing opportunities through our new Open Access option in the Journal of the Endocrine Society (JES).

There is no third - party editing process by a recognized and respected media brand (which would include fact checking and a professional editorial review).

Some of his editorial notes had me in stitches laughing, which made the whole review process that much more bearable.

Please review our Editorial Services FAQ for more information on the scope and process of our editing services.

Unless an author purchases BookBaby editing services, BookBaby does not provide editorial services as part of the file review process for book printing or eBook distribution orders.

In the event that we accept your essay for publication, it will go through a careful editorial process, and you will have plenty of opportunities to review it carefully.

Such factors as the work itself, the breadth of its marketing, the extent of its distribution, the editorial process, its sales, the author's personal history, reviews in recognized publications, and any other factor relevant to the particular situation may be considered in making such determination [of eligibility].

Filed Under: Insurance Tagged With: Application Process, Insurance, Life Insurance, Life Insurance Application, Life Insurance Quote Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, or other advertiser and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Submission Process and Deadlines Papers will be reviewed using the JAVTE double - blind peer - review process and should be prepared using the JAVTE author guidelines (see Editorial Policies and Peer Review PrProcess and Deadlines Papers will be reviewed using the JAVTE double - blind peer - review process and should be prepared using the JAVTE author guidelines (see Editorial Policies and Peer Review Proreview process and should be prepared using the JAVTE author guidelines (see Editorial Policies and Peer Review Prprocess and should be prepared using the JAVTE author guidelines (see Editorial Policies and Peer Review ProReview ProcessProcess).

While most of our voting outlets already have access to games through the normal editorial process, publishers and developers are permitted to provide review copies or digital redemption codes to the outlets.

Some questions are going to be raised about the peer review and editorial process here... — gavin]

Furthermore, they «did not find any evidence of behaviour that might undermine the conclusions of the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] assessments» and, the report states, there was «no evidence to substantiate» allegations of perversion of the peer review or editorial process.

However, it is not foolproof — a deeply flawed paper can end up being published under a number of different potential circumstances: (i) the work is submitted to a journal outside the relevant field (e.g. a paper on paleoclimate submitted to a social science journal) where the reviewers are likely to be chosen from a pool of individuals lacking the expertise to properly review the paper, (ii) too few or too unqualified a set of reviewers are chosen by the editor, (iii) the reviewers or editor (or both) have agendas, and overlook flaws that invalidate the paper's conclusions, and (iv) the journal may process and publish so many papers that individual manuscripts occasionally do not get the editorial attention they deserve.

On the allegations that there was subversion of the peer review or editorial process we find no evidence to substantiate this in the three instances examined in detail.

Our main concern is that industry - funded groups and law firms are seeking to criminalize the peer review process by obtaining internal editorial comments of reviewers as a means to impeach or impugn scientists.

By publishing papers that are not peer reviewed, EGU journals such as ACPD are contributing to the noise of science, when the role of the editorial process should be to help readers find the rare nuggets of important high quality signal amid the abundance of excess noise.

A wide array of science journals, from Science and Nature to the New England Journal of Medicine, have a long history of taking strong editorial positions while maintaining (as much as possible) the integrity of the peer review and publishing process.

The «research» turned out by Exxon shills is either not peer - reviewed at all or pushed through a corrupted peer review process (most of the editorial board of one journal resigned over one of the cases, and now the stuff has to appear in the denialist house journal E&E).

And the review and editorial process of all the competing science journals are equally tainted?

So with the understanding that I sure as hell know what pervasive influence peddling can do to the process of peer review — because the pharma companies do actively recruit their «key opinion leaders» on the basis of things like editorial clout and that prominence within their specialty which gives them to hold responsibilities in peer review for «high impact» medical journals — you might appreciate why, when I got to read those e-mails in the FOI2009.zip archive last November, my immediate desire was for something brutally Sicilian to happen immediately and with spatter marks on the surrounding walls to the C.R.U. correspondents who had been concerting to infest and pervert the peer review process throughout the physical sciences wherever anything critical of the AGW hypothesis might be brought into publication.

That leaves only one possibility — that the peer - review process at Climate Research has been hijacked by a few skeptics on the editorial board.

Starting in October 2002, in this final - stage editorial review and clearance process, it came to my attention that CEQ Chief of Staff Philip Cooney was extensively marking up reports in a manner that had the cumulative effect of adding an enhanced sense of scientific uncertainty about global warming and minimizing its likely consequences, while also deleting even minor references to the National Assessment.

Complaints about a mistaken reference to shrinking Himalayan glaciers in the Nobel Prize - winning 2007 reports triggered a painful review of editorial processes for these latest reports, Pachauri noted in his speech.

It was repeatedly asserted that E&E does not conduct peer review and — being on the Editorial Board of that journal — I corrected the matter and gave a brief explanation of E&E's peer review process.

Half of the editorial board of Climate Research resigned in protest against what they felt was a failure of the peer review process.

3) Both seek to further their case in the courts, on editorial pages and in the political process rather than in the peer - reviewed literature.

Regarding curatorial and editorial contributions, any number of innovative structures might provide great improvements over the deeply flawed and inconsistent process of peer review and its associated processes that we currently rely on publishers to facilitate.

The process is a «blind» review; the Editorial Board is unaware who wrote the submission.