However, a theological school understood on the Berlin model would necessarily be defined by the goal of
educating church leadership.
The first is that it is disastrous to define theological schooling as the task of
educating church leadership because it distorts and finally destroys theology.
The conventional view that a theological school is «theological» because
it educates church leadership has been roundly attacked in the current conversation about theological education.
However, unlike most theological schools on either model, the school sketched in this proposal is not defined as a «theological» school by a goal to
educate church leadership.
Not exact matches
But one thing I hope the
church will do, and maybe Mitch can help with this, is
educate local
leadership.
Conventional wisdom assumes that the defining goal of a theological school is to
educate clergy for the
churches, or, more broadly, to
educate leadership for the
churches (whether it is lay or ordained
leadership is probably irrelevant).
Nobody at all has denied that theological schooling can
educate people for
church leadership; nor has anybody denied that
church leaders should undergo theological schooling.
It is as though the
church's ministry is meant only for the elite and thus for those
educated for future
leadership, not at all for those who study for immediate employability.
The first thing that
churches need to do is have their
leadership educate themselves on the growing number of SAHDs and realize that we are probably already attending their
churches.
As a graduate school of the
church, the primary task of a theological seminary is to provide
educated leadership for the
church in fulfilling this mission.
Theological education is theological because it
educates professional
church leadership through schooling in historical and, above all, philosophical Wissenschaft.
The character of theological education follows from the nature of professional
church leadership as «practical theology» since the unifying goal of theological schooling is to
educate such
leadership.
Accepting the conventions of the «Berlin» type, it grounds the unity of education in its overarching goal of
educating professional
church leadership for the
churches.
My proposal has been that precisely because a theological school is not defined by the goal of
educating church leaders it may, as a matter of contingent fact, prepare its students very well for
leadership in congregations.