In the first study of opinions handed down in
education adequacy litigation between January 2005 and January 2008, this paper shows a marked shift away from outcomes favorable to adequacy plaintiffs.
Not exact matches
«
Adequacy litigation was devised as a strategy to reform public
education.»
It discusses an important trend in
education litigation: the increasing reliance on theories of
adequacy to achieve high - quality
education for all students.
However, there is a deeper and more sinister dynamic at play in modern
education - finance
adequacy research and
litigation.
To avoid this outcome, a new wave of school - finance
litigation has instead endorsed an «
adequacy» claim based on state constitutional clauses that exhort the legislature to provide for a «thorough and efficient» (or similar language) system of
education.
Nonetheless, Schrag concludes from far less reliable sources that the additional money that
adequacy litigation brings will help public
education.
Following two decades in which courts spurred significant reforms in our nation's neediest schools by interpreting the
education clauses of their state constitutions to guarantee an «adequate»
education for all students, the years 2005 to 2008 have seen a dramatic change in the judicial response to
adequacy litigation.