Sentences with phrase «education litigation»

«Failure to Identify» is a common issue in special education litigation.

But this does not mean that the volume or importance of education litigation will decline.

In CFE v. New York, another state with a spare education clause, Judge De Grasse without apology explained that in education litigation courts «are called on to give content to Education Clauses that are composed of terse generalities,» which in New York's case is «The legislature shall provide for the maintenance and support of a system of free common schools, wherein all the children of this state may be educated.»

This case represents a fascinating, and potentially pivotal, moment in the history of education litigation based on education rights and equal protection rights in state constitutions.

Supporters of education litigation contend that the courts are essential to secure student (and civil) rights, while critics insist that the courts distort policy and that the mere threat of litigation undermines the authority of teachers and administrators.

It is also a high - frequency area of special education litigation between parents and schools, in part due to the uniqueness of each ASD diagnosis and the complexity of each resulting IEP.

In particular, Gooley helps defend colleges and universities, as well as secondary schools, in an array of employment and education litigation matters.

about NSBA and CSBA Urge Court to Use Fairness Principles in Awarding Attorneys» Fees in Special Education Litigation

It discusses an important trend in education litigation: the increasing reliance on theories of adequacy to achieve high - quality education for all students.

E4E - Los Angeles Teacher Action Team member Phylis Hoffman discusses the history of education litigation in California and the opportunity the recent Vergara...

Yet it is equally clear that education litigation has often failed to achieve its goals.

Due Process Hearings and Special Education Litigation (Expert Witness Testimony and Representation)

But hiring more lawyers to run up the cost of special education litigation and making it more difficult for parents to pursue meritorious claims seems like a backhanded way to reduce costs.