In fact, our next President will be forced to make a number of important
education policy decisions almost immediately upon taking office.
Not exact matches
But policymakers, pundits, and others suffering from PLDD who control our increasingly centralized
education system focus
almost exclusively on economic utility as the criteria for making
education policy decisions.
In its analysis of the eleven waiver applications, the Center on
Education Policy found that nine state applicants will base
almost all accountability
decisions on the achievement of only two students groups; i.e., all students and a «disadvantaged» student group or «super subgroup.»
These included a strong vision of and value for public
education in which
almost Finnish children participate as the creator of Finland's future society; resulting high status for the country's teaching profession whose members are stringently selected through rigorous university - based teacher
education programs that confer Masters degrees on all of them; a widespread culture of collaboration in curriculum development among teachers in each school district; an equally robust culture of collaboration among all partners in strong local municipalities where most curriculum and other
policy decisions are made; and a system of widespread cooperation and trust instead of US - style test - based accountability.