But that's not how the new year is shaping up for Connecticut parents, who are in jeopardy of losing what little power they currently have in the state's public schools — thanks to the state's 2012
education reform law which is beginning to take effect.
Not exact matches
She also authored and passed the landmark 2010
Education Reform Law,
which was instrumental in delivering $ 700 million in federal «Race to the Top» to New York State.
The Governor's message was astutely deferential to Upstate's need for economic growth, meanwhile Cuomo also avoided triggering the tripwires of controversy on
education and the environment (
which provided Zephyr Teachout with opening to garner a third of the 2014 Democratic primary vote); Cuomo advanced strong measures around election
law reform and on the criminal justice front vis a vis Bail
reform, as well as the Dream Act and MWBE all of
which registered positively with minority voters.
In 2001, Bush persuaded Congress to pass a new
law, No Child Left Behind (NCLB),
which created the nation's first
reform - minded federal regulatory regime in
education.
The action was taken under the state's 1990 school -
reform law,
which requires the commissioner of
education to formally terminate all department employees and abolish their positions by the end of June as he overhauls the state...
But there's an argument to be made that the apogee of conservative social policy was actually in the 1990s, with tough - on - crime
laws,
which broke the back of a crack - fueled murder wave; welfare
reform,
which reined in government dependency; and
education reform,
which curbed monopoly power of the teachers» unions in our big cities.
NEA Launches NCLB
Reform Effort Many educators have expressed concerns about the requirements and sanctions of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, and the National Education Association has adopted a plan to reform the law, which it wants Congress to
Reform Effort Many educators have expressed concerns about the requirements and sanctions of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, and the National
Education Association has adopted a plan to
reform the law, which it wants Congress to
reform the
law,
which it wants Congress to hear.
Allowing students to attend schools near their parents» place of employment is particularly important when the selected school offers before - and after - school programs, concluded the 15 - member California Commission on School Governance and Management,
which was authorized under the state's 1983
education -
reform law.
«California's charter school
law has initiated a broad
reform movement consisting of parents and educators who are coming together to create new schools
which are better meeting the needs of students and encouraging improvement throughout our public
education system.
The most noted of
which was Massachusetts with its historic 1993
education reform law, nation - leading state academic standards and assessments, and the unprecedented gains on national and international testing.
See what Fox News reported on the parent's efforts and empowerment here, and also check out Editorials in L.A. area newspapers, including one calling the effort a «winning
reform» for public
education in the Los Angeles Daily News and another in the Los Angeles Times
which calls for more clarity in the
law.
Herbert Hilgado, who has worked closely with the Los Angeles - based
education reform group Parent Revolution,
which has led the effort to organize parents and help them use California's Parent Trigger
law to take over McKinley Elementary School, writes in his complaint:
In Maryland, the small cadre of reformers there (including the Old Line State branch of 50 CAN and the Center for
Education Reform) are looking to rewrite the state's charter school
law,
which favors districts at children's expense.
He describes the nation's main
education law as an «impediment to
reform,» citing ESEA's outdated testing regimen, accountability measures, and teacher quality determinations, all of
which fail to align with the widely adopted Common Core State Standards as well as recent state efforts to overhaul their teacher evaluation systems.
I faithfully read the
education blogs written by Jonathan Pelto and Diane Ravitch; I follow the writing of Wendy Lecker, senior attorney at the Education Law Center as I grapple with so much of the misguided education reform which is strangling the efforts and morale of excellent
education blogs written by Jonathan Pelto and Diane Ravitch; I follow the writing of Wendy Lecker, senior attorney at the
Education Law Center as I grapple with so much of the misguided education reform which is strangling the efforts and morale of excellent
Education Law Center as I grapple with so much of the misguided
education reform which is strangling the efforts and morale of excellent
education reform which is strangling the efforts and morale of excellent teachers.
Dropout Nation has long argued that the Obama administration's waiver gambit, as much driven by a desire to put its mark on federal
education policy (and stamp out that of predecessor George W. Bush, upon
which the administration's own
reforms have been built) as by the lack of movement within Congress on reauthorizing the
law, weakens the decade of strong
reform efforts
which the
law's accountability provisions helped usher.
A debate to modify this and other
reforms, especially the one
which granted control of the Higher
Education System by the government, was practically passed with consensus by the multi-partisan National Assembly on August 4, 2010, but vetoed by President Rafael Correa, who wanted to keep the
law strictly as it was originally redacted by his political party and SENPLADES (National Secretary of Planning and Development).
While the government hopes to save 18 billion Reais (GBP # 4.1 billion; USD$ 5.5 billion) per year with social security
reforms, they have just approved annual tax cuts of 50 billion Reais (GBP # 11.4 billion; USD$ 15.2 billion) for foreign oil companies willing to explore the pre-salt oil reserve (one of the largest in the world), the benefits of
which were to be directed, by
law, to public health and
education.
A national non profit women's organization
which promotes the equality rights of women through legal
education, research and
law reform advocacy.
How do you bring the stakeholders (Court Administrators, AG's, Tax Authorities,
Law Societies,
Law Foundations, non-profit legal agencies, the profession and rich benefactors) to the table, without an initiative or proposal
which outlines some common goals:
reform and streamline, access and sustainability, shared responsibility and accountability (legal and fiscal) and better public
education?