Not exact matches
Of course, it is true that population growth of any kind puts pressure on infrastructure, but in reality falling investment in public services
represents a political choice by the current Conservative government, which has opted to
spend the tax revenues generated by immigrants and refugees on tax cuts for businesses and reducing the deficit rather than expanding healthcare and
education provision.
From increased
education spending, to proposed new revenue generation ideas to whether legalizing marijuana is in the state's best interest, state lawmakers
representing Western New York districts offered various opinions on the details of the budget proposal revealed Tuesday by Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
«This
represents the largest cut in
education spending over any four - year period since at least the 1950s.
Sen. John Bonacic, who
represents portions of the Hudson Valley, said
education spending will likely be increased by more than $ 1 billion, a higher amount than recommended by Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
He now
represents a half - dozen interest groups, including Alliant Energy, which
spent $ 194,000 on lobbying in the 2011 - 12 legislative session; School Choice Wisconsin, which supports public
spending on private schools and has another former Assembly speaker, John Gard, on its lobby payroll; and the Wisconsin Council for Independent
Education, which
represents for - profit colleges.
Mulgrew testified with three other city labor leaders,
representing classroom aides, firefighters and health workers, who took the Bloomberg administration to task for
spending billions of dollars on the corruption - plagued payroll system City Time and the problem - plagued Special
Education Student Information System (SESIS) while failing to give needed raises to city workers.
Facing heckling from the crowd, Morgan warned teachers that they should work with the Conservative government, saying: «Teaching unions have a choice —
spend the next four years doing battle with us and doing down the profession they
represent in the process, or stepping up, seizing the opportunities and promise offered by the white paper and helping us to shape the future of the
education system.»
Seven hundred million, spread out over four years,
represented less than one - half of 1 percent of the state's
education spending, and $ 350 million for Gotham, over four years, is the same droplet.
Today's committee report states: «Unjustifiably high salaries use public money that could be better
spent on improving children's
education and supporting frontline teaching staff, and do not
represent value for money.
The U.S. Department of
Education's Institute of Education Sciences (IES) represents only a fraction of total education research, but its budget gives some perspective: IES spends about $ 200 million on research compared to more than $ 600 billion of total K — 12
Education's Institute of
Education Sciences (IES) represents only a fraction of total education research, but its budget gives some perspective: IES spends about $ 200 million on research compared to more than $ 600 billion of total K — 12
Education Sciences (IES)
represents only a fraction of total
education research, but its budget gives some perspective: IES spends about $ 200 million on research compared to more than $ 600 billion of total K — 12
education research, but its budget gives some perspective: IES
spends about $ 200 million on research compared to more than $ 600 billion of total K — 12
spending.
K - 12
education is the largest line item in most state budgets,
representing 22 percent of total state
spending and more than a third of general fund expenditures (money that comes from state taxes and is not earmarked for specific purposes).
The database reveals that the NEA, which
represents about 2.3 million K - 12 public school teachers and about one million
education support workers,
spent $ 56.3 million during the 2007 - 08 election cycle, making it the largest campaign spender in the nation.
While
education represents a fraction of that
spent on medical research, this is a massive waste if the findings do not translate into improving outcomes for learners.
If you combine the campaign
spending of all those entities it does not match the amount
spent by the National
Education Association, the public - sector labor union that represents some 2.3 million K — 12 public school teachers and nearly a million education support workers (bus drivers, custodians, food service employees), retirees, and college student
Education Association, the public - sector labor union that
represents some 2.3 million K — 12 public school teachers and nearly a million
education support workers (bus drivers, custodians, food service employees), retirees, and college student
education support workers (bus drivers, custodians, food service employees), retirees, and college student members.
Under Illinois» new funding formula, each school district receives an «adequacy target,» which
represents the amount of funding it should
spend to provide its students with a high - quality
education.
So teaching unions have a choice —
spend the next 4 years doing battle with us and doing down the profession they
represent in the process, or stepping up, seizing the opportunities and promise offered by the white paper and helping us to shape the future of the
education system.
He later pointed out that Race to the Top funding
represents less than 1 percent of total K - 12
education spending nationwide.
But the PAC said: «Unjustifiably high salaries use public money that could be better
spent on improving children's
education and supporting front - line teaching staff and do not
represent value for money.»
For most of the past decade, NCATE, the American Association for Colleges of Teacher
Education and the ed schools they
represent have
spent more time criticizing school reformers, decrying the presence of alternative outfits such as Teach For America, and defending their shoddy offerings, than on improving the quality of their teacher training.
As
Education Week's Andrew Ujifusa recently observed, the proposed 2017 - 2018 cuts represent the largest proposed reduction to federal education spending «since President Ronald Reagan sought a 35.7 percent cut to the department in his proposed 1983 budge
Education Week's Andrew Ujifusa recently observed, the proposed 2017 - 2018 cuts
represent the largest proposed reduction to federal
education spending «since President Ronald Reagan sought a 35.7 percent cut to the department in his proposed 1983 budge
education spending «since President Ronald Reagan sought a 35.7 percent cut to the department in his proposed 1983 budget.»
And AEI's Rick Hess made a smart point that the eye - popping 30 percent number being used to
represent education spending cuts in Oklahoma overstates the cuts to actual student
spending.
Labour and the Liberal Democrats said the plans
represented a «real - terms cut» and that other areas of
education spending would be squeezed.
Ms Morgan went on: «The teaching unions have a choice -
spend the next four years doing battle with us and doing down the profession they
represent in the process, or stepping up, seizing the opportunities and promise offered by the White Paper and helping us to shape the future of the
education system.»
Secretary Duncan testified before a House appropriations subcommittee to defend the Obama Administration's proposed $ 68.6 billion FY15
education budget, which
represents a $ 1.3 billion increase over FY14
spending.
The
Education Secretary, Michael Gove, later described the
spending review as
representing «a good settlement for schools.»
It must be noted that the state will
spend about $ 75 billion on
education this year, which
represents about a 60 percent increase in the last 6 years.
It has turned a relatively modest federal program (the $ 4.3 billion budget
represents less than 1 percent of all federal, state and local
education spending) into high - yield leverage that could end up overshadowing health care reform in its impact and that is already upending traditional Democratic Party politics.
So in political
spending, the National
Education Association, the biggest union in the country, doesn't come close to
representing the majority of its members.
Lindsey
spent five years as the President of the Maryland Community Association for the
Education of Young Children,
representing thousands of educators in Montgomery and Prince George's Counties in Maryland.