Wealthier schools in the state spend 80 percent more on student
education than poorer districts.
Not exact matches
Indeed, in
Education Week «s own dataset, 40 states spend more in the
poorest quartile of
districts than in the richest.
What about those states at the bottom of
Education Trust's spectrum, the ones that spend considerably less on
poor districts than on rich ones?
Part of the answer is in the question: states that spend considerably more on
poor districts than rich ones can be ranked very low by
Education Week because the McLoone Index is measuring the cost of increasing the spending on rich
districts toward that on
poor ones.
Concerned that varying
education programs are creating «two Connecticuts, one for the rich and one for the
poor,» the state's department of
education is studying whether wealthy
districts offer substantially better programs
than poorer ones.
Nevada is one of only 10 states with negative wealth - neutrality scores, meaning that, on average, property -
poor districts actually have more state and local revenue for
education than wealthy
districts do.
A study of 49 states by The
Education Trust found that school
districts with high numbers of low - income and minority students receive substantially less state and local money per pupil
than school
districts with few
poor and minority children.
But Oklahoma is one of only 10 states with negative wealth - neutrality scores, meaning that, on average, property -
poor districts actually have more state and local revenue for
education than wealthy
districts do.
The technology gap in public
education is narrowing, with one computer for every 5.3 students in America's
poorest districts — less
than half a student behind the national average.
The brainchild of President Obama's Secretary of
Education, John B. King Jr., the program had attracted interest from 26 school
districts across the country that believed kids would be better off in schools that educate rich and
poor, and white and minority students, together rather
than separately.
In a push to provide more children with free tutoring under the No Child Left Behind Act, the Department of
Education is expanding two pilot programs that allow school
districts to offer the extra assistance a year earlier
than usual, and to serve as tutoring providers even if they themselves have been deemed
poor performers.
The data is very clear, AF students are less
poor than students in the
district schools, they have less English as a second language needs, they go home to schools where English is usually the primary language and they have less special
education needs.
More
than half of Illinois state
education dollars go to
districts regardless of their wealth, shortchanging
poor districts that have students with greater needs.
All AF schools enroll fewer
poor, ELL and Special
Education students
than the
districts from which they draw.
Poorer districts couldn't fill the hole, and more
than 20,000
education jobs were lost.
However, data from the State Department of
Education reveals that about 90 percent of Connecticut's charters serve a less needy population
than their host
districts: fewer
poor children, fewer English Language Learners or fewer students with disabilities, with most having a combination of two or three of these categories.
In
district - level analysis, the
Education Trust finds that nationally
districts serving high concentrations of low - income students receive on average $ 1,200 less in state and local funding
than districts that serve low concentrations of low - income students, and that gap widens to $ 2,000 when comparing high - minority and low - minority
districts.17 These findings are further reflected by national funding equity measures reported by
Education Week, which indicate that wealthy school
districts spend more per student
than poorer school
districts do on average.18
Rubin co-authored a report in October showing that charter schools in New Jersey educate significantly smaller percentages of
poor students, special
education students and students from non-English speaking families
than the public school
districts in which they are located.
Given that the percentage of low - income suburban fourth - grade young men struggling with literacy is only seven percentage points lower
than that for big - city counterparts (and only six points lower for suburban fourth - grade young women peers
than for big - city counterparts), suburban
districts are doing as poorly as big - city counterparts in providing the
poorest kids with high - quality
education needed for success in an increasingly knowledge - based economy.
«A petition drive is a
poor way to make drastic changes within a school setting,» said Kristen Fisher, president of the Anaheim Elementary
Education Association, a union representing more
than 800 teachers in California's Anaheim City School
District.