Although I have been involved in the start - up and management of two charter schools, I think
educational reformers who are depending on them to transform public education are overselling their virtues.
An «agglomeration of foodies and
educational reformers who are propelled by a vacuous if well - meaning ideology» — in other words, by unexamined assumptions that spending time in school gardens will give children a better chance at getting an education and a high - school diploma.
The recent emergence of home education is linked to the influence of
educational reformers who published in the late 1960s and the early 1970s.
There is a story we tell at conferences about
an educational reformer who holds a seance in order to call up the ghost of John Dewey.
Not exact matches
It was an illusion of Horace Mann and the other
reformers who shaped our
educational system in conscious opposition to «sectarian» schools that a coherent «common» education could be provided by stressing only those convictions on which «men of good will» agreed.
Reformers like the eighteenth century Mary Wollstonecraft acted in a period where little progress had been made towards
educational equality, and the reality for women
who block marriage laws were essentially property rights and everything a woman owned belonged to her husband.
Like the proverbial drunk
who hunts for his keys near the lamppost, school
reformers have searched for the
educational keys to success by looking where the solutions are the easiest, not where the problems are most severe.
This is the very point we have argued against all the corporate
reformers who say that poverty is not a factor, that only incompetent and inappropriately protected teachers result in bad
educational outcomes.
If school vouchers bettered the
educational opportunities only of children
who use the vouchers to attend private schools or schools in another district, many
reformers would be left holding cups half empty.
Reformers are school district leaders
who aim to make centralized, government - run
educational systems work more effectively by imposing new rules and regulations concerning what school administrators and teachers can and can not do.
This year we are honoring Richard Strong
who, for most of his career, worked privately as a teacher of teachers,
educational reformer, and researcher.
Apparently Duncan may not have been referring to all tutoring, just the tutoring provided by the private companies, which would certainly be a bit of an embarrassment for the «education
reformers»
who claim privatizing
educational services is the key to successfully reforming America's education system.
While strong
reformers who are Republicans continue to run and win elections in states, Republicans at the national level seem not to understand that in supporting
educational choice they are supporting a civil right, and that they are the leaders in this support.
In the process, they have forgotten their moral and political obligations as school
reformers to the most - vulnerable children, the kids black and brown and poor and American Indian,
who have been subjected to nearly two centuries of what can be best called
educational genocide.
Our donors are longtime education
reformers who want nothing more than to see children receive better
educational opportunities.
Education
reformers believe that performance evaluations are the key to improving
educational achievement, and those
who fail to receive good performance evaluations should lose their jobs.
The founding faculty were influenced by the ideas of the
educational reformer John Dewey,
who would serve as a member of Black Mountain's advisory council, alongside Gropius, Kline, Carl Jung, and Einstein.
Get the corporate
reformers,
who see our children as a business opportunity, out of
educational decision - making and let teachers teach.